Title | Chapter 7 Parties to Crime and Vicarious Liability |
---|---|
Author | Luisa De Luca |
Course | Criminal Law |
Institution | Fairleigh Dickinson University |
Pages | 3 |
File Size | 51.1 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 57 |
Total Views | 158 |
Chapter 7 notes from the course Criminal Law. ...
●
●
Parties to Crime ○ When, under extraordinary circumstances, teamwork turns malicious, then benign “teamwork” can become “complicity” in criminal law. ○ Complicity e stablishes when you can be criminally liable for someone else’s conduct. ○ It applies criminal liability to accomplices and accessories because they participate in crimes. ○ Vicarious liability e stablishes when a party can be criminally liable because of a relationship. ○ Vicarious liability transfers the criminal conduct of one party to another because of their relationship. ○ By far the most common relationships are business relationships, such as employer-employee, corporation-manager, buyer-seller, producer-consumer, and service provider-recipient. ○ First, the agency theory of accomplice liability assumes that we’re autonomous agents with the freedom to choose our actions. ○ We become accountable for someone else’s actions when we voluntarily “join and identify with those actions.” ○ Underlying the second theory, forfeited personal identity theory, is the idea that when you choose to participate in crime, you forfeit your right to be treated as an individual. ○ The criminal law in focus box defines the four common law parties to crime. ○ These four distinct categories used to be important because of the common law rule that the government couldn’t try accomplices until principals in the first degree were convicted. ○ Today, there are two parties to criminal complicity: ■ Accomplices, p articipants before and during the commission of crimes. ■ Accessories, p articipants after crimes are committed. Participation Before and During the Commission of a Crime ○ All participants before and during the commission of a crime are prosecuted for the crime itself. ○ So participation before and during a crime is a very serious business, because the punishment for being an accomplice is the same as for the person who actually committed the crime. ○ Participation after crimes are committed are prosecuted as a separate, minor offense. ○ Accessories are punished for misdemeanors, a much less serious offense, because accessories are considered obstructers of justice, not felons. ○ Conspiracy i s an agreement to commit some other crime. ○ A conspiracy to commit murder is not murder; its the lesser offense of agreeing to commit murder.
Participating in a murder is the crime of murder itself. The rule that the crime of conspiracy and the crime the conspirators agree to commit are separate offenses is called the p inkerton rule. ○ The name comes from a leading spired to evade taxes. Accomplice Actus Reus ○ The words “aid,” “abet,” “assist,” “counsel,” “procure,” “hire,” or “induce” are widespread. ○ The meaning of these words boils down to one core idea: the actor took “some positive act in aid of the commission of the offense.” ○ Here are a few acts that definitely qualify: ■ Providing guns, supplies, or other instruments of crime. ■ Serving as a lookout. ■ Driving a getaway car. ■ Sending the victim to the principal. ■ Preventing warnings from getting to the victim. ○ Mere presence at the scene of a crime is not enough to qualify as accomplice actus reus. ○ According the the mere presence rule, even the presence at the scene of a crime followed by flight isn’t enough action. ○ One final point about accomplice actus reus: actions taken after crimes are committed aren’t themselves accomplice actus reus, but juries can use participation after the crime to prove defendants participated before or during the commission of the crime. Participation After the Commission of a Crime ○ In common law, accessories after the fact were punished like accomplices: they were treated as if they’d committed the crime itself. ○ Modern statutes have reduced the punishment to fit this less serious offense. ○ Accessory after the fact is a separate offense, usually a misdemeanor. ○ Sometimes it even has a different name such as, “obstructing justice,” “interfering with prosecution,” and “aiding in escape.” ○ Most accessory-after the fact statutes gave four elements, which includes one actus reus, two mens rea, and one circumstance element: ■ The accessory personally aided the person who committed the crime. ■ The accessory knew the felony was committed. ■ The accessory aided the person who committed the crime for the purpose of hindering the prosecution of that person. ■ Someone besides the accessory actually committed a felony. Vicarious Liability ○ Most vicarious liability involves business relationships, such as employer-employee, manager-corporation, buyer-seller, producer-consumer, and service provider-recipient. ○ ○
●
●
●
●
Individual Vicarious Liability ○ Individuals are vicariously liable for their agents’ actions in state cases; most don’t attract our attention. ○ Most common are cases of employees’ crimes, committed within the scope of their employment but without the approval or knowledge of their employers. ○ Because state individual vicarious liability, like federal corporate vicarious criminal liability, depends on statutes, the issue in most vicarious liability cases is interpreting whether the statute actually imposes vicarious liability....