Title | Constitutional Law Revision Notes |
---|---|
Course | Constitutional Law |
Institution | Canterbury Christ Church University |
Pages | 4 |
File Size | 86.9 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 21 |
Total Views | 161 |
Notes taken from revision classes ahead of the exam...
Constitutional Law Revision Sources of the Constitution Key Dates: 1189 – Start of common law in England 1215 – Magna Carta 1200’s – Wages introduced after black death 1600’s – English Civil Wars 1689 – Bill of Rights o Division between Parliament and Monarch o Statute law will always overrule common law 1776 – Rule of Law introduced Important Acts: 1679 – Habeas Corpus Act 1707 – Act of Union (Scotland) 1800 – Act of Union (Ireland) 1832 – Great Reform Act o Sorted out MP issues o Start of popular democracy 1949 – Parliament Act 1972 – European Communities Act 1998 – Human Rights Act Important Cases: 1607 – Case of Prohibitions (Prohibitions Del Roy) 1610 – Case of Proclamations 1637 – Ship Money Case 1765 – Entick v Carrington 1976 – AG v Jonathan Cape 1978 – Madzimbamuto v Ladner-Burke 2005 – R (Jackson) v AG 2005 – A v HO (Belmarsh Detention and Torture cases) EU (EC) Law: Regulations Treaties Directives Conventions: Not enforceable by courts Not legally binding
The Rule of Law
Definition: Everyone is subject to the law o Including governments o Including monarchs Philosophical History: Aristotle – “the Rule of Law is preferable to that of any human being” Natural Law: Ancient Greeks Cicero – “One eternal and unchangeable law will be valid for all nations and for all times” Thomas Aquinas – Christian Natural Law Political Theory: John Locke – “Wherever law ends, tyranny begins” Thomas Paine – “In America, law is king” The Nature of Law: Is law always good Waldron – The Rule of Law nothing more than “Hooray for our side!” Morally Neutral Rule of Law – Knife analogy; can cut a cake or kill a man Qualities of the Rule of Law The law should be perspective, open, clear and stable The making of particular law should be guided by stable and clear rules The independence of the judiciary must be guaranteed The principles of natural justice must be observed Arising Obligations Do we have to abide by unjust laws Is there a right to destroy law Is there a duty to disobey law in extreme cases Practical Effects – AV Dicey: No person is to be punished except for a distinct breach of law No detention without trial No arbitrariness No retrospective application of law Government action can be reviewed (Judicial Review) Entick v Carrington Legal process should be accessible and procedurally fair Equality of all persons before the law o Children cannot commit crime o Diplomatic immunity o MP privileges o Crown privileges Parliamentary Sovereignty Definition:
Parliament is the supreme authority and nothing can challenge it
Political Constitutionalism: Elected politicians should be the ones deciding principles of the state Judges are not elected and have an agenda of their own Parliamentary Sovereignty is the decisive principle Legal Constitutionalism: Courts are essential to limit the power of government Democracy is important but could equal a dictatorship if not controlled properly Rule of Law is the decisive principle Earl of Shaftesbury: “The Parliament of England is that supreme and absolute power which gives life and motion to the English Government” Principles: Each Parliament is sovereign during its lifetime Parliament can enact any law concerning any matter Parliament can repeal or amend any existing law Parliament can enact retrospective legislation (War Damages Act 1965) Courts can only interpret legislation and apply it Parliament is not bound by international law domestically Constraints on Parliament are political, not legal Parliament can decide its composition and length What can the courts review: Resolution by one House of Parliament Secondary Legislation on the grounds of o Exceeding authority o Incorrect procedure Expressed Repeal: Each Parliament must be able to unmake any laws No Parliament is bound by its predecessors Implied Repeal: Logical extension of principle Parliament can pass a new act which impliedly repeals any conflicting acts Problems: Act of Union (Scotland) – England and Scotland will forever be Great (could change) McCornick v Lord Advocate – Parliamentary Sovereignty was debated European Union Institutions: The European Council – Heads of member states
The European Commission – Legislation proposers The Council of the European Union – Ministers The European Parliament – Makes law
Principles: Principle of Conferral – EU is allowed to do anything within the confines of the treaty Principle of Subsidiarity – EU should only do things which are necessary European Court of Justice: 1 Judge per member state 9 Advocate-Generals 1 President Role of ECJ: Interprets the law after being referred to a specific case Bulmer v Bollinger – Denning said o Only when necessary and conclusive to a case o Keep in mind delay, cost and burden to ECJ Samex – Bingham said o ECJ has panoramic view o ECJ is better with languages Sources of UK Constitution: Primary Legislation o The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 1953 o The Treaty on the European Union 1993 Secondary Legislation o Regulations – Binding on all Member States o Directives – Binding on Member States which it addressed o Decisions – Binding to whom it is addressed Direct Effect: Regulations o Vertical Direct Effect – Van Gend en Loos o Horizontal Direct Effect – SABENA Directives o Vertical Direct Effect – Van Duyn v Home Office o Horizontal Direct Effect – Marshall v Southampton Area Health Aut Supremacy EC Law is Supreme – Costa v ENEL Factortame Case – UK finally accepted supremacy of EC Law (dis-applied Merchant Shipping Act)...