Quaid vs Nehru PDF

Preview

Summary

It’s all about the stance of Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Jawaharlal Nehru...

Description

Quaid’s Fourteen Points Vs Nehru Report Nehru Report: After the disappointment of Simon Commission, there was no option for the English government except for to request that the neighbourhood individuals outline a constitution for themselves. They realised that the Congress and Muslim Alliance were the two primary gatherings and that the two of them had genuine distinction of assessments. In this way, they solicited them to draw a draft from the up and coming Follow up on which the two Hindus and Muslims could concur. for this reason, All Gatherings Meeting was held at Delhi in January 1928. In excess of a hundred gatherings of the Sub-landmass collected and took an interest in the meeting. Sadly, the pioneers couldn't reach any resolution. The second gathering of the All Gatherings Meeting was held in Spring the very year, yet the outcome was same. At the point when the All Gatherings Meeting met for the third time in Bombay on May 19 1928, there was not really any possibility of a concurred constitution. It was then concluded that a little advisory group ought to be named to work out the subtleties of the constitution. Motilal Nehru headed this panel. There were nine different individuals in this board of trustees including two Muslims, Syed Ali Imam and Shoaib Qureshi. The board of trustees laboured for a quarter of a year at Allahabad and its reminder was known as the "Nehru Report". The suggestions of the Nehru Report conflicted with the interests of the Muslim people group. It was an endeavour to serve Hindus over Muslims.

Quaid’s Fourteen Points: A positive part of Nehru Report was that it brought about the solidarity of partitioned Muslims gatherings. A positive part of Nehru Report was that it brought about the solidarity of separated Muslim gatherings. In a gathering of the committee of All India Muslim Alliance on Walk 28, 1929, individuals from both the Shafi Class and Jinnah Association partook. Quaid-e-Azam named the Nehru Report as a Hindu record, however considered basically dismissing the report as deficient. He chose to give

an elective Muslim plan. It was in this gathering that Quaid-e-Azam introduced his popular Fourteen Focuses. The gathering of the All India Muslim Class acknowledged fourteen purposes of the Quaid. A goal was passed by which no plan for the future constitution of the Legislature of India would be satisfactory to the Muslims except if and until it incorporated the requests of the Quaid introduced in the fourteen focuses.

Comparison:  The Nehru Board of trustees' most prominent blow was the dismissal of independent electorates yet Quaid-e-Azam was in the kindness of discrete Muslims electorate.  In 14 purposes of Muhammad Ali Jinnah weightage for Minorities was requested yet Nehru in his report didn't bargain with our Quaid.  Nehru report request Solid Focal Government. On the opposite end Quaid-e-Azam was accept on the Common Self-governance.  Jinnah was in the courtesy of Considerations of Muslims in the bureau however Nehru was against the incorporation of Muslims in the bureau.  Quaid-e-Azam requested 1/third Portrayal in focal government for Muslims however Nehru remark 1/fourth portrayal for Muslim in focal government in his report.  The facts demonstrate that request of division of Sindh from Bombay was considered in the Nehru Report as Jinnah notice in his 14 focuses yet the state of self-economy was additionally advanced.

2

The Nehru Report was nothing else than a Congress document and thus totally opposed by Muslims of the Sub-continent. The Hindus under Congress threatened the government with a disobedience movement if the Nehru report was not implemented into the Act by December 31, 1929. This Hindu attitude proved to be a milestone in the freedom movement of the Muslims. It also proved to be a turning point in the life of Muhammad Ali Jinnah. After reading the Nehru Report, Jinnah announced a ‘parting of the ways’. The Nehru Report reflected the inner prejudice and narrow-minded approach of the Hindus.

3...