Calc3 cheat sheet onesheet PDF

Title Calc3 cheat sheet onesheet
Author Shosh Almazroeui
Course Calculus I
Institution The Petroleum Institute
Pages 1
File Size 153 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 70
Total Views 129

Summary

Download Calc3 cheat sheet onesheet PDF


Description

Derivatives Dx ex = ex Dx sin(x) = cos(x) Dx cos(x) =  sin(x) Dx tan(x) = sec2 (x) Dx cot(x) =  csc2 (x) Dx sec(x) = sec(x) tan(x) Dx csc(x) =  csc(x) cot(x) , x 2 [1, 1] Dx sin1 = p 1

1x 2 1 , x 2 [1, 1] 1x 2 1 ⇡ , ⇡ 2  x  2 1+x 2

Dx cos1 = p 1

Dx tan

=

Dx sec1 =

|x|

p1

x 2 1

, |x| > 1

Dx sinh(x) = cosh(x) Dx cosh(x) =  sinh(x) Dx tanh(x) = sech2 (x) Dx coth(x) = csch2 (x) Dx sech(x) = sech(x) tanh(x) Dx csch(x) = csch(x) coth(x) Dx sinh1 = p 1 Dx cosh1 = Dx tanh1 = Dx sech1 = Dx ln(x) =

x 2 +1 p 1 , x > 1 x 2 1 1 1 This is the approximate change in z The actual change in z is the difference in z values: ∆z = z  z1

f(x, y, z)dv = R a Rs (x) R (x,y) 2 2 2 f(x, y, z)dzdydx a1 1 (x) 1 (x,y) Note: dv can be exchanged for dxdydz in any order, but you must then choose your limits of integra tion a ccording to that order

Maxima and Minima

Jacobian Method RR

Internal Points 1. Take the Partial Derivatives with respect to X and Y (fx and fy ) (C an use gradient) 2. Set derivatives equal to 0 and use to solve system of equations for x and y 3. Plug back into original equation for z. Use Second Derivative Test for whether points are local max, min, or saddle Second Partial Derivative Test 1. Find all (x,y) points such that rf(x, y) = 0~ 2 (x, y) 2. Let D = fxx (x, y)fyy (x, y)  fxy IF (a) D > 0 AND fxx < 0, f(x,y) is local max value (b) D > 0 AND fxx (x, y) > 0 f(x,y) is local min value (c) D < 0, (x,y,f(x,y)) is a saddle point (d) D = 0, test is inconclusive 3. Determine if any boundary point gives min or max. Typically, we have to parametrize boundary and then reduce to a Calc 1 type of min/max problem to solve. The following only apply only if a boundary is given 1. check the corner points 2. Check each line (0  x  5 would give x=0 and x=5 ) On Bounded Equations, this is the global min and max...second derivative test is not needed.

Lagrange Multipliers Given a function f(x,y) with a constraint g(x,y), solve the following system of equations to find the max and min points on the constraint (NOTE: may need to also find internal points.): rf = rg g(x, y) = 0(or kif given)

R RG R

f(g (u, v), h(u, v))|J(u, v)|dudv = f(x, y)dxdy    @x @x  @v  J(u, v) =  @u  @y @u

@y @v

Common Jacobians: Rect. to Cylindrical: r Rect. to Spherical: ⇢2 sin()

Vector Fields let f(x, y, z) be a scalar f ield and ~ F (x, y, z) = M(x, y, z)ˆi + N(x, y, z)jˆ+ P (x, y, z)kˆ be a vector f ield, @f @f Grandient of f = rf =< @f @x , @y , @z > Divergence of F~: @N @P r · F~ = @M @x + @y + @z Curl of F~:  ˆj  ˆi  ˆ k   @ @ ~ =@ r⇥F   @x @y @z M N P

Line Integrals

C given by x = x(t), y = y (t ), t 2 [a, b] R Rb = a f(x(t ), y(t))ds c f(x, y)ds q

dy ) 2 dt 2 where ds = ( dx dt ) + ( dt q 1 + ( dy )2 dx dx q 2 or 1 + ( dx dy ) dy

or

To eva lua te a Line Integra l, · get a paramaterized version of the line (usually in terms of t, though in exclusive terms of x or y is ok) · evaluate for the derivatives needed (usually dy, dx, and/or dt) · plug in to original equation to get in terms of the independant variable · solve integral

