Title | Chapter 12... ready - Judgement at an early stage. |
---|---|
Author | Kateka Marivate |
Course | Civil Procedure |
Institution | University of the Free State |
Pages | 13 |
File Size | 196.8 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 79 |
Total Views | 151 |
Judgement at an early stage. ...
CHAPTER 12 – JUDGMENT AT AN EARLY STAGE AND STAY OF PROCEEDINGS Summary BASIC STEPS TO ACTION PROCEDURE: Plaintiff issues SUMMONS Defendant delivers a NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DEFEND and EXTRA STEPS Defendant delivers PLEA Plaintiff delivers a REPLICATION Litis contestatio
Intention to Defend OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO DEFENDANT AFTER RECIEVING SERVICE OF SUMMONS:
A main options available: Defendant can refrain from defending action (plaintiff can apply for default judgment) Defendant may defend actions (plaintiff may apply for summary judgment if defendant has no bona fide defence) Defendant can comply with plaibtiff’s claim Defendant may consent to judgment (MC) or confess to judgment (HC)
DEFENDANT DEFENDS THE ACTION:
Defendant issues a notice of intention to defend Ie: he files a notice with the registrar/ clerk of the court and delivers a copy of the notice on the plaintiff Deliver the notice NOT issue It is not a pleading
Legal effect of notice: Places the defendant’s attorney as the attorney on record Implication = attorney will have to formally withdraw as attorney of record by issuing a notice of intention to withdraw INTENTION TO DEFEND IN HC:
Dies induciae: HCR 19: Must be delivered within 10 court days after receiving the service of summons If state = 20 court days Does not include court recess/ weekends/ public holidays (= dies non) FOLI principle S27 SC Act provides for a situation where summons is served outside the court’s jurisdiction – time limits are 14 calendar days (place is within 100miles/160km of court) 21 calendar says (place is further than 100miles/160km away from court)
Content of notice: Must inform the plaintiff that the defendant will contest the matters Must appoint and address for the acceptance of all service of processes (8km rule) Defendants residential or business address
Effect of Notice: Mere fact defendant enters into a notice of intention to defend does not mean that he waives any of his rights to raise an irregularity in proceedings / object to court’s jurisdiction etc Can still issue a notice of intention to defend after expiry of dies as long default judgment has not been granted If plaintiff already applied for a default judgment and defendant delivers notice after prescribed period – plaintiff will not be allowed to proceed with default judgment but will be entitled to the costs of an unsuccessful default judgment application
INTENTION TO DEFEND IN MC:
Dies induciae: Same as HC: Must be delivered within 10 court days after receiving the service of summons If state = 20 court days Does not include court recess/ weekends/ public holidays (= dies non) FOLI principle Does not distinguish between inside/outside courts area of jurisdiction
Content of notice: Must inform the plaintiff that the defendant will contest the matters Must appoint and address for the acceptance of all service of processes (15km rule) Defendants residential or business address PLUS additional info (vs HC) Appoint a postal address Plus parties may agree to appoint an electronic address for the service of processes
Electronic addresses Defendant can ask plaintiff whether he will accept service of processes by electronic mail State his preferred method of service Plaintiff may consent to the electronic service in writing If plaintiff refuses – defendant can apply for consent from the court Defendant must still appoint the 15km address
Judgment at Early Stage GENERAL:
Normally judgment is granted at the end of the trial procedure
However, there are certain exceptions where judgments are granted at an earlier stage: Default judgment
Summary judgment Consent / confession to judgment
Default Judgment WHAT IS A DEFAULT JUDGMENT:
= A short cut judgment
2 forms of default judgments based on: Defaults on appearance Default on pleadings Default: Is when a party fails to deliver and file a document/ pleading within the prescribed time limits OR when a party fails to appear in court Remedy to opposing party = may follow certain steps and request a default judgment be granted
Default judgment: Is a judgment taken against a party who is in default Without hearing the version of such a party
Result of a default judgment: = The speedy conclusion of a matter Pleadings phase is cut short No preparation for trial or trial stage takes place
DIFFERENT GROUNDS/ TYPES OF DEFAULTS:
In the HC, default judgment may be taken on the following grounds: Failure of defendant to deliver a notice of intention to defend Failure of defendant to deliver a plea within prescribed time limits Failure of plaintiff to deliver declaration Failure of the plaintiff to plea against defendant’s counterclaim Failure of a party to appear at trial
In the MC, default judgment may be taken on the following grounds:
Failure of the defendant to deliver a notice of intention to defend Defendant’s defective appearance to defend Failure of defendant to deliver a plea within prescribed time limits Failure of the plaintiff to plea against defendant’s counterclaim Failure of a party to appear at trial FAILURE TO DELIVER A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DEFEND:
= Most common situation
