Title | Solvency II in a nutshell pwc |
---|---|
Course | Changes in the environment and risks |
Institution | Sveučilište u Splitu |
Pages | 126 |
File Size | 4.2 MB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 51 |
Total Views | 135 |
Solvency II in a nutshell...
www.pwc.com/cz
Solvency II in a nutshell General overview
Current solvency regime Solvency I
Quantitative requirements • Available solvency capital • Minimum capital requirement • Simple and uniform calculation with no connection to the risk exposure • Very limited calculation and reporting cost • Direct link to the statutory reporting
Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
Future: 3 pillars Solvency II Pillar 1 Quantitative Requirements
Pillar 2 Governance and Supervisory Review
• Market consistent evaluation of assets and liabilities in a specific balance sheet
• Corporate governance
• Solvency capital requirement (SCR):
• Own risk and solvency
• Internal controls and
sound risk management assessment (ORSA)
− Standard formula
• Rules on supervision
− Internal model
• Supervisory intervention
• Minimal capital requirement (MCR)
• Solo and group
Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements • Outside communication of
the outcomes of two other pillars • Public and private (for
supervisory) reports • Narrative reports
(SFCR and RSR) • Quantitative reports
(Annual and quarterly QRTs)
• Own funds and their tiers • Solo and group approach Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
Solvency II framework - an integrated perspective Approval process & supervisory dialogue Supervisory reporting & public disclosure Processes, controls, data & IT Governance & risk framework Process organization SFCR RSR
Process and IT landscape
Organization Functions
Capital requirements
Fit & Proper Calculate SCR and MCR
QRT
Use of Internal Modells
Calculate SCR on group level
Risk strategy Data quality Data policy dates and deadlines
Data security
ORSA Capitalallocation Limit system Risk management process
Solvency balance sheet & own funds
Own funds
Valuation assets, & liabilities
Risk reporting
Business strategy, business management Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
www.pwc.com/cz
Capital evaluation (Pillar 1)
Agenda
The Solvency II balance sheet
1 Solvency II PwC
Solvency capital requirement
2 10.11.2015.
The Solvency II balance sheet
Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
3 pillars Solvency II Pillar 1 Quantitative Requirements
Pillar 2 Governance and Supervisory Review
• Market consistent evaluation of assets and liabilities in a specific balance sheet
• Corporate governance
• Solvency capital requirement (SCR):
• Own risk and solvency
• Internal controls and
sound risk management assessment (ORSA)
− Standard formula
• Rules on supervision
− Internal model
• Supervisory intervention
• Minimal capital requirement (MCR)
• Solo and group
Pillar 3 Disclosure Requirements • Outside communication of
the outcomes of two other pillars • Public and private (for
supervisory) reports • Narrative reports
(SFCR and RSR) • Quantitative reports
(Annual and quarterly QRTs)
• Own funds and their tiers • Solo and group approach Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
Solvency II Balance Sheet Market-consistent approach Ancillary own funds
Off-balance sheet items
SCR Own funds
MCR
Risk margin for non-hedgeable risks Best Estimate Assets Economic value
Technical provisions
market-consistent valuation for hedgeable risks
Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
Valuation of technical provision Amount a reference undertaking is expected to need to accept and cover underlying (re)insurance obligations Valuation as a whole Market-consistent valuation as a whole, if the provisions can be replicated by financial instruments Criteria: • Any uncertainty regarding the amount and length of the obligations is to be reliably replicated • Financial instruments shall have reliable market values
Risk margin • (Risk) amount required for the insurance portfolio to be transferred to a reference undertaking for the term • Calculated with weighted average cost of capital
Best estimate • Probability-weighted average of future cash flows based on the current value of the money and yield curve • Including options and guarantees
Segment into homogenous risk groups, as a minimum by lines of business, as defined by the EIOPA Definition of insurance contracts: Examples of contractual limits that do not belong to the insurance contract: the insurer‘s unilateral right of notice; insurer‘s right to adjust premiums according to risk; obligations resulting from future premium income where the insurance benefit does not include financial guarantees
Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
fair value structure
Recognition and Valuation Principles Assets and other Liabilities 1
Mark-to-market: quoted prices in active markets
2
Marking-to-market: quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities with adjustments to reflect the differences
3
Marking-to-model: Alternative valuation methods; with maximum use of relevant market inputs and rely as little as possible on undertaking specific parameters
Economic approach: Valued with the amount for which the assets/ liabilities could be exchanged / settled between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction. Active market:
Quoted prices are readily and regularly available Actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis
Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
IFRS vs. Solvency II Summary of main differences – Assets (1) Area
IFRS
Solvency II
Significance
Observations
Goodwill
Cost less impairment
Nil
• Goodwill is not considered to have an economic value for Solvency II
Intangible assets
Cost or fair value less depreciation /impairment
Generally nil
• Intangible assets can be recognised at IFRS valuation only where they are separable and there is an active market. This is unlikely in practice.
