Ibus7322-Rubric(1) - rubic PDF

Preview

Summary

rubic...

Description

Readability 35% To prepare a wellorganized, clear, concise review of the literature on a topic selected by the student. The review should not be a mere précis of research papers, but a genuine synthesis of the literature. As a guide, the review should be prepared as an ‘Opinion’ article suitable for submission to International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. This journal is germane to all the research topics. The most important aims of this assignment are to (1) to read more broadly around the topic

85 Plus

75-84

65-74

50-64

47-49

30-46

0-29

85 to 100 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in

75 to 84 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues

65 to 74 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

50 to 64 points Demonstrates adequate understanding and application of the fundamental concepts of the field of study; develops routine arguments or decisions and provides acceptable justification; communicates information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

47 to 49 points Demonstrates superficial or partial or faulty understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study and limited ability to apply these concepts; presents undeveloped or inappropriate or unsupported arguments; communicates information or ideas with lack of clarity and inconsistent adherence to the conventions of the discipline.

30 to 46 points Demonstrates clear deficiencies in understanding and applying fundamental concepts; communicates information or ideas in ways that are frequently incomplete or confusing and give little attention to the conventions of the discipline.

0 to 29 points Fails to demonstrate most or all of the basic requirements of the course.

under consideration; (2) identify any issues related to the topic; and (3) encourage critical reading of the literature.

Research 15%

defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience. Consistent evidence of substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critically evaluates problems, their solutions and implications.

or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience.

Evidence of conceptually sophisticated thinking e.g. by inclusion of wellargued personal views; and arguments supported by evidence and examples. Student will have consulted a wide range of appropriate sources.

86 to 100 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing

75 to 84 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating

65 to 74 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

50 to 64 points Demonstrates adequate understanding and application of the fundamental concepts of the field of study; develops routine arguments or decisions and provides acceptable justification; communicates information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

47 to 49 points Demonstrates superficial or partial or faulty understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study and limited ability to apply these concepts; presents undeveloped or inappropriate or unsupported arguments; communicates information or ideas with lack of clarity and inconsistent adherence to the conventions of the discipline.

30 to 46 points Demonstrates clear deficiencies in understanding and applying fundamental concepts; communicates information or ideas in ways that are frequently incomplete or confusing and give little attention to the conventions of the discipline.

0 to 29 points Fails to demonstrate most or all of the basic requirements of the course.

Introduction 10% The section introduces the

issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience. Consistent evidence of substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critically evaluates problems, their solutions and implications.

solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience.

86 to 100 points

75 to 84 points Demonstrates

65 to 74 points Demonstrates

50 to 64 points Demonstrates

47 to 49 points Demonstrates

30 to 46 points Demonstrates

0 to 29 points Fails to

topic to the reader and flags the progression through the paper

Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and

substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and

substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

adequate understanding and application of the fundamental concepts of the field of study; develops routine arguments or decisions and provides acceptable justification; communicates information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

superficial or partial or faulty understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study and limited ability to apply these concepts; presents undeveloped or inappropriate or unsupported arguments; communicates information or ideas with lack of clarity and inconsistent adherence to the conventions of the discipline.

clear deficiencies in understanding and applying fundamental concepts; communicates information or ideas in ways that are frequently incomplete or confusing and give little attention to the conventions of the discipline.

demonstrate most or all of the basic requirements of the course.

Syntax 25% Excellent overall standard of presentation, exhibiting a high

in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience. Consistent evidence of substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critically evaluates problems, their solutions and implications.

means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience.

86 to 100 points Demonstrates substantial

75 to 84 points Demonstrates substantial understanding

65 to 74 points Demonstrates substantial understanding

50 to 64 points Demonstrates adequate understanding

47 to 49 points Demonstrates superficial or partial or faulty

30 to 46 points Demonstrates clear deficiencies in

0 to 29 points Fails to demonstrate most or all of

standard of English and clarity of expression. Appropriate use of fonts and effects. Rich, flowing text, pleasure to read with minimal errors. Appropriate separation of text into sections/subsections. Complying to correct academic format for the journal.

understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses

of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication

of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

and application of the fundamental concepts of the field of study; develops routine arguments or decisions and provides acceptable justification; communicates information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

understanding of the fundamental concepts of the field of study and limited ability to apply these concepts; presents undeveloped or inappropriate or unsupported arguments; communicates information or ideas with lack of clarity and inconsistent adherence to the conventions of the discipline.

understanding and applying fundamental concepts; communicates information or ideas in ways that are frequently incomplete or confusing and give little attention to the conventions of the discipline.

the basic requirements of the course.

References 10% Appropriate referencing in a standard format with few if any errors.

a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience. Consistent evidence of substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critically evaluates problems, their solutions and implications.

appropriate to the discipline and the audience.

86 to 100 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental

75 to 84 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the

65 to 74 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the

50 to 64 points Demonstrates adequate understanding and application of the

47 to 49 points Demonstrates superficial or partial or faulty understanding of the

30 to 46 points Demonstrates clear deficiencies in understanding and applying

0 to 29 points Fails to demonstrate most or all of the basic requirements of

concepts of the field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of

field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline

field of study and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

fundamental concepts of the field of study; develops routine arguments or decisions and provides acceptable justification; communicates information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

fundamental concepts of the field of study and limited ability to apply these concepts; presents undeveloped or inappropriate or unsupported arguments; communicates information or ideas with lack of clarity and inconsistent adherence to the conventions of the discipline.

fundamental concepts; communicates information or ideas in ways that are frequently incomplete or confusing and give little attention to the conventions of the discipline.

the course.

communication and the appropriate to audience. the discipline and the audience. Consistent evidence of substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critically evaluates problems, their solutions and implications. Tables and Figs 5% Use of original tables and figures to summarize data from multiple sources to support an argument.

86 to 100 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study

75 to 84 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to

65 to 74 points Demonstrates substantial understanding of fundamental concepts of the field of study and ability to

50 to 64 points Demonstrates adequate understanding and application of the fundamental concepts of the

47 to 49 points Demonstrates superficial or partial or faulty understanding of the fundamental concepts of the

30 to 46 points Demonstrates clear deficiencies in understanding and applying fundamental concepts;

0 to 29 points Fails to demonstrate most or all of the basic requirements of the course.

and ability to apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to

apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline. Frequent evidence of originality in defining and analysing issues or problems and in creating solutions; uses a level, style and means of communication appropriate to the discipline and the audience.

apply these concepts in a variety of contexts; develops or adapts convincing arguments and provides coherent justification; communicates information and ideas clearly and fluently in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

field of study; develops routine arguments or decisions and provides acceptable justification; communicates information and ideas adequately in terms of the conventions of the discipline.

field of study and limited ability to apply these concepts; presents undeveloped or inappropriate or unsupported arguments; communicates information or ideas with lack of clarity and inconsistent adherence to the conventions of the discipline.

communicates information or ideas in ways that are frequently incomplete or confusing and give little attention to the conventions of the discipline.

the discipline and the audience. Consistent evidence of substantial originality and insight in identifying, generating and communicating competing arguments, perspectives or problem solving approaches; critically evaluates problems, their solutions and implications....