Title | Free Movement of Goods (Tutorial notes) |
---|---|
Course | European Internal Market Law |
Institution | Queen's University Belfast |
Pages | 2 |
File Size | 59.5 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 33 |
Total Views | 166 |
Tutorial notes for Free movement of goods...
European Internal Market Law
Free Movement of Goods Tutorial notes
Question 1 Single market; common policies, four freedoms External o Import/export restrictions set at EU level o Import duty – same no matter which point of entry Internal o No customs duties for trade within the EU o No customs or quantitative restrictions Links with ECL o Both function under treaties o Basic structure of EU o Scope of EU law much greater o From the beginning the purpose of the EU is to focus on trade – exists for internal market
Question 2 Important – freedom of movement, no customs limits etc. o Would trade in UK be easier without the EU? o Too many regulations?
Question 3 Beneficial o Beneficial to all member states o Greater product range o Specialisation – economic efficiency o Competition – leads to growth eg. Ryanair – driven prices down, increasing demand for flights Criticisms o Monopolies can dominate o Member states have less power Lack of oversight Question 4 Freedom of goods, persons, services and capital o Goods – actual, concrete goods o Services – more difficult to identify Factors of production need to move freely o Workers and capital – needed for goods and services Freedom of establishment – ability for someone to establish themselves and join the workforce Citizenship of EU o More free movement o Not for economic motivation but because that person has identifiable rights
European Internal Market Law Question 5 Quantitative restriction o Restriction on quantity o Quota o Countries can’t get away with setting these MEE o Not a quantitative restriction o May not be illegal on face o But will have the equivalent effect of a quantitative restriction
Question 6 Basics: result of German law is that French company couldn’t export Cassis to Germany – effectively a ban Law invalid because it’s an MEE Home state is one that produces product Host state is one where the product is sold Regulations of home state apply o If you had to apply regulations of host state it would mean a product would have to be changed for export to each country ECJ felt this was too complicated and ruled that regulations of the home state should apply Mandatory requirements o Allowed to justify rules relating to safety, health and environmental concerns o Not a closed list o Exception to Art. 34 but different to Art. 36
Question 7 Keck o Law: French law not allowing businesses to sell products at a loss Gourmet o Swedish law: can’t advertise alcohol in publications If Keck was followed the court would have said that is affects Swedish and foreign goods equally However, the court said it was an MEE because the Swedes know about Swedish alcohol already but not about foreign alcohol Static arrangement – doesn’t affect market access Dynamic arrangement – does affect market access...