Title | Criminology Rational Choice Theory |
---|---|
Author | Emily Lubas |
Course | Introduction to Criminology |
Institution | The University of Tampa |
Pages | 5 |
File Size | 146.6 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 83 |
Total Views | 152 |
Rational choice, General deterrence, Specific Deterrence, Incapacitation
...
Chapter 4 Rational Choice Theory Development of Rational Choice Theory -
Classical School
-
- Cesare Beccaria Decision is made to either commit crime or not commit crime According to Rational Choice Theory, offenders engage in a “cost benefit analysis” when engaging in crime Factors that impact decision
- Probability of being caught/punished - Fear of Punishment - Risk of losing respect, feelings of guilt, damaged reputation - Risk of apprehension vs the profit/pleasure of crime Rational Choice Theory -
Crime is both offense-specific and offender-specific
-
Offense-specific - The view that an offender reacts selectively to the characteristics of a particular criminal act - Offender-specific - The view that offenders evaluate their skills, motives, needs, and fears before deciding to commit the criminal act Concepts of Rational Choice Crime vs Criminality STRUCTURING CRIMINALITY - Parental and Peer influence -
Need for excitement and thrills
-
Thrill vs Profit Economic need and opportunity Diminished chance of legitimate labor opportunities Reality vs Perception
-
- Competence STRUCTURING CRIME - Choosing the place of crime - Familiarity -
Choosing targets
-
Attractive targets Escape Tactics for effective evasion
Rational Choice Theory: The Evidence - It is easy to illustrate that crimes are products of rational, objective thought when they involve ongoing criminal conspiracy centered on economic gain. BUT… - Is drug use rational? - Use vs Dealing - Is violence rational? - Various types/reasons for violent behavior - Is hate crime rational? -
- Evidence of 3 trigger factors Is sex crime rational? - Evidence of rational behavior for men who solicit sex workers - Various types of sex crimes
-
In sum, RCT states that crime is not a random event but the product of calculation and planning designed to provide the would-be criminal with an overall benefit - Criminal propensity is neither static nor invariable, but subject to the perceived availability of benefits and the absence of penalties - Evidence to support RCT across all forms of illegal activities - Fear of apprehension and punishment only way to control criminal behavior
-
Critiques of Rational Choice Theory - Overemphasis on individual choice with little regard for the role of social factors. - Does not consider the impact of emotional states or psychopharmacological aids. - Assumes everyone is equally capable of rational decision making.
- Individuals are not the best at realistic appraisals of risk and reward. - Target hardening à Displacement - Other than punishment and lack of rewards, what else prevents people from committing criminal behavior? Situational Crime Prevention - Situational Crime Prevention - View that crime is not simply a matter of motivation, but also opportunities -
-
Seeks to reduce or eliminate particular crimes in a specific setting Criminal acts can be prevented if: - Potential targets are carefully guarded. - The means to commit crime are controlled. - Potential offenders are carefully monitored. Crime Prevention Strategies - Increase the effort needed to commit crime - Increase the risk of committing crime - Crime discouragers
-
Reduce rewards of crime Induce guilt: increase shame
-
Reduce provocation
- Remove excuses Situational Crime Prevention: The Evidence - Hidden benefits - Diffusion -
Discouragement
-
Hidden costs - Displacement - Extinction - Replacement General Deterrence -
Fear of criminal penalties convinces potential law violators that pains of crime outweigh its benefits. General deterrence is achieved if legal sanctions are (or are perceived as) severe, certain, and swift Crime can be controlled by increasing the real or perceived threat of criminal punishment Perception and Deterrence - The actual chance and the perception that punishment will be forthcoming influence criminality. -
-
Perception of punishment appears to change and evolve over time, shaped by a potential offender’s experience and personality. - Some individuals and classes of offenders are more deterrable than others. Marginal and Restrictive Deterrence Marginal deterrence refers to relative effectiveness of punishments. Restrictive deterrence (partial deterrence) refers to situations in which the threat of punishment can reduce but not eliminate the frequency, severity, and duration of a crime. Punishment and Deterrence - Certainty of Punishment - Research shows a direct relationship between crime rates and certainty of punishment. -
-
Severity of Punishment - Little evidence that strict punishments alone can reduce criminal activities - Certainty, rather than severity, is key to deterring criminal behaviors. Swiftness of Punishment - Deterrent effect of law is neutralized if there is a significant lag between apprehension and punishment
- Court delays General Deterrence: The Evidence - Evaluating General Deterrence - Rationality
-
System effectiveness Criminals discount punishments
- Some offenders – and some crimes – are more “deterrable” than others - Deterrence alone is not effective - How do we explain high recidivism rates/chronic offending? - Crimes of compulsion Specific Deterrence -
The view that criminal sanctions should be so powerful that offenders will never repeat their criminal acts
-
- Longer incarceration may delay recidivism Specific deterrence focuses on the individual, while general deterrence focuses on more broad measures Mixed Evidence of Effectiveness - Harshest treatment may increase rather than reduce crime -
Punishment may breed defiance rather than deterrence Stigma of harsh punishment labels people Harshest punishments may cause psychological problems Effect is negligible in neighborhoods where almost everyone has criminal record
Incapacitation -
Incapacitation Effect -
-
The idea that keeping offenders in confinement will eliminate the risk of their committing further offenses - Today, more than 1 in every 100 adults is behind bars Does it work? - Advocates argue that declining crime rates is associated with increase incarceration rate -
Significant, positive relationship between incarceration and recidivism - Prisonization effect - Former inmates commit more crimes once released - Tipping point Policy Implications of Choice Theory Theory Rational choice
Major Premise
Strengths
Research Focus
Law-violating behavior occurs after Explains why high-risk people do
Offences patterns-where,
offenders weigh information on not constantly engage in crime. their personal needs and the Relates theory to crime control situational factors involved in the policy. It is not limited by class
when, and how crime takes place.
difficulty and risk of committing a crime.
or other social variables.
General deterrence
Specific Deterrence
People will commit crime if they perceive that the benefits outweigh
Shows the relationship between crime and punishment. Suggests
Perception of punishment, effect of legal sanctions,
the risks. Crime is a function of the severity, certainty, and speed of punishment.
a real solution to crime
probability of punishment, and crime rates.
If punishment is severe enough, criminals will not repeat their
Provides a strategy to reduce crime
Recidivism, repeat offending, punishment type, and crime
Recognizes the role that opportunity plays in criminal behavior. Provides a solution to chronic offending.
Prison population and crime rates, sentence length, and crime.
illegal acts. Incapacitation
Keeping known criminals out of circulation will reduce crime rates
Criminal Justice and Rational Choice Theory -
Although research on the core principles of choice theory and deterrence theories produces mixed results, these models have had an important impact on criminal justice system crime prevention strategies. - Crackdowns- the concentration of police resources on particular problem areas to eradicate or displace criminal behavior - Focused deterrence- view that police can deter crime by using every strategy possible. Directly interacting with -
offenders and communicating clear consequences for criminal behavior Focused deterrence activates or pulls every deterrent “lever” “Three-strikes and you’re out” laws - Appeals to public sentiments but may be a premature method High security or “supermax” prisons...