Content of the application for default judgment: Request is accompanied by the original summons and return of service Request must allege that the defendant did not deliver a notice of intention to defend within prescribed limits Procedure to apply for a default judgment, in both the HC and MC, due to failure to deliver the notice of intention to defend = depends on the NATURE of the claim Ie: debt/ liquidated amount VS unliquidated amount
What is a debt/ liquidated amount: = a claim for a fixed/ certain/ ascertained amount or thing Note – may granted by the registrar/ clerk of the court
What is an unliquidated amount: = a claim for damages Note – cannot be granted by registrar/ clerk of court – must be granted by a judge in the HC
Procedure for a debt / liquidated amount in HC: Regulated by HCR 31 (5)(a) Plaintiff may lodge a written request for default judgment to the registrar of the court no notice needs to be given to defendant Thus, it takes place administratively in the chambers of the registrar Purpose/ reason for this rule = to relieve the workload/ burden of judges and to allow the
registrar to assume the burden of deciding uncomplicated default requests Registrar must place any judgment/ direction decided upon on record Party not satisfied by the judgment/ direction can apply to the court within 20days after receiving notice of such judgment/ direction, to have it set aside based on good cause shown Options for a Registrar when dealing with a request for default judgment – ie: he/ she may: Grant the judgment as requested Grant judgment for only part of the claim or on amended terms Refuse judgment completely or partially Postpone judgment on reasonable terms Request or receive oral or written submissions Requires that the matter be set down for hearing in an open court Grant judgment for costs
Procedure for an unliquidated amount in the HC: Regulated by HCR 31(2)(a) Matters must be set down for hearing before an open court The matter is argued formally by council No notice needs to be given to defendant Evidence must be led to prove the plaintiff/s cause of action or the quantum of damages
Procedure for a debt / liquidated amount in MC: Plaintiff may lodge a written request for default judgment with the clerk of the court Ie: default judgments are dealt with by judgment clerks and not heard before the court The request is discussed in chambers No notice needs to be given to defendant No evidence needs to be led
Procedure for an unliquidated amount in the MC: Matters must be set down for hearing before court Cannot be granted by the clerk NOT granted in an open court – it is done by the magistrate in his chambers Party must adduce evidence regarding quantum of damages Evidence must either be oral or by way of affidavit
Affidavit – normally attached to request and deponent must be an actual expert – ie: a person who is qualified to testify to the actual nature and extent of damage DEFENDANT’S FAILURE TO FILE A PLEA:
Procedure = similar to procedure for application for default judgment with regards to failing to enter into an appearance to defend EXCEPTION – only difference = that default judgment for failure to deliver a plea within prescribed dies CANNOT be applied for immediately First have to deliver a NOTICE OF BAR
What is a Notice of Bar: = A notice calling on the defendant to enter into a plea within 5 court days Failing which he will be ipso facto barred from delivering the plea
Content of the application for default judgment: Request is accompanied by the original summons and return of service As well as with the notice of bar and acknowledgment of receipt/ proof of dispatch Request must allege that although the defendant delivered a notice of intention to defend – he failed to enter into a plea timeously despite having been served with a notice of bar
Procedure in HC: Defendant fails to deliver plea within prescribed dies First – plaintiff must deliver a Notice of Bar in terms of HCR 26, after 20 days after notice of intention to defend was delivered, giving defendant 5 court days to file his plea Defendant still fails to deliver plea = ipso facto barred from pleading Plaintiff can then apply for default judgment (notice of application MUST be given to defendant) Application for default judgment = same as application when failing to deliver a notice of intention to defend (see above)
Procedure in MC: Defendant fails to deliver plea within prescribed dies First – plaintiff must deliver a Notice of Bar in terms of MCR 12(1), after 20 days after notice of intention to defend was delivered, giving defendant 5 court days to file his plea Defendant still fails to deliver plea = ipso facto barred from pleading Plaintiff can then apply for default judgment (NO notice needs to be given to defendant) Application for default judgment = same as application when failing to deliver a notice of intention to defend (see above)
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO FILE A DECLARATION:
Occurs both in the HC and in the MC HCR 31 and MCR 15
Failure of plaintiff to file the declaration to the simple summons – defendant must deliver a Notice of Bar calling on plaintiff to deliver declaration within 5 court days
Failure = ipso facto barred from filing declaration
The defendant may then apply for either: Absolution from the instance (because plaintiff has not proved claim in simple summons) OR Judgment calling for the claim to be dismissed
DEFENDANT’S DEFECTIVE APPEARANCE TO DEFEND:
Only occurs in the MC – the defendant’s appearance to defend must be defective
Dealt with in new MCR 12(2) which stipulates that: Clerk will not grant a default judgment immediately when the plaintiff applies for it
