Title | Lesson 3 - Lecture notes 3 |
---|---|
Course | Torts |
Institution | St. John's University |
Pages | 1 |
File Size | 39.9 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 81 |
Total Views | 136 |
Lesson 3- Prof Ochani ...
Kimberly Lee Torts Lesson 3 September 21st 2017 I.I.E.D It protects a person right TO BE FREE from emotional distress Elements that you must prove 1. Outrageousness: Something is outrageous if it is so extreme in degree as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community. Utterly (completely) intolerable: nothing in the world that would make me tolerates this. Beyond all possible bounds of decency: This is really bad we can think of worse but we are at a really bad place. Example: two boys bringing the body in a casket for a viewing and then flinging the casket up to have the body come out right in front of the family. If the defendant has knowledge that the person suing has a peculiar sensibility more subject to serious emotional distress and they still act in this conduct it makes it a little bit easier to prove this difficult element of outrageousness. 2. Defendant’s intention of causing, OR reckless disregard of the probability of causing emotional injuries. ALL OF THE ACTIONS THAT THEY TOOK WERE TO INTEND EMOTIONAL INJURIES. Reckless disregard: they did not have much of a concern for their actions. They don’t care. “A conscious disregard” conscious: you knowingly did not care. 3. Plaintiff suffered server or extreme distress. You have to prove life changing not something that was a temporary change. Long term, life-changing distress. 4. Proximate cause Was the Yankees conduct the reason why? Or was it because she is really sensitive? Or because she has already been through 3 prior break ups. Sub rule: the conduct you are rely on can not be a mire threat, mire annoyance, mire insult...