Title | Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp |
---|---|
Course | Contracts II |
Institution | Liberty University |
Pages | 1 |
File Size | 53.4 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 72 |
Total Views | 134 |
Case Brief...
Contracts II
Class 3
Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp. Court: Court of Appeals of New York (1953)
Facts: Crabtree (PL) began working for Elizabeth Arden (DF) in 1947. DF posed an interesting offer to the PL, granting him $20K for the first six months, $25K for the next six months, and $30K going forward after. After the first six months, PL got his $25K raise, but six months after, did not get his $30K raise.
Issues: What constitutes a sufficient connection permitting the unsigned papers
Procedural History: The lower court affirmed the grant of summary judgement.
Judgement: Affirmed in favor of the Plaintiff.
Reasoning: There must be a sufficient connection between the papers, evidenced by a reference to them in the same subject matter or transaction. Oral testimony may be admitted showing this connection. Though it may present a danger of perjury or fraud, but the court chooses instead to run that risk in cases where there is no ground for doubt.
Rules: There must be sufficient connection between the papers, evidenced by a reference to them in the same subject matter or transaction....