Title | Sm-ch-8 |
---|---|
Author | ali pn |
Course | engineering thermodynamics |
Institution | دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر |
Pages | 147 |
File Size | 3.5 MB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 82 |
Total Views | 141 |
Download Sm-ch-8 PDF
Chapter 8 Solutions Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics 2e
Milo Koretsky Wyatt Tenhaeff School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering Oregon State University [email protected]
8.1 No this will not work. A central idea behind binary phase equilibrium is that when both species are volatile, there will be a mixture of 1 and 2 in both the vapor and the liquid. There will be a higher mole fraction of the lighter component, toluene, in the liquid relative to the mole in the vapor, but there will also be cyclohexane present.
2
8.2 Yes if species b is the lighter component, the phase diagram for the system looks approximately like the one below. We can see that both xa and ya are smaller at the higher pressure, P2:
Pbsat
P2
xa
P1
Pasat
ya
xa y a
3
8.3 The addition of the second species to the liquid will lower the liquid mole fraction of water. Thus, the fugacity of water in the liquid will be lower than its fugacity in the vapor. Since T and P are constant, the fugacity of the steam remains constant. Since the fugacity of water in liquid is lower than vapor, it will all condense.
4
8.4 The addition of the second species to the liquid will lower the liquid mole fraction of water. Thus, the fugacity of water in the liquid will be lower than its fugacity in the vapor and the steam will condense. However, since the container is rigid, the pressure of the vapor will decrease as the steam condenses, lowering its fugacity. Therefore, some of the steam will condense until the pressure in the vapor is low enough that the fugacity in the vapor matches the fugacity in the liquid.
5
8.5 When the third component is added to the liquid, the mole fraction of the water in the liquid decreases so tis fugacity decreases. Thus, the fugacity of water in the vapor will be greater than in the liquid and some water will condense, lowering the number of moles in the vapor.
6
8.6 (a) since i 0. This indicates that like interactions are stronger than unlike interactions. (b)
P xa a Pasat xb b Pbsat RT ln a A 3B x2b 4Bx3b 3174.4 J/mol RT ln b A 3B xa2 4Bxa3 334.4 J/mol
a 3.60 b 1.14 From the Antoine equation: 3166.38 Pasat exp 10.9237 0.0270 bar 298.15 80.15
3816.44 Pbsat exp 11.6834 0.0312 bar 298.15 46.13
Solving for pressure: P 0.048 bar
(c) Solving for mole fraction x P sat ya a a a 0.41 P
35
8.30
Determine the temperature and the vapor phase of mole fraction a: 2.74 7600 J mol
0.6
74.5kPa
exp
Low P ideal gas
P P
P P
P P P exp
A A P exp P
74.5kPa 0.6exp2.740.4 0.4exp2.740.6 → steamtables → Antoineequation ln P 9.2806
Guess and check:
2788.51 52.36
TC
P kPa P kPa
P(kPa)
50C
12.35
36
50.3
70C
31.19
73
108
*60C
19.94
52
74.5
P 0.25
36
8.31 (a) Given:
x1 0.471 x2 1 x1 0.529 P 0.073 bar From the Antoine Equation at 20 oC: sat
0.10 bar
sat 2
0.29 bar
P1 P
Setting fugacities equal: y1 P x1 1 P1sat y2 P x2 2 P2
sat
P x1 1P1sat x 2 2 P2sat
Applying the two-suffix Margules Equation
A 2 x2 RT A 2 2 exp x1 RT
1 exp
So
A 2 sat exp A 2 sat P x1 exp x 2 P1 x2 RT x1 P2 RT Solving for A: J A 1220 mol
(b) We can examine the Margules parameter A and we find that A > 0. This indicates that like interactions are stronger than unlike interactions.
