ASSESSMENT 5 1. DESCRIBE THE SOURCES OF ERROR IN LEVELING DOCX

Title	ASSESSMENT 5 1. DESCRIBE THE SOURCES OF ERROR IN LEVELING
Pages	4
File Size	33.5 KB
File Type	DOCX
Total Downloads	217
Total Views	266

Summary

Description

ASSESSMENT 5 1. DESCRIBE THE SOURCES OF ERROR IN LEVELING Many sources of error exist in levelling and the most commonly met in practice are discussed. Firstly, one of the sources of error is errors in the equipment which is collimation error. This can be a serious source of error in levelling if the sight lengths from one instrument position are not equal, since the collimation error proportional to the difference in sight length. The line of collimation should be parallel to the line of sights. Hence, in all types of levelling, sights should kept equal, particularly back sights and fore sights. Before using any level it is advisable to carry out a two-peg to ensure that the collimation error is as small as possible. Other than that, compensator not working. The function of compensator is to deviate the horizontal ray of light at the optical center of the object lens through the center of the cross hairs. This ensure that line of sight viewed through the telescope is horizontal. If the reading changes to adifferent position each time the footscrew is moved or thr instrument tapped, the compensator is not working properly and the instrument should be returned to the manufacturer for repair. Parallax also one of error in the equipment. Parallax must be eliminated before any readings are taken. Parallax is occur when the image of the distance point or object and focal plane are not fall exactly in the plane of the diaphragm. To eliminate parallax, the eyepiece is first adjusted until the cross hairs appear in sharp focus. Then, defects on the staff which is the incorrect graduation staff cause the zero error. This does not effect height differences if the same staff is used for all the levelling but introduces errors if to staves used for the same series of levels. When using a multisection staff, it is important to unsure that it is properly extended by examining the graduations on either side of each joint. The stability of tripods should alsonbe checked before any fieldwork commences . Secondly, field errors also source of error. The example of field errors is staff not vertical, failure to hold the staff vertical will result in incorrect readings. The staff is held vertical with the aid of a circular bubble. At frequent intervals the circular bubble should checked against plumb line and adjusted if necessary. Another example of field errors is unstable ground. When the instrument is set up on soft ground and bituminous surfaces on hot days, an effect often overlooked is that the tripod lengs may sink into the ground or rise slightly while readings are being taken.This alters the height collimation and therefore advisable to choose firm ground on which to set up the level. After that, handling the instrument and tripod as well as vertical displacement, the HPC may be alteredfor any set-up if the tripod is held or leant against. When levelling, avoid contact with the tripod and only use the level by light contact through the fingertips. Then, instrument not level is also the foeld errors. For automatic levels this source of error is unusual but, for tilting level in which the tilting screw has to be asjusted for each reading, this is common mistake. The best solution is to ensure the main bubble is centralised before and after reading. Thirdly, source of error is the effects of curvature and refraction on levelling. The effect of atmospheric on the line of sight is to bend it towards the Earth's surface causing staff readings to be too low. This is variable effect depending on atmospheric condition but for ordinary work refraction is assumed to have value 1/7 that of curvature bit is of opposite sign. The combined and refraction correction is c + r = 0.0673 D². If longer sight lengths must be used, it is worth remembering that the effects of curvature and refraction will cancel if the sight length are equal. But, curvature and refraction cannot always be ignored when calculating heights using theodolite methods....