Projection of u ~ onto ~ v: ~ ·~ v pr v u=( u v ~~ 2 )~

Surfaces

Cross Product ~ u ⇥~ v Produces a Vector (Geometrically, the cross product is the area of a paralellogram with sides ||~ u || and ||~ v ||) ~ u =< u1 , u2 , u3 > ~ v =< v 1 , v2 , v3 >    ˆ ˆ  ˆj k i ~ u ⇥~ v = u 1 u 2 u 3   v1 v2 v3 

a

||~ v||

Ellipsoid y2 x2 2 + b2 +

z2 c2

Given z=f(x,y), the partial derivative of z with respect to x is: @z = @f(x,y) fx (x, y) = zx = @x @x likewise for partial with respect to y: @f(x,y) fy (x, y) = zy = @z @y = @y Notation For fxyy , work ”inside to outside” fx then fxy , then fxyy 3 fxyy = @ f2 ,

=1

Hyperboloid of One Sheet 2 2 x2 + y  z2 = 1 b2 c a2 (Ma jor Axis: z because it follows - )

@x@ y

3

@ f For @x@ 2 y , work right to left in the denominator

Gradients The Gradient of a function in 2 variables is rf =< fx , f y > The Gradient of a function in 3 variables is rf =< fx , f y , fz >

~ u ⇥~ v =0~ means the vectors are pa ra lell

Lines and Planes Equation of a Plane (x0 , y0 , z0 ) is a point on the plane and < A, B, C > is a normal vector

Hyperboloid of Two Sheets 2

2

2

z  x =1  y c2 b2 a2 (Ma jor Axis: Z because it is the one not subtracted)

A(x  x0 ) + B(y  y0 ) + C(z  z0 ) = 0 < A, B, C > · < xx0 , y y0 , zz0 >= 0 Ax + By + Cz = D where D = Ax0 + By 0 + Cz0 Equation of a line A line requires a Direction Vector ~ u =< u1 , u2 , u3 > and a point (x1 , y1 , z1 ) then, a pa ra meteriza tion of a line could be: x = u 1 t + x1 y = u 2 t + y1 z = u 3 t + z1 Distance from a Point to a Plane The distance from a point (x0 , y0 , z0 ) to a plane Ax+By+Cz=D can be expressed by the formula: 0 +By0 +C z0 D| d = |Axp A2 +B 2 +C 2

Elliptic Paraboloid 2 y2 z = xa2 + 2 b

(Ma jor Axis: z because it is the variable NOT squared)

x 2 +y2 +z2

Spherical to Cylindrical r = ⇢ sin() ✓=✓ z = ⇢ cos() Cylindrical to Spherical p ⇢ = r 2 + z2 ✓=✓ cos() = p z r2 +z2

Work Let F~ = Mˆ i + jˆ + ˆk (force) M = M(x, y, z), N = N(x, y, z), P = P (x, y, z) ˆ (Literally)d~ r = dxiˆ+ dyˆj + dzk R Work w = c ~F · d~ r (Work done by moving a particle over curve C with forceF~)

Independence of Path Fund Thm of Line Integrals C is curve given by ~ r (t), t 2 [a, b]; ~ r 0(t) exists. If f(~ r ) is continuously differentiable on an open set containing R ~  f(~a) r ) · d~ r = f(b) C, then c rf(~ Equivalent Conditions ~ F (~ r ) continuous on open connected set D. Then, (a)F~ = rf for some fn f. (if ~ F is conservative) R r ) · d~ r isindep.of pathinD , (b) cF~(~ R , (c) cF~(~ r ) · d~ r = 0 for all closed paths in D. Conservation Theorem ~ F = Mˆi + Njˆ + Pkˆ continuously differentiable on open, simply connected set D. ~ F conservative , r ⇥F~ = ~0 ~ =~ 0 if f My = Nx ) (in 2D r ⇥ F

Take the Pa rtia l derivative with respect to the first-order variables of the function times the partial (or normal) derivative of the first-order variable to the ultimate variable you are looking for summed with the same process for other first-order variables this makes sense for. Example: let x = x(s,t), y = y(t) and z = z(x,y). z then has f irst pa rtia l derivative: @z @z @x and @y x has the partia l derivatives: @x @x and @t @s and y has the derivative: dy dt

In this case (with z containing x and y as well as x and y both containing s and @z @z @x t), the chain rule for @z @s is @s = @x @s The chain rule for @z is

Hyperbolic Paraboloid (Ma jor Axis: Z axis because it is not squared) z=

y2 b2



@t

@x @z dy = @z @x @t + @y dt Note: the use of ”d” instead of ”@” with the function of only one independent variable @z @t

x2 a2

Coord Sys Conv Cylindrical to Rectangular x = r cos(✓) y = r sin(✓) z=z Rectangular to Cylindrical p r = x2 + y 2 tan(✓) = xy z=z Spherical to Rectangular x = ⇢ sin() cos(✓) y = ⇢ sin() sin(✓) z = ⇢ cos() Rectangular to Spherical p ⇢ = x2 + y 2 + z 2 tan(✓) = xy z cos() = p