Plaintiff must first give the defendant written notice of the defect and afford him 5 days to correct such defect Only if defendant fails to correct defect after 5 days then default judgment will be granted
Examples of defects: It is not properly delivered It is not properly signed It does not set out the postal address or person signing it or address for service Has to or more defects relating to form
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO FILE A PLEA AGAINST THE DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIM:
Regulated by HCR 24 and MCR 20
Plaintiff must deliver a plea to defendant’s counterclaim within prescribed dies If not – defendant must deliver a Notice of Bar calling on plaintiff to deliver plea within 5 court days of receipt of counterclaim Failing which = plaintiff is ipso facto barred from filing plea Defendant may then apply for a default judgment on the counterclaim
FAILURE OF A PARTY TO APPEAR AT TRIAL:
Applies to both application and action procedure
Regulated by HCR 39(3) and MCR 32(1)
Procedure in HC: If plaintiff fails to appear in court – P.O may grant: Absolution from the instance A final judgment in favour of defendant (thus no similar proceedings can be instituted by plaintiff against defendant)
If defendant fails to appear in court – P.O may: Allow plaintiff to prove claim Grant a default judgment
Procedure in MC: If plaintiff fails to appear in court – P.O may dismiss application with costs (ie: absolution from the instance) If defendant fails to appear in court – P.O may grant a default judgment without costs May = Discretion of the P.O
Non-Compliance with and Deviation from the Rules GENERAL:
Purpose of rules of court = to ensure: The orderly course of litigation proceedings And that all procedural steps comply with the requirements of form and the prescribed time limits The convenience of courts and the proper administration of justice
However, this does not mean that such rules must be applied inflexibly: In exceptional circumstances parties can deviate from the prescribed rules and it would be unfair to hold them in rigid compliance Thus, provision is made for the non-compliance with the rules and condonation by the court in certain circumstances based on good cause shown Also, parties themselves can agree to extensions of time, or the removal of a sanction of non-compliance etc...
High Court
GENERAL:
Different situations of non-compliance can be distinguished: Notice of Bar Discharge of Bar or extension by agreement Discharge of bar, extension of time and condonation Application to compel
NOTICE OF BAR:
HCR 26: If any party fails to file ‘any pleading’ within the prescribed dies Opposing party must serve a notice of bar on the defaulting party Calling on them to deliver the pleading within 5 days of receipt of such notice Failing which, defaulting party will be ipso facto barred from delivering such a pleading thereafter
Exception: When defaulting party has failed to deliver a replication or subsequent pleading within the prescribed dies The party is then under bar ipso facto No notice of bar is required
Effect of the notice of bar: If defendant is barred from filing a notice of intention to defend or plea = disbarred from placing any defence to the merits before the court If plaintiff is barred from filing a declaration = prevented from presenting its case before the court Any defendant/ plaintiff that is barred may not file any pleading – and registrar may not accept any pleading without a court order If party is barred from delivering a replication or subsequent pleading – only barred from such and cannot be prevented from appearing in trial
DISCHARGE OF BAR OR EXTENSION BY AGREEMENT:
HCR 17(1): Litigating parties may always consensually agree on the removal or discharge of bar OR The extension or abridgment of a time period to take an essential procedural step
Forms part of ‘party control’ which regulates the SA civil litigation process
Refusal to agree to removal of bar will NOT necessarily lead to an award of costs against that party – unless refusal was unreasonable
DISCHARGE OF BAR, EXTENSION OF TIME AND CONDONATION:
HCR 27(1) and (2): If non-defaulting party refuses to consent to removal of bar or extension of a prescribed time period Defaulting party may apply to the court requesting an order of discharge of the bar or extension of the time periods
HCR 27(3): Court is authorised to condone no-compliance with the rules ONLY if it would not result in flagrant breach of the rules or defeat the object of the rules
In order to succeed – Applicant must show good cause and that the application is bona fide and not frivolous It = an application Notice of motion + founding affidavit 4 requirements must be complied with (Smith v Brummer): Must contain a reasonable explanation for the Applicant’s default That the application is bona fide and is not made with the intention to delay the opposing party’s claim That there has been no reckless disregard for the rules
Opposing party will not be prejudiced by the granting of the application APPLICATION TO COMPEL:
Certain rules allow a party to approach the court, in order to compel a party to take a certain procedural step, eg: Compel further particulars – HCR 21(4) Compel discovery of documents – HCR 35
Magistrate’s Courts GENERAL:
Main rule = MCR 60 Read together with certain specific rules
MCR 60: Non-compliance with rules of MC Time limits and errors Interlocutory applications: MCR 60(2) = application to compel compliance MCR 60(3) = application for judgment
MCR 60(5): Time periods can be extended by written consent of parties (except appeals in terms of MCR 51) No consent between parties – same as HC above...