Exported-text-2 - online quiz answers PDF

Preview

Summary

online quiz answers...

Description

https://moodle.telt.unsw.edu.au/h5p/embed.php?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmoodle.telt.unsw.edu.au %2Fpluginfile.php%2F6401961%2Fmod_h5pactivity%2Fpackage%2F0%2FMerits%2520Review %2520with%2520Emeritus%2520Professor%2520Robin %2520Creyke.h5p&preventredirect=1&component=mod_h5pactivity QUESTION Robin links the 'rules of evidence' with the (potentially) more informal nature of merits review tribunals. Why do you think they are related? Enter your response in the field below. Responses and feedback (where available) can be exported at the conclusion of the module.

Feedback / Sample response Answer Revisit [3.4.11] onwards of the text book. Especially in a jurisdiction where more people might be selfrepresented, relaxing the rules of evidence allows for tribunals to be less formal. Also, are we thinking differently about evidence when we are looking for the 'correct and preferable decision' compared to an adversarial matter in a court?

QUESTION Robin states that she has tried to write about tribunals needing to develop a 'distinct persona'. What do you think she means by that and why might tribunals need that? Enter your response in the field below. Responses and feedback (where available) can be exported at the conclusion of the module.

Feedback / Sample response Answer Robin has written an article on this. From her perspective, tribunals need to focus on what makes them distinctive: the merits function, diversity of membership, flexibility of process, accessibility, and costeffectiveness. A PDF of this article is available on Moodle: R Creyke, 'Tribunals - Carving out the Philosophy of their Existence: The Challenge for the 21st Century'(2012) AIAL Forum No.71,19-33.

QUESTION

Robin stated here that the Veterans’ Review Board was excluded from the AAT amalgamation for ‘political reasons’. What does she mean by this? How is the scope of a tribunal determined? Enter your response in the field below. Responses and feedback (where available) can be exported at the conclusion of the module.

Feedback / Sample response Answer Revisit [3.3.34] onwards of the text book. Categories of decision that are subject to merits review are defined by legislation.

QUESTION Before answering this question, read the Saturday Paper article provided on Moodle (‘Political stacking leaves appeals tribunal in chaos’) Why is appointment of tribunal members a ‘political issue’? Note your answer to this question down and we will discuss this issue briefly in Class 1, Week 3. We will also discuss the instructions for your mid-semester assignment. Enter your response in the field below. Responses and feedback (where available) can be exported at the conclusion of the module....