37
(c)
1 2 exp
A 1.68 RT
[ 1 1 P1sat 0.172 bar [ 2 2 P2sat 0.048 bar (d)
x P y1 1 1 1 P
sat
0.77
(e) Lever rule nl y z 0.77 0.7 1 1 0.23 T n y1 x1 0.77 0.471
nl 2.3 mol
38
8.32 To calculate the pressure, we can use the following:
To calculate the mole fraction of vapor we use:
Start by calculating & , using the three-suffix Margules model
RT ln a A 3 B xb2 4 Bxb3
RT ln b A 3B xa2 4 Bxa3
Next we need to use the Antoine equation to calculate Psat for each of the species in our solution.
3166.38 Pasat exp 10.9237 0.0270 bar 298.15 80.15 3816.44 Pbsat exp 11.6834 0.0312 bar 298.15 46.13
This can be determined by plotting xa and ya vs P 0.06
0.05
Pressure[bar]
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00 0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
xa,ya
Where xa is the blue line and ya is the red line. We can see that it does form an azeotrope. Next we can determine the pressure at which that azeotrope occurs via solver or other analysis. P = 0.0477 bar
39
8.33 At the azeotrope
x1 y1
x2 y2
Therefore, the expressions equating liquid and vapor fugacities simplify to
P 1P1sat
P 2 P2sat
(Note: We are also assuming that the vapor behaves ideally, which is reasonable since the pressure is 122.3 torr.) We can calculate the saturation pressures at 25 ºC using Antoine’s equation data in Appendix A.
3803.98 0.078 bar 58.5 torr P1sat exp12.2917 298.15 41.68 2788.51 0.127 bar 95.2 torr P2sat exp 9.2806 298.15 52.36 For the van Laar equation
A Bx 2 1 exp RT Ax1 Bx2
2
B 2 exp RT
Ax1 Ax1 Bx 2
2
Substitute these expressions into the above equations for pressure. We have
P ln P sat 1
2 Bx 2 A RT Ax 1 Bx 2
P ln P sat 2
Ax1 B RT Ax1 Bx2
Inserting numerical values, we have two equations for two unknowns: B 0.72 122.3 A ln 58.5 8.314 298.15 A 0.28 B 0.72
2
A 0.28 122.3 B ln 95.2 8.314 298.15 A 0.28 B 0.72
2
Solve the equations simultaneously:
40
2
J A 6416.0 mol J B 2856.6 mol Now, to calculate the pressure and liquid composition when the vapor mole fraction of ethanol is 0.75, we can use the following equations
y1P x1 1P1sat
y 2 P x 2 2 P2sat
Therefore,
x1 1P1sat y1 P y1 y2 P y 2 x2 2 P sat 2 y1 P2sat y2 P1sat
x 1 1 x2 2
Substitute the activity coefficient expressions for the van Laar equation:
y1P2sat y2 P1sat
2 2 A Bx A B 1 x1 2 x1 exp x1 exp RT Ax1 B1 x1 RT Ax1 Bx2 2 2 B Ax1 Ax1 B x2 exp 1 x1 exp RT Ax1 B 1 x1 RT Ax1 Bx2
Insert numerical values and solve for x1 :
x1 0.935 x 2 0.065 Now, we can calculate the pressure
P
x11 P1sat y1
2 2856.6 0.065 6416 0.935 58.5 torr exp 8.314 298.15 6416 0.935 2856.6 0.065 0.75
P 73.1 torr
41
8.34 (a) The molar volume can be found by manipulating the expression given in the problem statement:
RT P Ay 1y 2 B P 8.314 298.15 90 10 5 8.314 298.15 2 10 14 1 / 3 2 / 3 8 1015 v 90 105 3 4 m v 3.55 10 mol
v
We calculate the total volume as follows
V n T v 15 mol 3.55 104 m3 / mol 5.33103 m3 The molar volume of species 2 is calculated by letting y 2 1 .
