Title | Exercises 2 & 4 - Unit 5 |
---|---|
Author | Temur Ergashev |
Course | Políticas Económicas |
Institution | Universidad de Murcia |
Pages | 2 |
File Size | 104.9 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 52 |
Total Views | 132 |
Download Exercises 2 & 4 - Unit 5 PDF
ERGASHEV TEMUR
Exercises : No 2 & No 4 – UNIT 5 Exercise #4
Supplier A
Supplier B
Category
Product
Company
Service
Weight
40%
20%
20%
Sales Staff 20%
Evaluation Points
4+2+2
2+2+2+2+2+2+2
3+3+2
2+2+2
In Total Value
8
14
8
6
3.2
2.8
1.6
Category
Product
Company
Service
Weight Evaluation Points
40%
20%
20%
1.2 Sales Staff 20%
4+2+2
2+2+4+3+3+2+2
3+3+3
2+2+3
8 3.2
18 3.6
9 1.8
7 1.4
In Total Value
Total
100% 36 8.8 Total
100% 42 10
-Answer; as it is clear, the Value Results, “Supplier B” is more valuable in order to be chosen as the Supplier with 10 points, while “Supplier A” holds less 8.8 value points. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Exercise #2 Category
Amortization
Renting
FC
€ 2,000
€ 2,000
VC
-
-
Price / unit Unit VCU= VCU=
Manufacturing Sales cost (5%fixed) commission € 500 € 9,500
€ 15 1000 Total VC/Total Unit 11,000 / 1000 =
€ 11
/unit
€ 1,500
In Total € 4,500 € 11,000
ERGASHEV TEMUR
Possible Total Revenue = P * Q = 15 * 1000 = €15000 Production Cost = FC + (VCu * Q) = 4,500 + (11 * 1,000) = €15 500 Total Units = FC / (P – VCu) = 4500 (15-11) = 1,125 units
-Answer; It is more profitable to buy it from an outside supplier who has been quoting a price of 15€ per unit....