Social Science Theories AND Their Implications TO Education PDF

Preview

Summary

SOCIAL SCIENCE THEORIES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS TO EDUCATION...

Description

CHAPTER 3 SOCIAL SCIENCE THEORIES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS TO EDUCATION Intended Learning Outcome: At the end of the Chapter, the students must be able to explain three social science theories and their implications to education. Introduction Sociologists today employ three primary theoretical perspectives: the functionalist perspective, the conflict perspective, and the symbolic interactionist perspective. These perspectives offer sociologists theoretical paradigms for explaining how society influences people, and how people influence society. Each perspective uniquely conceptualizes society, social forces, and human behavior. Three Social Science Theories 1) Structural-functional Theory Herbert Spencer, the proponent of structural-functional views society as “a system of interconnected parts each with a unique function. The parts have to work together for stability and balance of society.” Society is compared to the human body with different but interrelated parts performing different functions. Just as the human body has many parts, society has different but interrelated components such as the family, state, the school, the Church, mass media, economics. These must coordinate and collaborate for society to function well. If one part of the human body does not function well, the whole body is affected. In the same way, when one component of society does not do its part, society will not function well. The overall health of the organism (society) depends upon the health of each structure. This is exactly the message of the song Dem Bone The bones are interconnected. Each has a unique function. for instance, there is peace, stability, equilibrium, and harmony in society your families do their part in bringing forth children, nurturing and socializing them; if education or schools effectively transmit knowledge, skills, and values; if politics governs citizens well; if economics takes care of food production, distribution of goods and services and if religion strengthens the moral fiber after the members of society. failure of one social institution to do its part means disruption of stability in society. For example, the rise of single parent and dual earner families means families have less time or sometimes no more time left for the supervision of children in their homework which may result to an increase of nonperforming students in school. In a high-tech world, educational institution must teach adults the new skills to relate to the tech-savvy young and the world and to be more effective in the workplace. With more women in the workplace, policies against sexual harassment and discrimination were formulated. The Cybercrime Act of 2012 came about to address legal issues concerning online interactions and the Internet in the Philippines.

Functionalist theory of education focus on how education serves the need of society through the developments of skills encouraging social cohesion. the role of schools is to prepare students for participation in the institutions of society. Education is concerned with transmission of core values first social control. Education is concerned with socializing people by bringing together people from different backgrounds. the functionalist theory is focus on social stability and solidarity. functionalists see education as a beneficial contribution to an ordered society. functionalism does not encourage people the take active role in changing their social environment, even when such change may benefit them. Instead, functionalism sees active social change as undesirable because the various parts of society will compensate naturally, for any problems that may arise. For example, schools can compensate for the lack of time and the lack of parental advice from home. Purposes of Schooling according to Functionalist The purposes of schooling according to the functionalist are: 1) Intellectual purposes- acquisition of cognitive skills, inquiry skills 2) Political purposes- educate future citizens; promote patriotism; promote assimilation of immigrants; ensure order, public civility, and conformity to laws. 3) Economic purposes- prepare students for later work role; select and train the labor force needed by society 4) Social purposes- promote a sense of social and moral responsibility; serve as a site for the solution or resolution of social problems; supplement the efforts of other institutions of socialization such as the family and the church. An examination of the present curricula in basic and in tertiary education shows that these 4 functions are given attention to. 2) Conflict Theory According to this theory, there are always two opposing sides in a conflict situation. People take sides between maintaining the status quo and introducing change then arrive at an agreement. Conflict theory welcomes conflict for that is the way to the establishment of a new society. Conflict theorists find potential conflict between any groups where inequality exists; racial, gender, religious, political, economic, and so on. Conflict theorists note that unequal groups usually have conflicting values and agendas, causing them to compete against one another. This constant competition between groups forms the basis for the everchanging nature of society. The factory workers want change – better working conditions, higher salaries. The factory owners naturally are opposed to such. The resolution of the conflict, however, leads to a compromise, a change in the way the factory is managed where both workers and owners are happy. How Proponents of Conflict Theory Regard Education

