Title | How to Answer Exam Questions for Criminal Law |
---|---|
Author | Hollie Stevenson |
Course | Criminal Law |
Institution | University of Aberdeen |
Pages | 1 |
File Size | 53.4 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 63 |
Total Views | 123 |
Download How to Answer Exam Questions for Criminal Law PDF
How to Answer Exam Questions Essay style question: Structure: o Introduction o Main section argument o Reference case and statutory authorities o Conclusion Example: Discuss the importance of the decision in Finlayson v HM Advocate 1978 SLT 1 o Start with an outline of the case Accused injected victim with illegal drugs Victim taken to hospital and put on life support Life support machine was eventually turned of Is accused responsible for death- Novus Actus Interveniens o Explain the decision The court held that Finlayson's argument was incorrect and unlawful. Switching of life support machine did not break the chain of causation It was not a novus actus interveniens. o Give an account of the ratio decendi The court did not have the decide whether 'brain death' amount to death for the purposes of the law of homicide Finlaysons actions both caused Wilsons brain to die and his heart to stop beating making him responsible for his death, so he was rightly charged with homicide. Scenario Question: Read problem question carefully and be sure to address the question asked e.g. Is John liable for the culpable homicide of Paul? Ensure you cover all the points raised in the question Approaching a Scenario Question: o The same approach always been taken i.e 1. Identify the crime (actus reus and mens rea) citing statutory authority for a statutory ofence or case authority for a common law crime 2. Consider the 'evidence' presented- does it satisfy the criminal liability? 3. Relate knowledge and understanding of the law and legal interpretation to the facts to develop a persuasive argument 4. Conclusion o Introduction/Overview: 1. The elements of any crime are: Act + Intention - Defence 2. Actus reus is the harmful and blameworthy conduct- can be determined by actions, omissions etc 3. Mens rea is the intention or moral blameworthiness 4. Defence- partial or complete and the consequences of proving Citing case authority: The case name is important If using the case for the definition you do not need a long narrative describing the circumstances Make reference to circumstances of a case is very relevant to a question...