Title | FINS 2624 Problem Set 2 Solutions |
---|---|
Author | Ruth Thorburn |
Course | Portfolio Management |
Institution | University of New South Wales |
Pages | 8 |
File Size | 212.2 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 2 |
Total Views | 135 |
Download FINS 2624 Problem Set 2 Solutions PDF
FINS2624 PROBLEM SET 2 SOLUTIONS Question 1. Using Bond A, we know that the yield to maturity for a 1-year investment, y1, satisfies: 95.24
100 100 → 1 5% 1 95.24
Using Bond B, we solve for the quantity y2 that satisfies: 110 10 1 1
107.42
110 10 1 1.05
107.42
→ 6% Using Bond C, 140.51
20 20 120 1 1 1
140.51
20
1.05
120 20 1.06 1
5%
Finally, using Bond D, 85.48
100 → 4% 1
Graphically, the yield curve is as follows:
TermStructure 7 6
Yield(%)
5 4 3 2 1 0 0
1
2
3
Year
4
5
Question 2. The no-arbitrage price of Bond E, by the present value equation, is: 25 125 1 1 Using y1 = 5% and y2 = 6% from Q1, this no-arbitrage price is:
125 25 135.059 1.06 1.05
which is lower than the given market price of $136. Bond E is therefore overpriced. Thus, to exploit the arbitrage opportunity, we must short Bond E and buy some combination of Bonds A and B.
Shorting 1 unit of Bond E:
0
0
X*($10)
0
Total
X*($110) 2
1 Y*($100)
Y*(‐95.24)
Time Short 1 unit of Bond E Buy X units of Bond B Buy Y units of Bond A
2
1
X*(‐107.42)
Buying Y units of Bond A:
‐$125
‐$25
136
Buying X units of Bond B:
2
1
0
0 136 X*(-107.42) Y*(-95.24)
1 -25 X*(10) Y*(100)
2 -125.0 X*(110.0) 0
?
$0
$0
Match cash flow at time 2: 125 110 →
125 1.136 110
Now, match cash flow at time 1: 25 10 100, 1.136 25 1.136 10 100 25 1.136 100 → 0.136 100 Thus, the arbitrage portfolio is as follows: - Short sell 1 unit of Bond E - Buy 1.136 units of Bond B (at a price of 1.136*107.42 = $122.03) - Buy 0.1364 units of Bond A (at a price of 0.136*95.24 = $12.95)
Updated cash flow timelines: Shorting 1 unit of Bond E:
1
0
0
0
Total
1.136*($10)
1.136*($110) 2
1
0.136*(‐95.24)
Time Short 1 unit of Bond E Buy X units of Bond B Buy Y units of Bond A
2
1
1.136*(‐107.42)
Buying 0.136 units of Bond A:
‐$125
‐$25
136
Buying 1.136 units of Bond B:
2
0.136*($100)
0
0 136 -122.03 -12.95
1 -25 11.36 13.64
2 -125.0 125 0
$1.02
$0
$0
Question 3. Method 1 Using Bond X, we have: 105.6
110 10 … … … 1 1 1
and similarly, using Bond Y, 123.86
120 20 … … … 2 1 1
Multiplying both sides of (2) by 110/120 gives: 123.86
110
120
2200 1 110 … … … 3 120 1 1
Subtracting (1) from (3) gives: 123.86
2200 1 110 10 105.6 120 120 1
This equation has only one unknown y1. We can solve that y1 ≈ 0.04975856 ≈ 0.05 Substituting the solution of y1 into (1): 105.6
110 10 → 0.07 1.05 1
Method 2 Buy 1 unit of Bond Y and 120/110 units of Bond X: Time Buy 1 unit of Bond Y Sell (120/110) units of Bond X Total
0 -123.86 115.2 -8.66
1 20 -10.91 9.09
Calculate y1: 8.66
9.09 → 4.97% 1
Next, calculate y2 using Bond X’s price: 105.6
1 1
110 10 → 0.07 1.05 1
2 120 120 0
Question 4. [a] Liquidity risk If you intend to invest for only 1 year but hold a 2-year bond, you have to sell the bond in 1 year. So, your return in one year will be: 1-year HPR = (P1 + c1)/P0 = (P1 + 10)/P0 (you should be able to calculate P0 given the information). And P1 = (c2 + FV)/(1 + 1y2) = 110/(1 + 1y2) is unknown at t = 0, so is P1 and HPR. Hence holding 2-year bond is risky here – you are exposed to liquidity risk (you find it difficult to sell when you want to).
1y2
[b] Reinvestment risk If you intend to invest for only 3 years but hold a 2-year bond, you have to reinvest the proceedings from this bond at the end of year 2 for another year. Let’s assume your 2-year HPR of investing in that 2-year bond is HRP2 = [c1*(1 + 1y2) + c2 + FV]/P0 – 1. Now at the end of year 2, you have to reinvest the total cash flows from this 2-year bond (i.e., c1*(1 + 1y2) + c2 + FV) to the end of year 3 at the rate 2y3. And your 3-year HPR = (1+ HRP2)*(1+2y3) – 1. Since 2y3 will be unknown until end of year 2, so is your 3-year HPR – you are exposed to reinvestment risk. (Note:to calculate 2-year HPR, you have to calculate your aggregate cash flows at the end of year 2, which requires the information of 1y2 to reinvest the year-1 coupon to the end of year 2. So 2-year HPR of the bond is also unknown at time 0 - but will surely be known at the end of year 2. So technically speaking, even for an investor with 2-year horizon, she is still exposed to reinvestment risk if she invests in a 2-year COUPON bond – and even worse if she has a 3-year investment horizon in this question. An investor with 2-year horizon will not bear the reinvestment risk if she invests in a 2-year zero-coupon bond.)
Question 5. Suppose we have $1 in period 0, given the spot rates ys, yt and the forward rate sft, s...