Title | 5 Joint and By product costing v1 w5 |
---|---|
Author | Sim L |
Course | Business Valuation & Accounts |
Institution | 香港理工大學 |
Pages | 12 |
File Size | 880.2 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 7 |
Total Views | 156 |
Download 5 Joint and By product costing v1 w5 PDF
AGENDA Basic Terminologies Accounting for Joint Product Costs Accounting for By-Product Costs Sell or Process Further Decision
AF 3112 MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING 2 Joint and By-Product Costing
1
2
Joint Product Processes
BASIC TERMINOLOGIES
A number of products are produced from a single raw material input.
Joint Products
Product 1
Two or more products produced simultaneously by the same process up to a “split-off” point
Split off Point
Single Input
Product 2
The point in the joint production process when joint products become separately identifiable
Separable Costs
Product 3 3
All costs incurred beyond the split-off point that are assignable to each individual products identified at split-off point. 4
Joint Product Processes
BASIC TERMINOLOGIES Main Product
Joint Costs
The higher value product resulted from a joint production process compared with other products.
Intermediate products Oil
Final products Separate Processing
Final Sale
By Product
those also produced from joint product process but with less value
Joint Input
Common Production Process
The distinction between joint and by-products rests solely on the relative importance of their sales value.
Products can change from by-products to joint products when their relative sales values increases, and vive-versa
Separate Processing Costs
Gasoline
Split-Off Point
Separate Processing
Final Sale
Separate Processing Costs
5
6
Joint Costs Allocation Approaches
Examples of Joint & By Products
ALLOCATING JOINT COSTS Market Based
Physical Measure
Sale Value at Split-off Net Realizable Value (NRV) Constant Gross Margin % NRV 7
8
Physical Measure Method Example
Physical Measure Method
Joint Costs
Allocated on the basis of:
Relative weight, volume or other feasible physical measure Joint Input
No relationship with the revenue producing power of the product Applicable when:
240,000 gallons
Oil
Common Production Process
Gasoline
Output product prices are highly volatile Market prices are unavailable for joint products such as on cost-plus contracts
360,000 gallons
Split-Off Point 9
Physical Measure Method Example Joint conversion cost = $225,000 Joint material cost = $275,000
10
Physical Measure Method Example Product
Oil
240,000 gallons Output quantities in gallons Proportionate share:
Common Production Process
Oil
Gasoline
Total
240,000
360,000
600,000
? ? Allocated joint costs: Gasoline
?
360,000 gallons
?
Split-Off Point 11
12
Physical Measure Method Example
Physical Measure Method Example
Product Output quantities in gallons Proportionate share: 240,000 /600,000 360,000 /600,000
Product
Oil
Gasoline
Total
240,000
360,000
600,000
Output quantities in gallons Proportionate share: 240,000 /600,000 360,000 /600,000
40% 60%
Allocated joint costs:
Allocated joint costs: $500,000 x40% $500,000 x60%
? ?
Oil
Gasoline
Total
240,000
360,000
600,000
40% 60% $ 200,000 $ 300,000
$275,000 joint material cost plus $225,000 joint conversion cost 13
14
Sales Value at Split-off Example
Sales Value at Split-off
Joint conversion cost = $225,000
Allocate joint costs based on relative total sales value at split-off point.
Joint material cost = $275,000
Common Production Process
Oil
Sales Value $320,000
Gasoline
Split-Off Point 15
Sales Value $680,000
Sales Value $500,000
Separate Processing Separate Processing Costs $200,000
Separate Processing
Sales Value $1,200,000
Separate Processing Costs $500,000 16
Sales Value at Split-off Example
Sales Value at Split-off Example
Product Oil Sales value at split-off Proportionate share:
Product
Gasoline
Total
Oil
$ 320,000 $ 680,000 $ 1,000,000 ? ?
Allocated joint costs:
Sales value at split-off Proportionate share: $320,000 / $1,000,000 $680,000 / $1,000,000
Gasoline
Total
$ 320,000 $ 680,000 $ 1,000,000 32% 68%
Allocated joint costs: ?
? ?
?
17
Sales Value at Split-off Example
Net Realizable Value (NRV)
Product Oil Sales value at split-off Proportionate share: $320,000 / $1,000,000 $680,000 / $1,000,000 Allocated joint costs: $500,000 x 32% $500,000 x 68%
Gasoline
18
Allocate based on relative NRV
Total
$ 320,000 $ 680,000 $ 1,000,000
NRV = Sales – Separable Costs
32% 68%
Use when the selling price at split for joint products are not available.
