Chapter 25 Outline - Summary Campbell Biology PDF

Title Chapter 25 Outline - Summary Campbell Biology
Course Introduction to Biology A
Institution University of Pennsylvania
Pages 9
File Size 89 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 57
Total Views 144

Summary

Ch 25 summary...


Description

Chapter 25: Phylogeny and Systematics Overview “Investigating the Tree of Life” 

Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of a species or a group of species



They use systematics, an analytical approach to understanding the diversity and relationships of organisms, both present-day and extinct



Systematists have traditionally studied morphologically and biochemical resemblances among organism as a basis for inferring evolutionary relationships



Systematists have gained a powerful new tool, molecular systematics, which uses comparisons of DNA, RNA, and other molecules to infer evolutionary relationships between individual genes and even between entire genomes



This information allows evolutionary biologists to construct a universal tree of all life 25.1 “Phylogenies are based on common ancestries inferred from fossil, morphological, and molecular evidence”



Fossils can establish relationships between living organisms because they reveal ancestral characteristics that may have been lost over time in certain lineages The Fossil Record



Sedimentary rocks are the richest source of fossils



Deposits pile up and compress the older sediments into layers called strata



The fossil record is based on the sequence in which fossils have accumulated in such strata



Fossils only inform phylogeny only if we can determine their ages, clarifying the order in which various characteristics appeared and disappeared Morphological and Molecular Homologies



Certain morphological and molecular similarities among living organisms can indicate phylogenetic history Sorting Homology from Analogy



A potential red herring in constructing a phylogeny is similarity due to convergent evolution—called analogy—rather than to shared ancestry (homology)



Another clue to distinguishing between homology and analogy is to consider the complexity of the characters being compared



If genes in two organisms share many portions of their nucleotide sequences, it is highly likely that the genes are homologous Evaluating Molecular Homologies



Molecular comparisons of nucleic acid often pose technical challenges



The first step is to align comparable nucleic acid sequences from the two species being studied. If the species are very closely related, the sequences likely differ at only one or a few sites



Nucleic acid sequences in distantly related species usually have different bases at many sites and may even have different lengths



Over longer periods of time, insertions and deletions accumulated, altering the lengths of the gene sequences



Systematists use computer programs to analyze comparable DNA segments of differing lengths and realign them properly



Scientists have developed mathematical tools that can distinguish “distant” homologies from such coincidental matches in extremely divergent sequences 25.2 “Phylogenetic systematics connects classification with evolutionary history”



Taxonomy is an ordered division of organisms into categories based on a set of characteristics used to assess similarities and differences Binomial Nomenclature



To avoid ambiguity when communicating about organisms, biologists refer to each species by a specific name, called a binomial



The first part of the species’ name is the genus to which the species belongs



The second part is the specific epithet, which is unique for each species within the genus Hierarchical Classification



Beyond genera, systematists employ progressively more comprehensive categories of classification



They place related genera in the same family, families => orders, orders => classes, classes => phylum, phylum => kingdoms, and kingdoms => domains

Linking Classification and Phylogeny



Systematists use branching diagrams called phylogenetic trees to depict their hypotheses about evolutionary relationships



The branching of such trees reflects the hierarchical classification of groups nested within more inclusive groups



A phylogenetic tree is often constructed from a series of dichotomies, or twoway branching points; each branch point represents the divergence of two species from a common ancestor



Each of the “deeper” branch points represents progressively greater amounts of divergence



The sequences of branching in a tree does not indicate the actual age of the particular species 25.3 “Phylogenetic systematics informs the construction of phylogenetic trees based on shared characters”



Patterns of shared characteristics can be depicted in a diagram called a cladogram



A cladogram by itself does not imply evolutionary history, but if the shared characteristics are due to common ancestry, then the cladogram forms the basis of a phylogenetic tree



A clade is defined as a group of species that includes an ancestral species and all its descendants. The analysis of how species may be grouped into clades is called cladistics

Cladistics



A valid clade is monophyletic, signifying that it consists of the ancestral species and all its descendants



A paraphyletic grouping consists of an ancestral species and some, but not all, of the descendants



A polyphyletic grouping consists of several species that lack a common ancestor Shared Primitive and Shared Derived Characters