v2
8.314 298.15 90 10
5
90 10 8.314 298.152 10 01 8 10 14
5
15
m3 v2 4.54 10 4 mol The partial molar volume of species 2 is calculated by evaluating the appropriate derivative:
nn V n1 n 2 RT V2 P A 1 2 Bn1 n2 P n1 n2 n 2 T , P , n1 n 2 RT V2 P Ay12 B P 3 4 m V2 4 .04 10 mol (b) To find the pure species fugacity coefficient, first find an expression for the pure species fugacity:
f 2v v dP RT ln 2 Plow Plow P
42
f2v RT PB dP RT ln Plow Plow P P
P B 2 f2v 2 RT ln RT ln P P low Plow Plow 2 If we let Plow go to zero, cancel the remaining Plow’s, and simplify, we obtain
B 2 P f 2v P exp 2RT B 2 P 1.38 v2 exp 2RT To find the fugacity coefficient of species 2 in the mixture, we use the following procedure: fˆ v V2 dP RT ln y 2 P2low Plow P fˆv RT 2 B dP RT ln P Ay 2 P 1 y2 Plow Plow P
fˆ v P 1 2 2 2 P B RT ln 2 RT ln P low Ay1 Plow 2 y 2 Plow If we let Plow go to zero, cancel the remaining Plow’s, and simplify, we obtain
P2 fˆ2v y2 P exp Ay12 B 2RT 2 P ˆv2 exp Ay12 B 1.26 2RT (c) Plot the activity coefficient of species 2 versus its liquid mole fraction:
43
Henry's
Plot of Activity Coefficient 2 1.2
2
Henry's
1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
x2
The activity coefficient based on Henry’s Law is less than one. Thus, the fugacity is less than the fugacity based solely on 1-2 interactions. Consequently, the like interactions must be stronger. (d) For phase equilibrium of species 2 to exist, the following must be true:
y2 ˆ2v P x2 2Henry 's[ 2 However, we can’t calculate the activity coefficient until we know the liquid mole fraction. Therefore, we need to make an expression for the activity coefficient containing the mole fraction: x2
y2ˆ2v P y2 ˆ2v P 's Henry H2 exp 7 1 1 x2 2 H 2 2
We can find the mole fraction with a solver function:
x2 0.013 (e) Initially assume the fugacity coefficient is one at the saturation pressure and the Poynting correction is negligible. Use the following equation: Henry 's 2
P2sat [2
P2sat 7000 bar exp 7 1 0 2 6.38 bar
44
The fugacity coefficient at saturation can be found according the the result of part (b):
B 2 P 1.00 2RT
2sat exp
so the assumption is valid.
45
8.35 At the azeotrope
xa y a
xb y b
Therefore, the expressions equating liquid and vapor fugacities simplify to
P a Pasat P b Pbsat (Note: We are also assuming that the vapor behaves ideally.) Since the liquid-phase nonideality is represented by the two-suffix Margules equation, the following expressions are used to calculate the activity coefficients:
A 2 A 2 xb exp 1 x a RT RT A 2 b exp xa RT
a exp
Substitute these expressions into the pressure equations and equate the pressures. Solve for xa:
A 2 A 2 x Pasat exp 1 xa Pbsat exp RT a RT 2900 2900 2 2 xa 68.8 kPa exp 1 xa 46.5 kPa exp 8.314 328.15 8.314 328.15
xa 0.68 Now, calculate the activity coefficient of methanol.
2900 0.32 2 1.11 8.314 328.15
a exp
Use this value to calculate the pressure.
P 1.11 68.8 kPa 76.4 kPa
46
Thus, an azeotrope forms at a pressure of 76.4 kPa and a temperature of 55 ºC. The composition is 68% methanol and 32% ethyl acetate. This is a minimum-boiling azeotrope (positive deviations from Raoult’s Law) because the azeotropic pressure is greater than the two saturation pressures.
47
8.36
RTln 8.31470 273.15ln99.7 13,130 J mol
4.60 RT
RTln 1
1 → exp
1 1 RT
0.011, 0.75, 1
The value 0.75 makes physical sense.