$ 160,000 $ 340,000
19
20
Net Realizable Value (NRV) Example Joint conversion cost = $225,000 Joint material cost = $275,000
Net Realizable Value (NRV) Example Product
Sales Value $500,000
Separate Processing
Oil
Separate Processing Costs $200,000
Common Production Process
Oil Sales value Less additional processing costs Estimated NRV at split-off point Proportionate share:
Gasoline
Total
$ 500,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,700,000 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Gasoline
Separate Processing
Sales Value $1,200,000
Separate Processing Costs $500,000
Split-Off Point
Allocated joint costs: ? ?
Assuming both products will be processed further. 21
Net Realizable Value (NRV) Example
22
Net Realizable Value (NRV) Example Product
Product Oil Sales value Less additional processing costs Estimated NRV at split-off point Proportionate share:
Gasoline
Oil
Total
$ 500,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,700,000 200,000 500,000 700,000 $ 300,000 $ 700,000 $ 1,000,000 ? ?
Gasoline
Total
Sales value $ 500,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,700,000 Less additional processing costs 200,000 500,000 700,000 Estimated NRV at split-off point $ 300,000 $ 700,000 $ 1,000,000 Proportionate share: $300,000 /$1,000,000 30% $700,000 /$1,000,000 70% Allocated joint costs:
Allocated joint costs:
?
?
?
?
23
24
Net Realizable Value (NRV) Example
Constant Gross Margin Percentage NRV
Product Oil
Gasoline
Total
Sales value $ 500,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,700,000 Less additional processing costs 200,000 500,000 700,000 Estimated NRV at split-off point $ 300,000 $ 700,000 $ 1,000,000 Proportionate share: $300,000 /$1,000,000 30% $700,000 /$1,000,000 70% Allocated joint costs: $500,000 x30% $500,000 x70%
Allocate joint cost in a way that overall gross margin is identical for individual products. Three steps: Compute overall gross margin for all joint products. Gross Margin (%) x Sales Value for each product Sales Value – Gross Margin = Allocated Cost
A profit allocation method (cross subsidization)
$ 150,000 $ 350,000
25
26
Constant Gross Margin Percentage NRV Example PANEL A
Why Allocate Joint Costs? To get an “A+” in AF3112 ☺ Compute inventory cost and COGS
Product Oil
Gasoline
Total
Sales value $ 320,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,520,000 Less Joint Costs (step 3) ? ? 500,000 Less additional processing costs 500,000 500,000 Gross margin (step 2) ? ? 520,000 Gross margin percentage (step 1) 34.21053 34.21053 34.21053 PANEL B Sales value Less Joint Costs (step 3) a Less additional processing costs
To determine cost reimbursement under contracts
$ 320,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,520,000 $ 210,526 $
289,474 $ 500,000
500,000 500,000
$ 109,474 $ 410,526 $ 520,000 Gross margin (step 2)b Gross margin percentage (step 1) 34.21053 34.21053 34.21053 b
: $109,474=.3421053x $320,000;$410,526=.3421053x1,200,000
a
: $210,526=$320,000-$109,474; $289,474=$1,200,000-$500,000-$410,526
Important for financial accounting purposes, reports to income tax authorities, and internal reporting purposes.
27
It occurs when only a portion of a business’ products or services is sold or delivered to a single customer (i.e. government agency) 28
Choosing Among Joint Cost Allocation Methods
Why Allocate Joint Costs?
Joint costs are truly common costs.
For insurance settlement computation For litigation purposes
Which joint cost allocation method should we use?
Joint cost allocation is important in litigation involving one or more joint products
We get a different result with each method.
For rate regulation
It is impossible to separate the portion of joint costs attributable to one product on a cause and effect basis.
If one or more of the jointly produced products or services are subject to price regulation (nat. gas).
29
30
Choosing Among Joint Cost Allocation Methods
Choice of Allocation Method Conceptually, which allocation method is better?
That makes the choice of methods somewhat arbitrary.
Regardless of the method we choose, we really need to be careful using allocated costs for decision-making purposes.