After systematists have separated homologous and analogous similarities, they must sort through the homologies to distinguish shared primitive and shared derived characters. Characters here refers to any feature that a particular taxon possesses



A shared primitive character is shared beyond the taxon we are trying to define



A shared derived character is an evolutionary novelty unique to a particular clade Outgroups



Systematists use outgroup comparison to differentiate between shared derived characters and shared primitive characters



An outgroup is a species or a group of species that is closely related to the ingroup, the various species we are studying

Phylogenetic Trees and Timing Phylograms



In a phylogram, the length of a branch reflects the number of changes that taken have place in a particular DNA sequences in that lineage Ultrametric Trees



Even though the branches in a phylogram may have different lengths, all the different lineages that descend from a common ancestor have survived for the same number of years



The equal amounts of chronological time can be represented in an ultrametric tree



The branching pattern is the same as in a phylogram, but all of the branches that can be traced from the common ancestor to the present are of equal length



They can draw on data from the fossil record to place certain branch points in the context of geologic time Maximum Parsimony and Maximum Likelihood



According to the principle of maximum parsimony, we should first investigate the simplest explanation that is consistent with the facts



The principle of maximum likelihood states that, given certain rules about how DNA changes over time, a tree can be found that reflects the most likely sequences of evolutionary events

Phylogenetic Trees as Hypotheses



Any phylogenetic tree represents a hypothesis about how the various organisms in the tree are related to one another. The best hypothesis is the one that fits all the available data



Applying parsimony in molecular systematics is more reliable for a data set of many long DNA sequences than for a smaller data set



The strongest phylogenetic hypotheses are those supported by multiple lines of molecular and morphological evidence as well as by fossil evidence 25.4 “Much of an organism’s evolutionary history is documented in its genome”



The ability of molecular trees to encompass both short and long periods of time is based on the fact that different genes evolve at different rates, even in the same evolutionary lineage Gene Duplications and Gene Families



Gene duplication increases the number of genes in the genome, providing opportunities for further evolutionary changes



Orthologous genes refer to the homologous genes that are passed in a straight line from one generation to the next but have ended up in different gene pools because of speciation



Paralogous genes result from gene duplication, so they are found in more than one copy in the same genome



Orthologous genes can only diverge after speciation has taken place, with the result that the genes are found in separate gene pools



Paralogous genes can diverge even while they are in the same gene pool, because they are present in more than one copy in the genome Genome Evolution



Orthologous genes are widespread and can extend over huge evolutionary distances



The number of genes seems not to have increased through duplication at the same rate of phenotypic complexity 25.5 “Molecular clocks can help track evolutionary time” Molecular Clocks



The concept of a molecular clock is a yardstick for measuring the absolute time of evolutionary change based on the observation that some genes and other regions of genomes appear to evolve at constant rates



The assumption underlying the molecular clock is that the number of nucleotide substitutions in orthologous genes is proportional to the time that has elapsed since the species branched from their common ancestor



You can calibrate the molecular clock of a gene that has a reliable average rate of evolution by graphing the number of nucleotide differences against the times of a series of evolutionary branch points that are known from the fossil record Neutral Theory



Neutral theory is that much evolutionary change in genes and proteins has no effect on fitness and therefore is not influenced by Darwinian selection

Difficulties with Molecular Clocks



Molecular clocks does not run as smoothly as neutral theory predicts



Many irregularities are likely to be the result of natural selection in which DNA changes are favored over others The Universal Tree of Life



Investigators use two criteria to identify regions of DNA molecules that can demonstrate the branching pattern of this tree



The regions must be able to be sequenced, and they must have evolved so slowly that homologies between even distantly related organisms can still be detected



The tree of life consists of three great domains: Bacteria, Archaea, Eukarya



Domain bacteria includes most of the currently known prokaryotes



Archaea consists of a diverse group of prokaryotic organisms that inhabit a wide variety of environments



Eukarya consists all of the organisms that have cells containing true nuclei



The early history of these domains is not clear



Horizontal gene transfer is when genes are transferred from one genome to another through mechanisms such as transposable elements, and perhaps through fusions of different organisms



Because phylogenetic trees are based on the assumption that genes are passed vertically from one generation to the next, the occurrence of such horizontal events means that the universal trees built from different genes often give inconsistent results, particularly near the root of that tree...


Similar Free PDFs