Title | Family Law Exam - Divorce |
---|---|
Course | Law |
Institution | The University of Warwick |
Pages | 3 |
File Size | 113.4 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 37 |
Total Views | 136 |
Essay notes on Divorce...
(A) Petition for divorce 1. Requirements Ground for divorce
There is only a single ground for divorce “irretrievable breakdown of marriage” S.1(1) MCA 1973
5 facts
The petitioner must satisfy the ground by proving one of the 5 facts S1(2) MCA 1973 adultery unreasonable behaviour desertion for 2 years separation for 2 years separation for 5 years
2. 5 Facts under S.1(2) MCA 1973 Adultery
Respondent committed adultery – petitioner finds it intolerable to live with respondent S.1(2)(a) MCA 1973 no requirement that the “intolerable to live with” criterion to be due to the adultery o Cleary v Cleary The Q on “intolerability” is SUBJECTIVE o Ie: does the petitioner find it intolerable to live with the Resp? o Goodrich v Goodrich NOTE: same sex couples CANNOT rely on the fact of adultery they can only rely on unreasonable behaviour S.1(6) MCA 1973 Unreasonable behaviour
Resp behaved in such a way that the petitioner could not reasonably be expected to live with the Resp Objective test: o Ie: the behaviour must be a behaviour that a rightthinking person would think was such that the petitioner could not live with the Resp + take into account of circumstances + characters and personalities of parties o Livingstone-Stallard v Livingstone-Stallard Requires the court to consider the character and personalities of both parties
Desertion for 2 years
o Ash v Ash o Both parties were violent – hence App cannot prove this ground Court must disregard cumulative periods of less than 6 months if the parties have lived together after the final incident of unreasonable behaviour – when determining if the petitioner can reasonably be expected to live with the respondent
An unjustifiable withdrawal from cohabitation WITHOUT CONSENT OF SPOUSE
S.1(1)(c) MCA 1973 MUST show actual separation Le Brocq v Le Brocq Wife continued to cook husband’s meals hence, no desertation Separation for 2 years
Parties lived apart for a CONTINUOUS PERIOD of 2 years Respondent MUST consent to the divorce
S.1(1)(d) MCA 1973 However, the parties can still live under the same roof, as long as they lives separate lives Fuller v Fuller Husband and Wife stayed under the same roof – but slept in separate rooms Wife did his washing and cooked his meals But they clearly treated the marriage at an end Separation for 5 years
Parties lived apart for a CONTINUOUS PERIOD of 5 years NO REQUIREMENT FOR RESP’S CONSENT
S.1(1)(e) MCA 1973 Limitation: Decree may not be granted if it would cause hardship to the Resp + wrong in all circumstances to dissolve the marriage Banik v Banik Status of divorcee would cause hardship for Hindi wife
3. Procedure
Only able to petition if married for at least ONE YEAR! 2 stages: o decree nisi; o decree absolute decree nisi CANNOT be made absolute until 6 months have passed o S.1(5) MCA 1973 o to allow any objections to the divorce to be made if decree nisi not made absolute D may apply 3 months from the day the petitioner could have applied Eg case: Kim v Morris o After decree nisi – the couple reconciled and cohabitated for 4 years o When the relationship broke down again, court held she had to petition for a fresh divorce o Her decree nisi did not represent genuine breakdown of the relationship
Civil Partnerships Under the S.44(1) Civil Partnership Act Application for dissolution order can be made on the ground that the CP has broken down irretrievably Similar to divorce, the applicant has to prove 4 facts to support that ground S.44(5)(a)
Unreasonable behaviour
S.44(5)(b)
Separation for 2 years
S.44(5)(c)
Separation for 5 years
S.44(5)(d)
Desertion for 2 years...