First choice: Sales at split-off method if there is sufficient information it measures the value of the joint product immediately It doesn’t anticipate subsequent decisions It has meaningful basis it is simple
31
Second choice: NRV method if there is no enough info about individual selling prices at split off point 32
Allocating By-Product Costs Approaches
Accounting for By-Products Joint Costs
ALLOCATING BY-PRODUCT COSTS 1. Sales Method
2. Production Method
Treat NRV of byproducts as Other Revenue
Joint Input
Common Production Process
Major Product
Major Product
Relatively low value or quantity when compared to major products
By-products
Deduct NRV of byproducts from COST of main product
Split-Off Point 33
Accounting for By-Products Joint conversion cost = $50,000
Joint Material cost = $50,000
Common Production Process
Split-Off Point
Accounting for By-Products
Major Product
Sales Value $100,000
Major Product
Sales Value $70,000
By-products
Separate Processing
34
Sales Value $1,500
Separate Processing Costs $400
Major product revenue Other revenue Total revenue Cost of sales: Joint production costs Less by-product NRV Adjusted cost of sales Gross margin
By-Product Accounting Method 2 1 $ 170,000 $ 170,000 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ?
Major product revenue = $100,000 + $70,000 35
36
Accounting for By-Products
Major product revenue Other revenue Total revenue Cost of sales: Joint production costs Less by-product NRV Adjusted cost of sales Gross margin
Accounting for By-Products
By-Product Accounting Method 2 1 $ 170,000 $ 170,000 0 1,100 170,000 171,100 ? ? ? ?
Major product revenue Other revenue Total revenue Cost of sales: Joint production costs Less by-product NRV Adjusted cost of sales Gross margin
? ? ? ?
By-product NRV = $1,500 – $400 = $1,100
By-Product Accounting Method 2 1 $ 170,000 $ 170,000 0 1,100 170,000 171,100 100,000 ? ? ?
100,000 ? ? ?
Joint production costs = $50,000 material + $50,000 conversion 37
Accounting for By-Products
Major product revenue Other revenue Total revenue Cost of sales: Joint production costs Less by-product NRV Adjusted cost of sales Gross margin
By-Products: Some Complications The preceding example assumes the by-product has been sold.
By-Product Accounting Method 2 1 $ 170,000 $ 170,000 0 1,100 170,000 171,100 100,000 1,100 98,900 $ 71,100
38
If the by-product is unsold . . .
100,000 0 100,000 $ 71,100
39
Using method 1, the $1,100 by-product NRV is placed in a by-product inventory account.
Using method 2, the $1,100 by-product NRV is deducted from finished goods inventory or work-in-process inventory if unfinished.
40
Irrelevance of Joint Costs for Decision Making
Irrelevance of Joint Costs for Decision Making
Decision to “sell products at split off or process them further”
Data about Sawmill’s joint products includes:
Sawmill, Inc. cuts logs from which unfinished lumber and wood chips are the joint products.
Sale s va lue a t the split-off point Sale s va lue a fter furthe r proce ssing Allocate d joint product costs Cost of furthe r proce ssing
Unfinished lumber is sold “as is” or processed further into finished lumber. Wood chips can also be sold “as is” for landscaping or processed further into 4 ×× 8 composition boards.
Pe r Log W ood Lum ber Chips $ 140 $ 40 270 50 176 24 50 20
Question: Should Sawmill sell the products at split-off or after further processing? 41
Irrelevance of Joint Costs for Decision Making
Irrelevance of Joint Costs for Decision Making
Should we include the joint cost in this analysis?
Ana lysis of Sell or Proce ss Furthe r
NO. That is a sunk cost to the sell or process further decision.
Decision Criteria for sell or process further decision:
Process further if:
42
Pe r Log W ood Lum ber Chips Sa les va lue a fter furthe r proce ssing $ 270 $ 50 Sa les va lue a t the split-off point 140 40 Incre me nta l re ve nue 130 10 Cost of further proce ssing 50 20 Profit (loss) from furthe r proce ssing $ 80 $ (10)
incremental revenue > incremental processing costs
43
44
Irrelevance of Joint Costs for Decision Making Ana lysis of Sell or Proce ss Furthe r
End of Topic
Pe r Log W ood Lum ber Chips Sa les va lue a fter furthe r proce ssing $ 270 $ 50 Sa les va lue a t the split-off point 140 40 Incre me nta l re ve nue 130 10 Cost of furthe r proce ssing 50 20 Profit (loss) from furthe r proce ssing $ 80 $ (10)
Should we process the lumber further and sell the wood chips “as is?” 45
46...