Title | Forces and Vector - Lab 3 |
---|---|
Author | Hapi Jackson |
Course | General Physics I |
Institution | North Carolina Central University |
Pages | 6 |
File Size | 242.9 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 15 |
Total Views | 140 |
Lab 3...
Force and Vectors Lab9/16/19
Hapshepsut Jackson, Lettia Spruill, and Donazhia Everett.
Theory/Introduction
DATA AND RESULTS The results of our experiment seem to be very accurate the given the values of the percent error and absolute percent calculated. The experimental, graphical and analytical values were almost all the same value. Data Table 1:
Force
Mass (kg)
Force (N)
Direction
F1
0.100
0.98
20.0
F2
0.200
1.96
90.0
.260
2.55
248
Equilibrant FE1 1
Resultant FR 1
.250
2.473
68.135
Analytical Data 1: Anayltical Solution Force
Mass (kg)
Force(N)
F1
0.100
0.982
F2
0.200
1.96
Resultant
.250
2.48
Direction
20.08 90.08 68.2
Xcomponen t
Ycomponen t
0.921
0.335
0
1.96
0.921
2.30
Graphical Solution 1:
Graphical Solution Force
Mass (kg)
Force (N)
F1
0.100
.982
F2 Resultant
2
0.200 .255
1.96 2.48
Direction 20.0 90.0
68.0
Part 1. Error Calculations Percent Error magnitude Experimental compared to Analytical =__0____% Percent Error magnitude Graphical compared to Analytical = ___2____ % Absolute Error in angle Experimental compared to Analytical =___0____ degrees Absolute Error in angle Graphical compared to Analytical = _____.135__degrees
Data Table 2:
Force
Mass (kg)
Force (N)
Direction
F3
0.150
1.47
30.0
F4
0.200
1.96
100.0
F5
0.100
.981
145.0
.340
3.33
265.0
.328
3.23
87.7
Equilibrant FE1 Resultant FR 1
Analytical Data 2: Analytical Solution Force
Mass (kg)
Force(N)
Direction
X component
F3
0.150
1.47
30.0
1.27
3
Y component 0.735
F4
0.200
1.96
100.0
0.340
1.93
F5
0.100
0.981
145.0
0.803
0.562
.129
3.225
Resultant
.328
3.22
87.7
Graphical Solution 2:
Graphical Solution Force
Mass (kg)
Force (N)
Direction
F3
0.150
1.47
30.0
F4
0.200
1.96
100.0
F5
0.100
0.98
145.0
Resultant
0.33
3.30
87.0
Part 2. Error Calculations Percent Error magnitude Experimental compared to Analytical =__0____% Percent Error magnitude Graphical compared to Analytical = ____.609___ % Absolute Error in angle Experimental compared to Analytical =____0___ degrees Absolute Error in angle Graphical compared to Analytical = ____.7___degrees
CONCLUSION 4
We were able to figure out the resultant vector by vector addition with two applied forces. The percent error magnitude experimental compared to was analytical = 0 for both sets of data suggesting that our calculations were very accurate. Absolute error in angle experimental compared too analytical = 0 degrees also emphasizing the accuracy of our calculations. We did not encounter any know errors our results seemed to be very accurate. In terms of challenges, the graphical method was a bit tricky to understand initially but once it was completely understood it was easy to achieve the graphical solution. The purpose of this lab was to gain experience working with vector calculations. The overall accomplishment of this experiment was that we proved that both two and three 2-dimensional vectors can be added accurately; experimentally using a force table; analytically using equations, and graphically using graphical analysis.
5...