Title | HW 4 -Beavin - hw#4 |
---|---|
Author | M B |
Course | Health Economics |
Institution | California University of Pennsylvania |
Pages | 5 |
File Size | 135.5 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 227 |
Total Views | 669 |
Unit 4: Homework ECO 765 Suppose Bob has income of $18,000. There is a 20% chance that Bob will get sick and have to spend $10,000 of his income on a treatment. Suppose Bob’s income-utility relationship is given by: Where I am Bob’s income.푈(퐼) = √퐼a. Use the facts above to complete the table below ...
Unit 4: Homework ECO 765 1. Suppose Bob has income of $18,000. There is a 20% chance that Bob will get sick and have to spend $10,000 of his income on a treatment. Suppose Bob’s income-utility relationship is given by: Where I am Bob’s income. � (�) = √� a.
b.
Use the facts above to complete the table below to find Bob’s utility for various levels of income, along with his marginal utility associated with increases in his income. Use the given values to help you get started. What do you notice about the shape of this curve? a. The curve of the utility function implies that this person is risk averse, according to the text a sure amount would always be preferred over a risky bet having the same expected value 160.0 140.0 120.0 Utility
100.0 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 0
5000
10000
15000
20000
Wealth
c.
b. What does this imply about Bob’s attitudes towards risk? Bob is Risk Averse (Risk Avoiding).
Utility
Marginal Utility = change in utility per extra $2,000
0
0.0
0.0
2000
44.7
44.7
4000
63.7
18.5
6000
77.5
14.3
8000
89.4
11.9
10000
100.0
10.6
12000
109.5
9.5
14000
118.3
8.8
16000
126.5
8.2
18000
134.2
7.7
20000
141.4
7.22
22000
148.3
6.88
Income
2.
3.
4.
What is Bob’s expected income, given that he faces a chance of illness? What is the actuarially fair premium for Bob’s circumstance? Bob's income=$18,000 probability of illness=0.2 probability of being healthy=0.8 expenses during illness=$10,000 Bob's expected income=0.2*($18,000-$10,000)+0.8*($18,000) = 0.2*$8,000+0.8*$18,000 = $1,600+$14,400 =$16,000 Actuarially fair premium=0.2*$10,000=$2,000 How happy is Bob if he doesn’t buy any insurance? (Hint: expected utility!) Compare this to how happy Bob is if he can buy full insurance at the actuarially fair premium....will Bob want to buy the insurance? b. Bob's expected utility with insurance=0.2 sqrt18000-2000 +0.8√18000 =0.2* √16000 + 0.8√18000 =0.2*126.5+0.8*134.2=132.66 Bob's expected utility with no insurance=0.2*√8000 + 0.8√18000 =0.2*89.4+0.8*134.2 =125.24 As Bob's expected utility is more when he takes insurance of fair premium so, he should take definitely take the insurance policy
Complete the following table to gain further insights and then find the maximum Bob would be willing to pay for full insurance. Does this suggest that an insurance market can exist? Probability of getting sick
Expected Income 1
8000
Utility of expected income
Expected utility
89.4
89.4
0.9
9000
94.9
93.9
0.8
10000
100.0
98.4
0.7
11000
104.9
102.9
0.6
12000
109.5
107.3
0.5
13000
114.0
111.8
0.4
14000
118.3
116.3
0.3
15000
122.5
120.7
0.2
16000
126.5
125.2
0.1
17000
130.4
129.7
0
18000
134.2
134.2
5.
Illustrate Bob’s situation graphically, showing all of the most important features. You don’t have to show every single data point...just enough to convey the main ideas (you can do this by hand or create a graph in Excel)
136.0
126.0
116.0
106.0
96.0
86.0 8000
10000
12000
14000
Utility of expected income
6.
16000
18000
Expected utility
Suppose an insurance company offers a standard contract to everyone. The policy charges a premium of $2,100 and pays out $8,500 to you if you get sick. From Bob’s perspective, is this contract fair? Full? Explain using the definitions of fair and full insurance contracts in the text.
This is considered a fair contract, as it covers some aspect of the damage, but it doesn’t cover the entire damage. As fair insurance covers some percentage of the damage made but not the entire amount fully only up to $8500.
7.
The Akerlof model and its lessons can be directly applied to health insurance markets. In health insurance markets, who is analogous to the car buyers? The car sellers. What would it mean for the health insurance market to “unravel”? Explain what this would look like. The insurance firms are analogous to car buyers and the insurance customers are the car sellers. This market would unravel if no insurance company is willing to offer an insurance contract at any premium for fear of attracting the sickest population to their plans. This is similar to buyers refusing to buy cars at any price for fear of buying care that consumers will buy bad cars.
8.
Who is harmed by asymmetric information in insurance markets? Who is helped? Explain.
9.
Insurance companies are harmed by the asymmetric information, in the health insurance market, the patient has more knowledge of their medical needs which gives them an advantage to buying the health insurance. Policy holders are helped by this and insurance companies are harmed.
Suppose private markets offered insurance contracts that committed people to lifetime insurance. For instance, suppose you purchase a policy when you are young, the premiums are fixed for life, but you must commit to holding the policy your entire life. The insurance company must pay your medical bills for life. What are pros and cons of such a policy? Do you think these sorts of contracts would work in the real world? Why or why not?
These policies definitely have both pros and cons, this policy can lead to a fall in the cost of the fixed premium year after year, or a premium amount as bob ages A pro would be for instance, if Bob signs a contract young and healthy, he will pay the premiums every year for the rest of his life, no matter if Bob is diagnosed with a chronic disease or if he is perfectly healthy. If Bob remains extremely healthy throughout his life, then that means he may want to change insurance companies to pay a smaller premium but will be unable to drop the insurance policy. The reason this would not work in the real world is because the nature of the contract also prevents competition, because these two customers are stuck with their insurer for life then no other company can get their business....