48
8.37
System Properties:
Toluene Data:
P 20.57bar T 301o C 574.15 o K
Antoine A 9.3935 B 3096.52
TC 591.7 o K PC 41.14bar
C 53.67
0.257
fˆ1v f1v 1 P
1 general correlation
PR
P 0.5 PC
TR
574.15 0.77 591.7
From Appendix C log ( o) 0.086 and log (1) 0.023
log 1 log ( o) log (1) 0.092
1 0.810 Vapor is pure, liquid is a binary mixture
f1 1P f1v fˆ1l x1 11sat P1sat x1 1
v
f1 16.6 1sat P1sat 1sat 31.3
To find 1s at we need to linearly interpolate PRsat
574.15 31.3 0.77 0.761 , TR 591.7 41.14 0.7
0.8
0.76
-0.126
-0.148
-0.139
log (1) -0.034
-0.042
-0.039
PR
log
( o)
sat log1 0.149
49
1sat 0.709 x1 1 0.75 From the graph, and more linear interpolation
x1
1
x11
0.7 0.75
1.06 1.04
0.742 0.78
x1 0.71
50
ln ln → 2suffixMargules → ln 0.75
8.38
0.4
J RT ln 1953 mol
low, ,
80kPa 60kPa
(a)
80.3kPa
exp 1 1 exp RT RT
0.45
10mol
4mol 10 4
10 4 3.90mol (b) At azeotrope.
, , → 1
8 exp 1 6 RT RT ln1.33 1 2 0.38 1 2
2
1 0.38 0.69 2
51
exp RT 1 85.9kPa
(c) Since A>0, the like interactions are stronger
52
8.39 (a) If this mixture is in equilibrium with vapor under these conditions, what is the vapor phase mole fraction of a? 1mol
3mol
Table 7.1
4mol
RTln A
P 0.50bar 50kPa
ln 0.687
T 25
0.25
1703
1.99
0.75
A 4010 Jmol
P 0.251.9975kPa 0.745 50 P
(b) Determine saturation pressure of b.
P P P
A RTln B 303 A B
P
ln 0.122 1.13
50 0.251.9975 15kPa 0.751.13
53
B 2501 Jmol
8.40
(a) Plot shows Pxy phase diagram for a binary mixture of species 1 and 2 at 300K.
Vapor, y1=0.67 (b)
P ~ 50 kPa yA~0.77 xA~0.47
54
8.41 (a)
7850 Jmol
0.6
3410 Jmol
0.4
RTln B
A 2050 Jmol A B
ln
2050 0.679 8.314363
From steam tables: 70.1kPa 1.97
(b)
0.41.9770.1kPa 55.3kPa 55kPa
(c)
[
→ 0
[
RTln 3410 Jmol ln 1.13
[
3.09
3.0970.1kPa 217kPa
55
8.42
(a) 1 bar (b) (i) liquid (ii) x1 = 0.2 (iii) 1 mol (c) z1 = 0.6 (i) 2 phases, vapor and liquid (ii) x1 = 0.4, y 1 = 0.74 (iii) apply the lever rule n 0.74 0.6 0.7 nv 0.6 0.4 n l 0.82 mol l
n 1.18 mol v
(d)
y1 P x11 P1sat sat
1
x1P1 0.74 y1P
56
A
RT ln 1 J 2, 040 2 mol x2
(e) y1, A 0.74 x1, A 0.4 F1 F2 V A L A F1 y1, AVA x1, A LA mol s mol LA 0.82 s
VA 1.18
(f) y1, B 0.9 x1, B 0.62 VA VB LB y1, AVA y1, BVB x1, B LB mol s mol LB 0.67 s
VB 0.51
57
8.43 exp 1 RT ln
RT RT B ⟹ B 2 B B
1 ,,
RT RT B B B V V
1 ,,
RT ln ln
,
RT RT B 2 B V V
RT
1 1 2 B 2 B V V
1 P VP 2 B 2 B ln RT V RT
ln ln
2 B 2 B RT
ln ln P P P ln
...