CASE DIGESTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II DUE PROCESS DOCX

Title	CASE DIGESTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II DUE PROCESS
Author	Glamorosa Olshoppe
Pages	37
File Size	92.9 KB
File Type	DOCX
Total Downloads	226
Total Views	705

Summary

CASE DIGESTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II (4)Deportation Proceedings, (5)Fixing Rates and DUE PROCESS: Regulation of Profession, (6)Closure Proceedings, (1) Judicial Proceedings, (2) Administrative and Quasi- (7) Termination Proceedings Judicial Proceedings, (3)Academic Discipline, BANCO ESPANOL VS PALA...

Description

CASE DIGESTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW II DUE PROCESS: (1) Judicial Proceedings, (2) Administrative and Quasi- Judicial Proceedings, (3)Academic Discipline, (4)Deportation Proceedings, (5)Fixing Rates and Regulation of Profession, (6)Closure Proceedings, (7) Termination Proceedings BANCO ESPANOL VS PALANCA........................................................................................................................................1 JUAN CARVAJAL vs. CA, et al...........................................................................................................................................3 State Prosecutors v Muros..............................................................................................................................................4 WEBB V DE LEON.............................................................................................................................................................5 247 SCRA 652...........................................................................................................................................................5 People vs. Claudio Teehankee, Jr....................................................................................................................................6 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintifappellee, vs. MAYOR ANTONIO L. SANCHEZ, GEORGE MEDIALDEA, ZIOLO AMA, BALDWIN BRION, LUIS CORCOLON, ROGELIO CORCOLON, and PEPITO KAWIT, accusedfappellants....................8 Perez v. Estrada...............................................................................................................................................................9 AM No. 01f4f03fSC June 29, 2001...............................................................................................................................9 Perez v. Estrada.............................................................................................................................................................10 ANG TIBAY, represented by TORIBIO TEODORO, manager and propietor, and NATIONAL WORKERS BROTHERHOOD vs. THE COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS and NATIONAL LABOR UNION, INC...........................................................11 Office of the Court Administrator v. Pascual.................................................................................................................12 Atty. Napoleon S. Valenzuela v. Judge Reynaldo Bellosillo ...........................................................................................14 Lumiqued vs. Exevea.....................................................................................................................................................15 Fabella v. Court of Appeals............................................................................................................................................16 Summary Dismissal Board v. Torcita..............................................................................................................................17 Office of the Ombudsman v Coronel.............................................................................................................................18 Justce Secretary v. Lanton...........................................................................................................................................19 180 SCRA 756.........................................................................................................................................................29 Philcomsat vs Alcuaz......................................................................................................................................................29 Radio Communicatons v NTC........................................................................................................................................31 G.R. No. Lf68729 May 29, 1987.............................................................................................................................31 Globe Telecom vs NTC...................................................................................................................................................33 CORONA VS. UHPAP......................................................................................................................................................34 CENTRAL BANK VS. CA...................................................................................................................................................35 RURAL BANK VS. CA.......................................................................................................................................................36 PHILIPPINE MERCHANT VS. CA......................................................................................................................................37 AGABON vs. NLRC..........................................................................................................................................................38 BANCO ESPANOL VS PALANCA 37 Phil. 921 FACTS: Engracio Palanca was indebted to El Banco and he had his parcel of land as security to his debt. His debt amounted to P218,294.10. His property is worth 75k more than what he owe. Due to the failure of Engracio to make his payments, El Banco executed an instrument to mortgage Engracio's property. Engracio however left for China and he never returned til he died. Since Page 1 of 39 Consttutonal Law II Cases Due Process...