Title | Blackburn Summary |
---|---|
Author | Lexi Houk |
Course | ethics and society |
Institution | Radford University |
Pages | 7 |
File Size | 49.2 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 41 |
Total Views | 129 |
Summary of Blackburn- Being Good...
Summary Blackburn, Being Good Introduction - Few people are sensitive to what we might call the moral or ethical environment; the surrounding climate of ideas about how we live. What is acceptable, and when are things are going good. These eventually shape our emotional responses. - Our consciousness of ourselves is largely of even essentially a consciousness of how we stand for other people . - An ethical climate is a different things from a moralistic one. One of the marks of an ethical climate is that we care much about our rights than about our ‘good’. Part One: Seven Threats to Ethics - These threats are ideas that destabilizes us when we think about standards of choice and conduct. 1: The Death of God - For many people ethics is not only tied up with religion, but is completely settled by it. They are given a handbook how to live; to do the will of a Being that is greater than us. - Obedience brings reward, disobedience brings punishment. - The Bible for example, carriers a lot of defend and explanation for embarrassing ethical elements in
it (It is a good thing because the Bible says it, even though it harms other beings). - Gods are not thought of as arbitrary. They have to be regarded as selecting the right things to allow and to forbid. - Plato suggested that religion gives a mythical clothing and mythical authority to humanity’s endless attempt to struggle with death, desire, happiness, good and evil. - Religion is not the foundation of ethics, but it showcases its symbolic expression. - The point is that people behave accordingly to their religious believes and do not develop their own moral values. 2: Relativism - There is no one truth. There are only the different truths or different communities. This is the idea of relativism. - A very attractive side of relativism is its association with toleration of different ways of living. - Many people suppose that if our standards of conduct are ‘just ours’, then that strips them of any real authority. - What is just or right in the eyes of one people may not be so in the eyes of another. - A limitation to relativism suggest that it is necessary for there to be some rule, and hence there is nothing at all to mock about whichever one have hit upon.
- If everybody needs the rule that there should e some rule, that itself represents a universal standard. - Across the whole spectrum of life, it will need some sense of what is expected and what is out of line. For human beings, there is no living without standards of living. However, there is no argument here that the standards have to be fundamentally the same. - There are human rights, which thee practices flout and deny. But the denial of rights is everybody’s concern. - The moral is that once a relativist frame of mind is really in place, nothing – no claims of truth, authority, certainty, or necessity – will be audible except as one more saying like all the others. - It is usually not all certain that the Western values we are upholding are so very alien to others. - Relativism taken to its limit becomes subjectivism: not the view that each culture or society has its own truth, but that each individual has his or her own truth. - Sometimes indeed, ethical conversations need stopping. We are getting nowhere, we agree to differ. This is because of the philosophical view that ethics is somehow ‘ungrounded’. 3: Egoism - We are totally selfish animals. - There are fairly good methods for finding what people actually care about: One is to ask them, and
gauge the sincerity of their response and the plausibility of what they say. The other is to see what they do and try no to do. - All ambition is to due to fear of death: if a man wants statues raised to himself, it is because unconsciously he is afraid of dying. - We can cope with fallibility by shrinking the likelihood of a mistake. We can check on what people say by seeing what they do. - Everyone likes to have the words or ethics on their side. - Perhaps everything comes down to sex, or status, or power, or death. The truth is repressed: it is hidden by false consciousness. - The sociologist Thorstein Veblen posed the theory that people have a need for wasteful display in order to manifest their status. - The Grand Unifying Theory considers that everybody always acts out of their own self-interest. It can be very unclear what this means. People neglect their own interest or sacrifice their own interest of other passions and concerns. 4: Evolutionary Theory - There exists a vague belief that some combination of evolutionary theory, biology and neuroscience will support a Grand Unifying Pessimism. - It is one thing to explain how we come to be as we are. It is a different thing to say that we are
different from what we think we are. - Underneath the mask, we are only concerned to spread genetic material more successfully. - It is sometimes inferred that altruism doesn’t really exist, or that we don’t really care disinterestedly for one another – we only care to maximize our chance of getting a return on our investments of helping behaviour. Most of the times, this is the case. - The first conclusion is to infer that our apparent concerns are not our real concerns, simply from the fact of an evolutionary explanation of them. - The second conclusion is to infer the impossibility that such-and-such a concern should exist, from the fact that we have no evolutionary explanation drift. - It is inferred that the human animal must itself be selfish, since somehow this is the only appropriate psychology for the vehicle in which these little monsters are carried. 5. Determinism and Futility - The idea of determinism is that since it is ‘all in the genes’, the enterprise of ethics becomes hopeless. We cannot kick against nature. - This raises the whole thorny topic of free will. - However, because whatever our genetic make-up programs us to do, it leaves room for what we can call ‘input-responsiveness’. It leaves room for us to vary our behaviour in response to what we
hear or feel or touch or see. - Free will also varies our desires in accordance with what we learn. - Free will also leaves room for us to be influenced by information gathered from others. - Finally, free will leaves room for us to be affected by the attitudes of others. - Many of our beliefs, desires and attitudes show endless plasticity. They vary with our surroundings, including the moral climate in which we find ourselves. 6: Unreasonable Demands - We should not demand too much from ourselves and each other. - Many theories of ethics highlight the impartial and universal nature of the moral point of view. It is a point of view that treats everyone equally: every person has equal rights. - The centre of ethics must be occupied by things we can reasonably demand of each other. - We still have plenty of standards left to uphold. We should still want to respond to the reasonable demand of decency. We should do our best to solve the problems we can solve. - We have some sense that we should keep our own hand clean, however much other will then dirty theirs. 7: False Consciousness - The Grand Unifying Pessimisms tries to discover hidden unconscious motivations, thigs that really move us, leaving ethical concerns exposed as mere whistles on the engine. - A critic might now suggest that ethics as an institution is a system whose real function is other than it seems. - There are indeed institutions, such as the Church or State, that may seek to control our standards, and their nature and function may need to be queried. But that will means at most a different ethic. It does not and cannot introduce the end of ethics.
- Experiments in free living find they face a dilemma. Either, standards are introduced: standards of truth-telling, privacy, space, use of materials, job rotas, and so on, eventually apt to include property rights and rights connected with sexual bondings, or, the commune breaks up. - Gratitude to those who have done us good, sympathy with those in pain or in trouble, and dislike of those who delight in causing pain and trouble, are natural to most of us, and are good things. Almost any ethic will encourage them. - The difference of luck affects how we think of them, how they think of themselves, and even the penalties imposed by society and by the law. ...