Title | New York Longitudinal Study |
---|---|
Author | James Hurwitz |
Course | Cognitive Psychology |
Institution | Elon University |
Pages | 4 |
File Size | 119.9 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 93 |
Total Views | 168 |
New York Longitudinal Study...
11/27: Emotions cont. Individual Differences
Temperament: constitutionally based individual differences in emotional, motor, ad attentional reactivity and self-regulation o
Biological basis? Consistent across contexts? Stable over time?
New York Longitudinal Study
o
Repeatedly interviewed parents in depth about infants’ specific behaviors
o
Identified 9 aspects of infant temperament
Activity level, rhythmicity, approach/withdrawal, adaptability, intensity of reaction threshold of responsiveness, quality of mood, distractibility, attention span
Findings: lots of similarities, but lots of differences
Easy babies (40%): easy-going, not overly reactive, predictable, stable
Difficult (10%): upset easily, hard to soothe, less controlled
Slow-to-warm-up (15%): first difficult, then easy, takes time to adjust
Remaining 35% didn’t fit definitely into these categories
Stability of temperament over time: yes to a degree
Higher “fearful distress” in infancy = more fear in novel situations in 2 year olds = more social inhibition at 4.5 years
Tendency for negative emotion at age 3 = more negativity at ages 6 and 8
Greater ability to focus attention in preschool = greater ability to focus attention at ages 11 and 12
Temperament-predicting personality:
Temperament and social adjustment
Central to development of social skills
Being able to act positively towards others makes you nicer to be around
A Longitudinal Study: New Zealand o
Children who were negative, impulsive, unregulated had more adjustment problems
Not getting along well with others
More likely to engage in illegal behaviors, get in trouble with law
At 21: less happy relationships, more unemployment, fewer sources of social support
“Goodness of Fit”
Adjustment depend son how one’s temperament fits into their particular environment
Parents’ socialization practices can affect child’s temperament and vice versa
Ex. baby who receives subjective pain which causes irritability which spreads to parent and causes vicious cycle, opposite also true
“Squeaky Wheel” in interaction with environment
Sometimes a “negative” temperament can be a good thing
In places where there aren’t enough resources to go around could be beneficial in terms of teaching appreciation and empathy for things, ex. Rich kid or only child syndrome...