According to the conflict theory, education is not truly a social benefit or opportunity as seen by the functionalists. Rather, education is a powerful means of maintaining power structures and creating a docile work force for capitalism. The purpose of education is to maintain social inequality and to preserve the power of those who dominate society and teach those in the working class to accept their position as a lower-class worker of society. Conflict theorists call this the “hidden curriculum”. The “hidden” curriculum socializes young people into obedience and conformity for them to be developed as docile workers. Functionalists disagree strongly. They assert that if schools teach adherence to politics, obedience to rules, respect for persons including authorities, punctuality and honesty, civil right it is because they are the very principles dear to a democratic way of life. It is not because they want to make the workers remain docile, unquestioning, and subservient forever while those in power remain in power. 3) The symbolic interactionist theory perspective Three tenets of symbolic interactionist theory are: 1) An individual’s action depends on meaning. We act based on the meaning we give to symbols. Symbols can be actions, objects, or words. If a student understands that teacher believes in his/her ability he/she tries his/her best prove that indeed he/she is able. If a teacher does otherwise, a student tends to behave in accordance with teacher’s poor perception. 2) Different people may give different meanings to the same thing. When teachers are strict, some students see it as an expression of care. Others may rebel because they perceive teacher’s behavior as limiting their moves and desires. A businessman may look at a tree and starts estimating how much money he can get if he has the tree cut down for lumber. A philosopher or a poet may look at it with the thought, “they also serve who only stand and wait” like John Milton’s from his poem “On his Blindness”. 3) Meanings change as individuals interact with one another. A negative meaning that you used to associate with hospital when you went to a hospital which looked more as a hotel than the usual hospital you know is changed. After you have taught well, your fist impression of teaching as boring is changed to teaching is exciting. Implications to Teaching Let us continue to teach for meaning. Let us promote and create opportunities for genuine interaction among our students, teachers, between students and teachers. Interaction does not only mean dealing with warm bodies. Interaction includes reading, listening, viewing. Other people’s views and meanings are conveyed in what they have written, in speeches and lectures they have delivered. Let us use positive symbols- in the form of gestures, words, actions, and appearancesto express our trust, belief in our students’ abilities, an affirmation of their being. In fact, our belief in our students also has positive effect in us. We find ourselves more prepared in class, more caring, truly professional.

The symbolic interactionist perspective, also known as symbolic interactionism, directs sociologists to consider the symbols and details of everyday life, what these symbols mean, and how people interact with each other. As the term implies, symbolic interactionist theory states that people interact with one another through symbols. Language is a predominant symbol among people. According to the symbolic interactionist perspective, people attach meanings to symbols, and then they act according to their subjective interpretation of these symbols. Verbal conversations, in which spoken words serve as the predominant symbols, make this subjective interpretation especially evident. The words has a certain meaning for the “sender,” and, during effective communication, they hopefully have the same meaning for the “receiver.” In other terms, words are not static “things”; they require intention and interpretation. Conversation is an interaction of symbols between individuals who constantly interpret the world around them. To ensure mutual understanding, the sender of the symbol and the receiver of the symbol must give the same meaning to the symbol or run the risk of misunderstanding. Faculty communication can result from differences in the perception of the same events and symbols. Did you experience this in your activity of giving symbols of caring? While you looked at your symbol as something expressing your love and care, your partner may have not understood it that way at all. This happens in real life. It is important that our symbols are understood by others in the way they were intended to be. Sometimes, it happens in the language (which is a symbol) we speak. Often, we are misunderstood, or we misunderstand other. So, let’s keep on communicating. Weakness of Symbolic Interaction Theory Critics claim that symbolic interactionism neglects the macro level of social interpretation- the “big picture.” In other words, symbolic interactionists may miss the larger issues of society by focusing too closely on the “trees” or by restricting themselves to small or individual interactions. Symbolic interactionism traces its origins to Max Weber’s assertion that individuals act according to their interpretation of the meaning of their world. However, it was the American philosopher George H. Mead (1863-1931) who introduced this perspective to American sociology in the 1920s. TAKEAWAYS  Functionalism is a theory of society that focuses on the structures that create the society and on how the society is able to remain stable.  Functionalists are for stability and a state of equilibrium in society.  To maintain this state of stability, various institutions are expected to do their part.  For the functionalists, change is necessary only when things get unstable.  Conflict theory welcomes conflict for conflict paves the way to change to the establishment of a new society.  Symbolic-interactionist theory is focused on individuals who act based on meaning which is based on the individual’s experience. These meaning are not permanent. They change over time as the individual continues to interact with others and with symbols....