Lec17 - prims vs Dijkstra PDF

Preview

Summary

prims vs Dijkstra ...

Description

Introduction to Algorithms 6.046J/18.401J LECTURE 17 Shortest Paths I • Properties of shortest paths • Dijkstra’s algorithm • Correctness • Analysis • Breadth-first search Prof. Erik Demaine November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.1

Paths in graphs Consider a digraph G = (V, E) with edge-weight function w : E → R. The weight of path p = v1 → v2 → L → vk is defined to be k −1

w( p) = ∑ w( vi , vi +1 ) . i =1

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.2

Paths in graphs Consider a digraph G = (V, E) with edge-weight function w : E → R. The weight of path p = v1 → v2 → L → vk is defined to be k −1

w( p) = ∑ w( vi , vi +1 ) . i =1

Example:

v1

4

–2

v2

November 14, 2005

v3

–5

1

v4

v5 w(p) = –2

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.3

Shortest paths A shortest path from u to v is a path of minimum weight from u to v. The shortestpath weight from u to v is defined as δ(u, v) = min{w(p) : p is a path from u to v}. Note: δ(u, v) = ∞ if no path from u to v exists.

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.4

Optimal substructure Theorem. A subpath of a shortest path is a shortest path.

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.5

Optimal substructure Theorem. A subpath of a shortest path is a shortest path.

Proof. Cut and paste:

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.6

Optimal substructure Theorem. A subpath of a shortest path is a shortest path.

Proof. Cut and paste:

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.7

Triangle inequality Theorem. For all u, v, x ∈ V, we have δ(u, v) ≤ δ(u, x) + δ(x, v).

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.8

Triangle inequality Theorem. For all u, v, x ∈ V, we have δ(u, v) ≤ δ(u, x) + δ(x, v).

Proof. δ(u, v)

u δ(u, x)

v δ(x, v)

x November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.9

Well-definedness of shortest paths If a graph G contains a negative-weight cycle, then some shortest paths may not exist.

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.10

Well-definedness of shortest paths If a graph G contains a negative-weight cycle, then some shortest paths may not exist. Example:

… d[u] + w(u, v) then d[v] ← d[u] + w(u, v)

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.14

Dijkstra’s algorithm d[s] ← 0 for each v ∈ V – {s} do d[v] ← ∞ S←∅ Q←V ⊳ Q is a priority queue maintaining V – S while Q ≠ ∅ do u ← EXTRACT-MIN(Q) S ← S ∪ {u} for each v ∈ Adj[u] relaxation do if d[v] > d[u] + w(u, v) step then d[v] ← d[u] + w(u, v)

Implicit DECREASE-KEY November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.15

Example of Dijkstra’s algorithm Graph with nonnegative edge weights:

