Title | Mind Map - Land Law 2 - Indefeasibility |
---|---|
Author | Hairul Anuar |
Course | Land Law II |
Institution | Universiti Teknologi MARA |
Pages | 2 |
File Size | 185 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 1 |
Total Views | 21 |
Transferor (true owner)Indefeasiblity (1/2) Paper Size : ADEFINITIONMuthammah a/p Govindan v Ma sri Bin M ohamed & Anor [2000]a title / an interest which is free of indefeasible title all advers e claims / encumbrances not noted in the registerthe effect of reg is tration defeat all prior un...
the effect of registration
Bonaa Fid Fide haserr Bon e PPu urchase S.5 NLC - Purchaser (BFP) Land was transferred to the subsequently it was charge to the bank transferee by way of fraud Owe Then Kooi v Au Thiam Seng [1990] the interest obtained by the chargee was indefeasible
he is a bona fide purchaser for value without notice cannot merely be consideration for natural love & affection
the Resp. s husband fraudulently transferred the property of his deceased father to the respondent , his wife-without any consideration,
(1) Pays valuable consideration
Chu Choon Moi v Ngan Siew Tin [1986]
the Resp. s husband fraudulently transferred the property of his deceased father to the respondent , his wife-without any consideration
upon registration - the title/interest shall be indefeasible-immune from attack by adverse claim
S.340(2)
The title / interest shall be defeasible where it was obtained through
HELD
Mohamed Moidu Mohamed v Hasan Kadir [2001]
DEF. knew at the time he bought the said land the purchase price was below the market valuebut he wanted to take advantage of the low price
the sale was concluded without any proper investigation into the title & the person claiming to be owners of the property
S.340(3) NLC was inapplicable
DEF not a BFP even though valuable consideration was given
the act of registration cures the defect in the instrument Indefeasiblity (1/2) Paper Size : A3
affirmed decision in Au Meng Nam Mohammad Buyong v Pemungut Hasil Tanah Gombak & Ors [1982]
any imperfections to the title/interest other than fraud will be waived
parties to immediate indefeasibility are: pay consideration value obtains immediate indefeasibility of title /interest when Transferor (true owner)
Liew Yok Yin v AGS Harta Sdn Bhd (2006)
HELD
deferred indefeasibility 1965-2001
Forger
acts in good faith Bona Fide Purchaser For Value Consideration (BFP4V)
Immediate Transferee
(2 (2)) De Defe fe ferrred Ind Inde ef e asibi asibilililitt y happen when the indefeasible title is deferred to the innocent person
dealing with the person who has been registered as owner
if registration was obtained through fraud/ forgery /any other S.34 40 (2 (2) NLC reason under S.3
the title or interest will be defeasible under S.3 S.34 40 (3) NLC & cannot be transferred by the proprietor to anyone else
due to fraud /forgery/ S.34 40 (2) NLC misrepresentation etc.- S.3
unless the transferee (subsequent purchaser- SP) is a BFPV
SP - person who has no knowledge that the title is defeasible & purchases the land with valuable consideration
then, the title will become indefeasible only once it is transferred to a BFP4V
if the title/interest , though obtained through fraud/forgery/ etc has not been being challenged
the person whose name is registered on the RDT is treated as having an indefeasible title/interest which he can pass to others
parties to deferred indefeasibility are: immediate indefeasibility
deferred indefeasibility
2001-2010 June 2010
S.340(3) NLC only applies to SP the bank in this case was an immediate holder of the charges & not a subsequent holder the title to the property must be reverted back to the APP.
only when the title/interest is obtained through fraud - open to challenge
despite the fact that a void/ voidable instrument has been used to obtain registration
P os it i on in Malaysia
M&J Frozen Food Sdn Bhd & Anor v Siland Sdn Bhd [1994 ]
Adorna Properties Sdn Bhd v Boonson Boonyanit @ Sun Yok Eng[2001]
he is immediately guaranteed that his title / interest is free from any adverse claims
HELD
Tiagaraja Palaniandy v Moganadas Maniam & Anor (2011)
the shareholder (DEF2) are aware that PL . never transferred his half share in the land to DEF1
Subsection (b) – refers to any interest created over the land
(1 (1)) Im Imme me med d iat iate e Indefe Indefeasib asib asibililility ity
(b) proper investigation to be done before conclusion of a sale
the sale was completed 5 months & no any valuation done either
(b) any interest may be set aside in the hands of any person in whom it is vested
when a person s name is registered as the owner/interest holder on the RDT
a purchaser in good faith does not include a purchaser who is careless / who had been negligent
the title of the acquirer is liable to be set aside in the hands of the acquirer & all those whom he transfers the land except a bona fide purchaser for valuable consideration
defeasible title does not only rest with the owner but also to anyone dealing with the land and taking registered interest on it. Eg- lessee or chargee
(2) acts in good faith
Au Meng Nam & Anor v Ung Yak Chew & Ors [2007 ]
the existence of a sale & purchase agreement (SPA) & payment of the purchase price in full cannot be the only indicator to show whether a person is a BFP4V
Subramaniam v Sandrakasan [2005]
Types of Indefeasibility
(a) adequate in keeping with the property s value disregarded his obligations to investigate the alleged proprietors & the genuineness of the documents
(b) forgery / an insufficient / void instrument (c) unlawfully acquired by a person in exercise of his power of authority
IMPLIES THAT no successor to a defeasible proprietor can obtain an indefeasible title
where the title / interest is defeasible for any one of the reasons
if no valuable consideration (not BFP)
the purchaser must not have any knowledge – be it actual /constructive
(a) fraud / misrepresentation
(a) the title may be set aside to whomever it may subsequently be transferred S.340(3)
the Resp. could not be termed a BFP in good faith & for valuable consideration one who takes title/an interest to land without giving value /consideration treated as a volunteer
the title or interest is bad in law
S.340(1)
Criteria NLC 1965
because under certain circumstances – a registered title or interest may be set aside / defeated by a person who has a better claim
general principle in the concept of indefeasibility NOT ABSOLUTE
Muthammah a/p Govindan v Masri Bin Mohamed & Anor [2000]
Burden is on the transferee to prove that
Consideration made must be valuable (payment of money)
HELD: they could not be termed as BFPV – no consideration arose from the transfer
indefeasible title
DEFINITION
HELD
The meaning of purchaser also includes chargee/other interest holder
defeat all prior unregistered claims a title / an interest which is free of all adverse claims / encumbrances not noted in the register
regardless of whether the bank was a BFP4V
Tan Ying Hong v Tan Sian San & Ors [2010]
Transferor (true owner)
in some cases , the forger & IT can be the same person
Forger
Immediate Transferee - IT
The IT gets a defeasible title, despite the fact that the land was transferred to him in good faith & for value
Subsequent Purchaser -SP
SP , provided that he purchases in good faith & for value – get an indefeasible title - he obtains statutory protection under the proviso to S.340(3) NLC
The deferred indefeasibility helps draw a line between the true owner & SP...