Chain Rule(s)

Limits and Continuity Limits in 2 or more variables Limits taken over a vectorized limit just evaluate separately for each component of the limit. Strategies to show limit exists 1. Plug in Numbers, Everything is Fine 2. Algebraic Manipulation -factoring/dividing out -use trig identites 3. Change to polar coords if(x, y) ! (0, 0) , r ! 0 Strategies to show limit DNE 1. Show limit is different if approached from different paths (x=y, x = y 2 , etc.) 2. Switch to Polar coords and show the limit DNE. Continunity A fn, z = f(x, y), is continuous at (a,b) if a ll f(a, b) = lim(x,y)!(a,b) f(x, y) Which means: 1. The limit exists 2. The fn value is defined 3. They are the same value

Elliptic Cone (Ma jor Axis: Z axis because it’s the only one being subtracted) 2 x2 + y z2 = 0 2 2  c2 a

b

Cylinder 1 of the va riables is missing OR (x  a)2 + (y  b2 ) = c (Ma jor Axis is missing variable)

Partial Derivatives Partia l Derivatives are simply holding other variables constant (and act like constants for the derivative) and only taking the derivative with respect to a given variable.

Surface Integrals Let ·R be closed, bounded region in xy-plane ·f be a fn with f irst order partial derivatives on R ·G be a surface over R given by z = f(x, y) ·g (x, y, z) = g (x, y, f (x, y)) is cont. on R Then, RR R R G g(x, y, z)dS = f (x, y))dS R g(x, y, q where dS = f 2x + fy2 + 1dydx ~ across G Flux of F R R F~ · ndS = R RG R [Mfx  Nfy + P ]dxdy where: ~ (x, y, z) = ·F M(x, y, z)ˆi + N(x, y, z)jˆ+ P (x, y, z)kˆ ·G is surface f(x,y)=z ·~ n is upward unit normal on G. ·f(x,y) has continuous 1st order partial derivatives

Unit Circle (cos, sin)

Other Information p a p b

pa = b Where p a Cone is defined as z = a(x2 + y 2 ), In SphericalqCoordinates, a )  = cos1 ( 1+a Right Circular Cylinder: V = ⇡r 2 h, SA = ⇡r 2 + 2⇡rh pn = emp limn!inf (1 + m n) Law of Cosines: a2 = b2 + c2  2bc(cos(✓))

Stokes Theorem Let: ·S be a 3D surface ·F~(x, y, z) = M(x, y, z)iˆ+ N(x, y, z)jˆ + P (x, y, z)lˆ ·M,N,P have continuous 1st order partial derivatives ·C is piece-wise smooth, simple, closed, curve, positively oriented ·Tˆ is unit tangent vector to C. Then, RR H ˆ dS = ~) · n ~c · T F ˆ dS = F s (r ⇥ RR F~) · ~ ndxdy R (r ⇥ Remember: H R ~ ~ F · T ds = c(Mdx + Ndy + P dz)

Green’s Theorem (method of changing line integral for double integral - Use for Flux and Circulation across 2D curve and line integrals over a closed boundary) H RR (Mx + Ny )dxdy H Mdy  Ndx = R RR Mdx + Ndy = R (Nx  My )dxdy Let: ·R be a region in xy-plane ·C is simple, closed curve enclosing R (w/ paramerization ~ r (t)) ~ (x, y) = M(x, y) ·F iˆ + N(x, y)ˆj be continuously differentiable over R[C. Form 1: Flux Across Boundary ~ n = unit normal vector to C RR H ~dA ~ F ·~ n= R r ·FR c H R , Mdy  Ndx = R (Mx + Ny )dxdy Form 2: Circulation Along Boundary H RR ~ ~ r ⇥ F · d~ r = F ·u ˆ dA R c H RR , Mdx + Ndy = R (Nx  My )dxdy AreaH of R 1 A = ( 1 2 ydx + 2 xdy)

Gauss’ Divergence Thm (3D Analog of Green’s Theorem - Use for Flux over a 3D surface) Let: ~ (x, y, z) be vector f ield continuously ·F differentiable in solid S ·S is a 3D solid ·@S boundary of S (A Surface) ·ˆ nunit outer normal to @S Then, RR RRR ~ ~ ˆ dS = S r · F dV @S F (x, y, z) · n (dV = dxdydz)

Originally Written By Daniel Kenner for MATH 2210 at the Univers ity of Utah. Source code available at https ://github.com/keytotime/Calc3 CheatSheet Thanks to Kelly Macarthur for Teaching and Providing Notes ....


Similar Free PDFs