Title | EXP 2 - laboratory experiment report ferrous |
---|---|
Course | Ferrous Metallurgy |
Institution | Fanshawe College |
Pages | 8 |
File Size | 248.3 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 50 |
Total Views | 128 |
laboratory experiment report ferrous...
COURSE:
MATS-1021
COURSE NAME:
FERROUS METALLURGY
SECTION NUMBER:
05
EXPERIMENT NO:
2
TITLE:
MICROSTRUCTURE OF HOT ROLLED STEEL
NAME:
PARTH PATEL
STUDENT NUMBER:
0815754
CLASS:
PEM-E
SUBMISSION DATE:
27/02/17
Metallography Metallography and Phase High-strength Low-alloy Steel (0.2% C) Specim Transverse Section % nital. Pearlite Ferrite Magni Phase Identification:50% ferrite and 50
Identification
of
Longitudinal Section
QUESTIONS STEEL DESIGNATION
COLD/HOT ROLLED
% ELONGATION BRINELL %CARBON in 50 mm (2 in) HARDNESS (HB) CONTENT
1008
HOT ROLLED
30
86
COLD ROLLED
20
95
HOT ROLLED
25
116
COLD ROLLED
15
126
HOT ROLLED
20
137
1018
1030
0.10
0.15-.20
0.27-0.40
1040
COLD ROLLED
12
149
HOT ROLLED
18
149
COLD ROLLED
12
170
0.37-0.44
Table: % Elongation and Brinell hardness for hot rolled and cold rolled steel
Graph for microstructure by Hot Rolled Process 35
160 149
30 30
137
25
116
20
20
140
120
86
18 80
15 60 10 40 5
0 0.1 1008
20
0.27 1030
0.2 1018
% Carbon % carbon
%elongation
Brinell Hardness
We observe that as carbon content increases, %elongation decreases while Brinell Hardness increases.
0.37 0 1040
BHN
% Elongation
100 20
Graph for microstructure by cold rolled process 180 170 160
25
149
20 20
140 126 15
15
100
95 12
12 80
BHN
% Elongation
120
10 60 40
5
20 0 0.1 1008
0.27 1030
0.2 1018
0.37 0 1040
% Carbon % carbon
%elongation
Brinell hardness
We observe that as carbon content increases, %elongation decreases while Brinell Hardness increases.
Hot and Rolled steel 450
160 149
400
170
137
140
149 350
120
300 250 126
80
116 200
60 150 100 18 20 20 5030
40
95
86 12 15 12 20
20 0.3 0.18 0.4 0.1
0
Axis Title 1008
1018
1040
1030
0.3 0.18 0.4 0.1
0
BHN
%Elongation
100
Conclusion: By performing experiment: By performing this experiment and watching it under the microscope we observe that the microstructure in both the views (Longitudinal and Transverse) are same and doesn’t show much difference visible to eyes at 400×. However, by further study through different sources I have learnt that there is little difference in the micro-structure.
By study of Graphs: By studying the table and graph for four different steels (1008, 1018, 1030, 1040) we observe that as carbon content increases for the microstructure of hot rolled process, %Elongation decreases while Brinell hardness increases. Same is the case with microstructure of cold rolled process, as the carbon content increases, %Elongation decreases while Brinell hardness increases. But the % increase in brinell hardness shown by microstructure due to cold rolled process is more than the microstructure due to hot rolled process.
REFERENCES 1) ASM handbook (1990) Published by ASM International Handbook Committee Table number: 09 Page number: 262
2) Carbon Steel Product Guide. (n.d.). Retrieved September 29, 2016, from https://alcobrametals.com/guides/carbon-steel#1018...