10

A

1 4 3

November 14, 2005

B

C

2 8

2

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

D 7 9

E

L17.16

Example of Dijkstra’s algorithm ∞ B

Initialize: 10

0 A Q: A B C D E 0

∞

∞

∞

1 4 3

∞

C

2 8

2

∞

∞ D 7 9

E ∞

S: {} November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.17

Example of Dijkstra’s algorithm “A” ← EXTRACT-MIN(Q): 10

0 A Q: A B C D E 0

∞

∞

∞

∞

∞ B

1 4 3

C

2 8

2

∞

∞ D 7 9

E ∞

S: { A } November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.18

Example of Dijkstra’s algorithm Relax all edges leaving A: 10

0 A Q: A B C D E 0

∞ 10

∞ 3

∞ ∞

∞ ∞

10 B

1 4 3

C

2 8

2

3

∞ D 7 9

E ∞

S: { A } November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.19

Example of Dijkstra’s algorithm “C” ← EXTRACT-MIN(Q): 10

0 A Q: A B C D E 0

∞ 10

∞ 3

∞ ∞

∞ ∞

10 B

1 4 3

C

2 8

2

3

∞ D 7 9

E ∞

S: { A, C } November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.20

Example of Dijkstra’s algorithm Relax all edges leaving C: 10

0 A Q: A B C D E 0

∞ 10 7

November 14, 2005

∞ 3

∞ ∞ 11

∞ ∞ 5

7 B

1 4 3

C

2 8

2

3

11 D 7 9

E 5

S: { A, C }

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.21

Example of Dijkstra’s algorithm “E” ← EXTRACT-MIN(Q): 10

0 A Q: A B C D E 0

∞ 10 7

November 14, 2005

∞ 3

∞ ∞ 11

∞ ∞ 5

7 B

1 4 3

C

2 8

2

3

11 D 7 9

E 5

S: { A, C, E }

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.22

Example of Dijkstra’s algorithm Relax all edges leaving E: 10

0 A Q: A B C D E 0

∞ 10 7 7

November 14, 2005

∞ 3

∞ ∞ 11 11

∞ ∞ 5

7 B

1 4 3

C

2 8

2

3

11 D 7 9

E 5

S: { A, C, E }

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.23

Example of Dijkstra’s algorithm “B” ← EXTRACT-MIN(Q): 10

0 A Q: A B C D E 0

∞ 10 7 7

November 14, 2005

∞ 3

∞ ∞ 11 11

∞ ∞ 5

7 B

1 4 3

C

2 8

11 D 7 9

2

3

E 5

S: { A, C, E, B }

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.24

Example of Dijkstra’s algorithm Relax all edges leaving B: 10

0 A Q: A B C D E 0

∞ 10 7 7

November 14, 2005

∞ 3

∞ ∞ 11 11 9

∞ ∞ 5

7 B

1 4 3

C

9 D

2 8

7 9

2

3

E 5

S: { A, C, E, B }

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.25

Example of Dijkstra’s algorithm “D” ← EXTRACT-MIN(Q): 10

0 A Q: A B C D E 0

∞ 10 7 7

November 14, 2005

∞ 3

∞ ∞ 11 11 9

∞ ∞ 5

7 B

1 4 3

C

2 8

2

3

9 D 7 9

E 5

S: { A, C, E, B, D }

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.26

Correctness — Part I Lemma. Initializing d[s] ← 0 and d[v] ← ∞ for all v ∈ V – {s} establishes d[v] ≥ δ(s, v) for all v ∈ V, and this invariant is maintained over any sequence of relaxation steps.

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.27

Correctness — Part I Lemma. Initializing d[s] ← 0 and d[v] ← ∞ for all v ∈ V – {s} establishes d[v] ≥ δ(s, v) for all v ∈ V, and this invariant is maintained over any sequence of relaxation steps. Proof. Suppose not. Let v be the first vertex for which d[v] < δ(s, v), and let u be the vertex that caused d[v] to change: d[v] = d[u] + w(u, v). Then, d[v] < δ(s, v) supposition ≤ δ(s, u) + δ(u, v) triangle inequality ≤ δ(s,u) + w(u, v) sh. path ≤ specific path ≤ d[u] + w(u, v) v is first violation Contradiction. November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.28

Correctness — Part II Lemma. Let u be v’s predecessor on a shortest path from s to v. Then, if d[u] = δ(s, u) and edge (u, v) is relaxed, we have d[v] = δ(s, v) after the relaxation.

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.29

Correctness — Part II Lemma. Let u be v’s predecessor on a shortest path from s to v. Then, if d[u] = δ(s, u) and edge (u, v) is relaxed, we have d[v] = δ(s, v) after the relaxation. Proof. Observe that δ(s, v) = δ(s, u) + w(u, v). Suppose that d[v] > δ(s, v) before the relaxation. (Otherwise, we’re done.) Then, the test d[v] > d[u] + w(u, v) succeeds, because d[v] > δ(s, v) = δ(s, u) + w(u, v) = d[u] + w(u, v), and the algorithm sets d[v] = d[u] + w(u, v) = δ(s, v). November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.30

Correctness — Part III Theorem. Dijkstra’s algorithm terminates with d[v] = δ(s, v) for all v ∈ V.

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.31

Correctness — Part III Theorem. Dijkstra’s algorithm terminates with d[v] = δ(s, v) for all v ∈ V. Proof. It suffices to show that d[v] = δ(s, v) for every v ∈ V when v is added to S. Suppose u is the first vertex added to S for which d[u] > δ(s, u). Let y be the first vertex in V – S along a shortest path from s to u, and let x be its predecessor:

u S, just before adding u. November 14, 2005

s

x

y

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.32

Correctness — Part III (continued) S s

u x

y

Since u is the first vertex violating the claimed invariant, we have d[x] = δ(s, x). When x was added to S, the edge (x, y) was relaxed, which implies that d[y] = δ(s, y) ≤ δ(s, u) < d[u]. But, d[u] ≤ d[y] by our choice of u. Contradiction. November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.33

Analysis of Dijkstra while Q ≠ ∅ do u ← EXTRACT-MIN(Q) S ← S ∪ {u} for each v ∈ Adj[u] do if d[v] > d[u] + w(u, v) then d[v] ← d[u] + w(u, v)

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.34

Analysis of Dijkstra |V | times

November 14, 2005

while Q ≠ ∅ do u ← EXTRACT-MIN(Q) S ← S ∪ {u} for each v ∈ Adj[u] do if d[v] > d[u] + w(u, v) then d[v] ← d[u] + w(u, v)

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.35

Analysis of Dijkstra |V | times

while Q ≠ ∅ do u ← EXTRACT-MIN(Q) S ← S ∪ {u} for each v ∈ Adj[u] degree(u) do if d[v] > d[u] + w(u, v) times then d[v] ← d[u] + w(u, v)

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.36

Analysis of Dijkstra |V | times

while Q ≠ ∅ do u ← EXTRACT-MIN(Q) S ← S ∪ {u} for each v ∈ Adj[u] degree(u) do if d[v] > d[u] + w(u, v) times then d[v] ← d[u] + w(u, v)

Handshaking Lemma ⇒ Θ(E) implicit DECREASE-KEY’s.

