Management Consulting Lecture Notes PDF

Title Management Consulting Lecture Notes
Course Investment Analysis
Institution University of Technology Sydney
Pages 14
File Size 1.3 MB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 418
Total Views 543

Summary

Management Consulting Lecture NotesLecture 1: Understanding Management Consulting as complex problem solvingOverview - What is management consulting - Our approach to problem solving - Thinking as a management consultant: some brain teasers - Introducing UTS ShopfrontWhat do management consultants d...


Description

Management Consulting Lecture Notes Lecture 1: Understanding Management Consulting as complex problem solving

Overview - What is management consulting - Our approach to problem solving - Thinking as a management consultant: some brain teasers - Introducing UTS Shopfront What do management consultants do? - Definition:  From Latin consultare to ask advice or to deliberate  Implies providing strategic advice based on analysis and evidence - “The creation of value for organisations, through the application of knowledge, techniques and assets, to improve business performance. This is achieved through the rendering of objective advice and/or the implementation of business solution”

Solving Problems: the 4s Method - Why- To Avoid Typical Problem-Solving Pitfalls:  Flawed problem definition  Solution confirmation  Wrong framework  Narrow framing  Miscommunication 4s stages - State the problem - Structure the problem - Solve the problem - Sell the problem o However, not all management problems are the same; they require different approaches

4S and different problems

Can you think as a consultant?

] Lecture 2- Managing Clients and preparing a proposal Key topics

-

Selling consulting Stating the problem: TOSCA framework Preparing a consulting proposal

What are the characteristics of consulting services? Characteristics of the consulting service 1. Ambiguous Quality  Heterogeneous  Evaluation  Non-standard Issues 2. Immaterial Project  Perishable  Management  Situational Issues 3. Interactive Relation  Coproduced  Management/Political  Relational Issues Quality evaluation issues - It is difficult to isolate the impact of consulting advice on performance - Consulting intervention itself destroys any base case for comparison - Evaluation is largely subjective - Presence of vested interests (e.g. internal sponsors) - Consulting involves an ongoing negotiation of needs, trust and value Multiple contributions of consultants

Challenges for Consulting Services Service Features Knowledge-based

Need Manage knowledge

Intangible/Fuzzy

Signal competence

Co-produced

Learn from clients

Managerial Challenges Continuous learning & knowledge capture Impression and reputation management Client-consultant relationship

Measuring success in a high-relation setting - The question to be asked is not just: was the advice technically sound and well receive by the client? BUT ALSO: - Has our consulting activity produced a positive change in what the client organisation does?

Stating the problem: TOSCA framework

Trouble - What makes the problem (or opportunity) real and present? - Trouble= gap between observation and aspiration Owner - Who is asking for this problem to be solved and who will judge both problem and definition and the solution? - Identify who is the project sponsor - Who are the key decision makers? Success Criteria - What will success look like: ask client to picture ideal future - If possible, translate ‘ideal future’ in quantifiable targets - Make sure it is realistic and be ready to review it - Ignore possible solutions: focus on identifying the problem Constraints - Consider constraints (and trade-offs) affecting success criteria - Prior commitments? - Conflicting objectives? - Resource limitations? - Access limitations?

Actors -

Who are the stakeholders Who have a say on the issue? How influential are they? Who do they want?

Preparing your proposal (assignment 1)

Proposal Template: Title - Short but descriptive - Helps support and define the task Executive summary - 200-300 words max: describe the entire content of the report Client background and requirements - Identify key issues (using TOSCA) Objectives/Scope - SMART objectives - Separately identify in scope/out of scope (MoSCoW)

Proposal Structure

SMART Objectives - Specific  What/How/Why/Who/When - Measurable  Quantifiable (specify metrics) - Achievable  Doable, considering constraints and capabilities - Realistic/Relevant  Linked to strategic business goal - Time-bound  Clear deadlines Objectives—more specific and measurable than goals/aims. Eg objective; to be N1 in xxx market—quantifiable statement about a desired strategic goal. “ cant you just…”—clients always try to push the boundaries—get the clients to commit to your piece of work. A brief description of what you think you need to do—talk to the board; do research etc. Objectives—clarify the individual roles in delivering the objectives. Outcomes—really important—what the business should be able to do as a result of the consulting advice you give—what are you leaving behind you? What are the deliverables and timeframe—report, presentation, documentation, draft survey or interview questionnaire, process for getting funding etc.

MoSCoW scope - Must

-

 Requirement that must be satisfied in the final solution Should  High-priority item that should be included in the solution if it is possible Could  Requirement which is considered desirable but not Won’t (wouldn’t)  Requirement that stakeholders have agreed will not be implemented in a given release, but may be considered for the future

Lecture 3: Structing the problem, deductive and inductive approaches TOSCA

Narrow down the problem

4s Stages: - State - Structure - Solve - Sell Different types of problem solving

Applying deductive approaches: Building a Hypothesis Pyramid

Deductive Reasoning

Building a hypothesis pyramid

MECE - Mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive - Method of representing complex information in an easy way

MECE Example: ways to increase sales

Hypothesis hierarchy

Example

Applying inducitive approaches: Growing an Issue Tree Indiuctive reasoning

What is the Issue Tree?

What is the Issue Tree: 80/20 rule (Pareto principle) - 80% of the problems come from 20% of the causes - Separates the “vital few” from the “useful many” - Isolates the key issues and tasks that will most likely have the greatest impact when answering a question. How to build an issue tree: example

Issue 1- Increasing costs - From the client’s responses the consultant may formulate 3 possible hypotheses about explanatory factors

-

The 3 preliminary hypothesis are thought provoking & can help the consultant with initial conversation as he/she works towards understanding the situation But what is missing from this preliminary analysis?

What is missing? - Losses can result not only from the ‘cost side’ but also from the revenue side of the equation  Profits = Revenues – Costs - The short conversation with the client did not address the whole field of enquiry - It is up to the consultant to ‘enrich’ the conversation…  What might that (2nd issue) be? Issue 2- Declining revenues? - Probing questions: 1. Are your company sales growing as fast as the industry? 2. Has your company boosted its advertising spending as fast as industry rivals?  New set of hypothesis

An Issue Tree...


Similar Free PDFs