Note 10 - note PDF

Title Note 10 - note
Author Kiet Le
Course Env Phil
Institution University of Georgia
Pages 7
File Size 55.9 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 92
Total Views 131

Summary

note...


Description

According to the rationalist, logical truths, mathematical truths, and metaphysical truths are all examples of which kind of knowledge; - - a priori knowledge

According to your text, "idealism" means the belief that; - - ultimate reality is mental or spiritual in nature

According to your text, the term "epistemology" comes from two Greek words that mean; -Knowledge and rational discourse

Berkeley believed that the word "matter" refers to - - nothing at all

Descartes finally concluded that he could trust his sense experience because; - - a good God would not deceive him

Descartes's argument for God's existence is based on; - - the very idea of a perfect being

Descartes's first bedrock of certainty was; - - "I am, I exist"

Descartes's principle "there must be as much reality in the cause as there is in the effect" was used to prove the existence of; - - God

Expressing two assertions that could not both be true under any possible circumstances is known as; - a logical inconsistency. - a self-referential inconsistency. - the false dichotomy fallacy. - the fallacy of affirming the consequent. - - a logical inconsistency.

Hume says our casual judgments are based on; - - the constant conjuction of two events in our past experience

Hume was skeptical about which of the following beliefs?; - - our belief that the future will always be like the past

Hume's test for evaluating the worth of a book was to ask: Does it contain either - - mathematical reasoning or experimental reasoning about matters of fact?

if an argument begins with the assuming the truth of a position and then showing that the position's truth leads to a logically absurd or self-contradictory conclusion, the argument is known as; - a deductive syllogism - a hypothetical syllogism - a disjunctive syllogism - a reductio ad absurdem - - a reductio ad absurdem

if the expression " if p THEN q" is true and you know p is true then you know; - q has to be false - q has to be true - q can either be true or false - none of the above - - q has to be true

if the expression "p and q" is true then you know; - p has to be true - p has to be false - q can be either true or false - q cannot be true - - p has to be true

if you know P is false in the expression, "if p then q" then you know; - q has to be false - q has to be true - q can either be true or false

- none of the above - - q can be either true of false

in an inductive argument, if the premises of the argument are not based on a sufficient number of observations the conclusion may be a; - hypothetical syllogism - hasty generalization -disjunctive syllogism -false cause fallacy - - hasty generalization

In discussing "inference to the best explanation," the text pointed out that; - philosophy makes use of this method, but science does not. - science makes use of this method, but philosophy does not. - both science and philosophy make use of this method. - religion makes use of this method, but science and philosophy do not. - - both science and philosophy make use of this method.

In his inital examination of his beliefs, the one thing that Descartes could not doubt was that; - He was doubting

In his trial, Socrates referred to himself as; - a rudder that keeps the people of Athens on course. - a gadfly that continually harasses people to wake them from their apathy. - a compass that shows people the direction they should take. - a coach that trains people on how to use their intellectual muscles - - a gadfly that continually harasses people to wake them from their apathy.

In Kant's Terminology, things-as-they-appear-to-us are called ________ and things-in themselves are called __________. - - the phenomena/ the noumena

in Plato's Allegory of the Cave, the shadows represented; - our doubts and lack of confidence in our own worth.

- the fact that truth is elusive and cannot be found. - the gods. - imperfect and confused representations of a higher reality. - - imperfect and confused representations of a higher reality.

In your reading from Plato's dialogue Phaedo, Socrates discusses - - How we can have knowledge of perfect justice, beauty, goodness, and equality

Innate ideas are ideas that; - - the mind already contains prior to experience

Kant's categories of understanding are; - - organizing principles the mind brings to experience

One of the three epistemological questions discussed in the text is; - - Does our knowledge represent reality as it realy is?

Philosophers, following Plato, have traditionally definted knowledge as; - - true justified belief

Since fire has burned us in the past, we believe that fire will burn us in the future. According to Hume, this reasoning is based on - - the principle of induction

Socrates believed he was wiser than anyone else in Athens because he; -knew he was ignorant -had found the ultimate truth, using the Socratic method. -realized that all opinions are equally true. -did not believe in any god. - - knew he was ignorant

socrates maintained that good person cannot be harmed by others because; - the gods will protect the good person. - other will respect and honor a person who is truly good. - society will come to the defense of someone who is good.

- evil people can harm the body but not a person's true self. - - evil people can harm the body but not a person's true self.

Socrates referred to himself as - a mirror that reflects the truth in nature -the housekeeper of the mind -the midwife of ideas. - an artist that creates pictures with ideas - the midwife of ideas.

Socrates undermines Thrasymachus's definition of justice by; - showing that it leads to a contradiction. - arguing that most people would be unlikely to accept it. - demonstrating that it would violate the laws of Athens. - arguing that adopting it would lead to social instability. - - showing that it leads to a contradiction.

The adjective "empirical" refers to; - - anything that is based on experience

The claim "Either my team will win their next game or they won't" is an example of; - - a logical necessary truth and a priori knowledge

the empiricist believes that; - - all of the above

The empiricist believes that; - - all of the above

The primary reason that Descartes doubted so many things was; - - to find if there was any belief that was certain

The Socratic method consisted of; - drawing philosophical conclusions from scientific observations.

- lecturing to people on the basic principles for successful living. - surveying public opinion and embracing the collective wisdom of the majority. - asking questions of people and then questioning their answers. - - asking questions of people and then questioning their answers.

The term "philosophy" literally means -the search for knowledge. -deep questions. -the love of wisdom. -the search for meaning. - the love of wisdom

The text referred to Kant's position as "constructivism" because; - -he claimed that the mind forms its objects out of the raw data of experience

The text referred to Rene Descartes's strategy for finding certainty as; - - methodological skepticism

Three of the empiricists discussed in the text were; - - John Locke, George Berkeley, and David Hume

Which of the following claims did Immanuel Kant assert?; - - all of the above

Which of the following is a characteristic of a valid argument?; - All the premises must be true. - The conclusion must be true. - If the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. - all of the above - - If the premises are true, the conclusion must be true.

Which of the following was one of the three anchor points of rationalism - - The fundamental truths about the world can be known a priori

you are given, " if p, then q" you are also given q... therefore you know that; - p is true - both p and q are true - p is not true - none of the above - - none of the above....


Similar Free PDFs