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.37

Analysis of Dijkstra |V | times

while Q ≠ ∅ do u ← EXTRACT-MIN(Q) S ← S ∪ {u} for each v ∈ Adj[u] degree(u) do if d[v] > d[u] + w(u, v) times then d[v] ← d[u] + w(u, v)

Handshaking Lemma ⇒ Θ(E) implicit DECREASE-KEY’s.

Time = Θ(V·TEXTRACT-MIN + E·TDECREASE-KEY) Note: Same formula as in the analysis of Prim’s minimum spanning tree algorithm. November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.38

Analysis of Dijkstra (continued) Time = Θ(V)·TEXTRACT-MIN + Θ(E)·TDECREASE-KEY Q

TEXTRACT-MIN TDECREASE-KEY

November 14, 2005

Total

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.39

Analysis of Dijkstra (continued) Time = Θ(V)·TEXTRACT-MIN + Θ(E)·TDECREASE-KEY Q

TEXTRACT-MIN TDECREASE-KEY

array

November 14, 2005

O(V)

O(1)

Total O(V2)

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.40

Analysis of Dijkstra (continued) Time = Θ(V)·TEXTRACT-MIN + Θ(E)·TDECREASE-KEY Q

TEXTRACT-MIN TDECREASE-KEY

Total

array

O(V)

O(1)

O(V2)

binary heap

O(lg V)

O(lg V)

O(E lg V)

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.41

Analysis of Dijkstra (continued) Time = Θ(V)·TEXTRACT-MIN + Θ(E)·TDECREASE-KEY Q

TEXTRACT-MIN TDECREASE-KEY

Total

array

O(V)

O(1)

O(V2)

binary heap

O(lg V)

O(lg V)

O(E lg V)

Fibonacci O(lg V) heap amortized November 14, 2005

O(1) O(E + V lg V) amortized worst case

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.42

Unweighted graphs Suppose that w(u, v) = 1 for all (u, v) ∈ E. Can Dijkstra’s algorithm be improved?

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.43

Unweighted graphs Suppose that w(u, v) = 1 for all (u, v) ∈ E. Can Dijkstra’s algorithm be improved? • Use a simple FIFO queue instead of a priority queue.

November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.44

Unweighted graphs Suppose that w(u, v) = 1 for all (u, v) ∈ E. Can Dijkstra’s algorithm be improved? • Use a simple FIFO queue instead of a priority queue. Breadth-first search while Q ≠ ∅ do u ← DEQUEUE(Q) for each v ∈ Adj[u] do if d[v] = ∞ then d[v] ← d[u] + 1 ENQUEUE(Q, v) November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.45

Unweighted graphs Suppose that w(u, v) = 1 for all (u, v) ∈ E. Can Dijkstra’s algorithm be improved? • Use a simple FIFO queue instead of a priority queue. Breadth-first search while Q ≠ ∅ do u ← DEQUEUE(Q) for each v ∈ Adj[u] do if d[v] = ∞ then d[v] ← d[u] + 1 ENQUEUE(Q, v)

Analysis: Time = O(V + E). November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.46

Example of breadth-first search f

a

h

d b

g e

i

c Q: November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.47

Example of breadth-first search 0

f

a

h

d b

g e

i

c 0

Q: a November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.48

Example of breadth-first search 0

a

1

f

h

d 1

b

g e

i

c 1 1

Q: a b d November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.49

Example of breadth-first search 0

a

1

f

h

d 1

b

g e

2

c

i

2 1 2 2

Q: a b d c e November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.50

Example of breadth-first search 0

a

f

1

h

d 1

b

g e

2

c

i

2 2 2

Q: a b d c e November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.51

Example of breadth-first search 0

a

f

1

h

d 1

b

g e

2

c

i

2 2

Q: a b d c e November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.52

Example of breadth-first search 0

a

f

1

h

d 1

2

3

b c

g

e

i

2

3 3 3

Q: a b d c e g i November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.53

Example of breadth-first search 4 0

a

f

1

h

d 1

2

3

b c

g

e

i

2

3 3 4

Q: a b d c e g i f November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.54

Example of breadth-first search 0

a

1

4

4

f

h

d 1

2

3

b c

g

e

i

2

3 4 4

Q: a b d c e g i f h November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.55

Example of breadth-first search 0

a

1

4

4

f

h

d 1

2

3

b c

g

e

i

2

3 4

Q: a b d c e g i f h November 14, 2005

Copyright © 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson

L17.56

Example of breadth-first search 0

a

1

4

4

f

h
...