PPE
Cost or revaluation
Revaluation
• Cost option is not available for Solvency II
Finance leases
Lower of fair value and present value
Fair value
• Finance lease assets should be valued at fair value • Use of depreciated cost is not permitted • The initial valuation of finance lease assets by lessees differs form the approach under IFRS
Investment property
Cost or revaluation
Revaluation
• Cost option is not available for Solvency II
Participations in subsidiaries, associates & JVs
Cost or fair value, unless held for sale
Market price, adjusted equity, mark to model, or nil
• Valuation of participations may be significantly different under Solvency II.
Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
IFRS vs. Solvency II Summary of main differences – Assets (2) Area
IFRS
Solvency II
Financial assets
Amortised cost or fair value
Fair value
• Amortised cost option is not available
Deferred tax assets
Temporary difference * tax rate
As for IFRS but using SII valuation
• The principles for calculating deferred tax are the same but the Solvency II balance sheet valuations must be used
Non-current assets held for sale or discontinued operations
Lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell
Fair value less costs to sell
• Option for a different carrying amount is not available
Current tax asset
Amount expected to be recovered
Amount expected to be recovered
• No difference in valuation
Off balance sheet financing
Not recognised
Recognised where approved
• Off balance sheet financing may be approved as ancillary own funds and recognised on the Solvency II balance sheet
Solvency II PwC
Significance
Observations
10.11.2015.
IFRS vs. Solvency II Summary of main differences – Other liabilities Area
IFRS
Solvency II
Financial liabilities
Amortised cost or fair value
Fair value with no revaluation for own credit standing
• Amortised cost is not available for Solvency II, and Solvency II valuation should not reflect changes in the insurer’s own credit standing
Provisions
Best estimate where probable
Best estimate
• All liabilities are recognised under Solvency II, even where they are currently considered contingent liabilities under IFRS
Deferred tax liabilities
Temporary difference * tax rate
As for IFRS but using SII valuation
• The principles for calculating deferred tax are the same but the Solvency II balance sheet valuations must be used
Current tax liabilities
Amount expected to be paid
Amount expected to be paid
• No difference in valuation
Employee benefits
Valued under IAS19
As for IFRS
• Valued in accordance with IAS19
All other liabilities
Various valuation rules
As for IFRS
• For all liabilities where there is no specific valuation rule for Solvency II, the IFRS valuation is used
Solvency II PwC
Significance
Observations
10.11.2015.
Own funds Step 2 Classify own-fund items into “tiers” on the basis of the type of own funds and the following six criteria
Step 1 Determine on/off balance sheet available own funds Available own funds =
Ancillary own funds
Basic own funds
Assets –
• • • • • •
Subordination Loss absorbency No incentives to redeem No fixed maturity No mandatory servicing costs No encumbrances
Quality
Basic OF
Ancillary OF
High
Tier 1
Tier 2
Mid
Tier 2
Tier 3
Low
Tier 3
Liabilities + Subordinated Liabilities + Other funds available to absorb losses
Step 3 Eligible amounts of tier 2 and tier 3 items subject to quantitative limits Minimum limit Tier 1
Tier 2
Maximum limit Tier 3
Additional requirements for groups: • Own-fund item can, due to legal or regulatory requirements, absorb the losses of another entity in the group (fungibility) • Own-fund item can, due to legal or regulatory requirements, be transferred to another entity in the group (transferability) • Own-fund item must be available for another entity in the group within 9 months
Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
How mature is your Solvency II balance sheet? Infancy Most firms have… • • • • •
Scoping: identified the areas of the balance sheet which are most judgmental or difficult Methodology: performed detailed analysis on individual adjustments to determine methodology and approach Initial Calculation: calculated a summary Solvency II balance sheet at least twice Reconciled: performed a high level reconciliation between their GAAP and Solvency II balance sheets Review: presented and discussed the balance sheet with the board/other relevant governance committees
Market average ...many haven’t …. • Reduced unnecessary estimates: considered where estimation is appropriate, and where it is not – And differentiated between the short and long term • Non insurance valuation: analysed the less obvious areas – E.g. tax • Own Funds: really understood the components of Own Funds, what options this provides, or how calculated in a group situation • Detailed data: formally decided at what ‘level’ they are going to make Solvency II adjustments (which could differ by area) • Best estimate: considered if their Solvency II best estimate contradicts GAAP reserving assumptions/policy • BAU: thought about how the Solvency II Balance Sheet production becomes an ‘as usual’ process • Infrastructure: started building the reporting infrastructure to support ongoing production – E.g. a Solvency II general ledger • Economic profits and losses: really understood the economic movements from period to period inferrred by the Solvency II balance sheet and reconciled the Solvency II economic profit or loss to GAAP • Financial control: extended their financial control framework to cover the Solvency II balance sheet • Assurance: gained assurance over their Solvency II balance sheet from external auditors/Parties (both controls and results) Almost none have… Maturity • Confidence: got the same confidence in Solvency II as they do in their GAAP results Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
Solvency Capital Requirement
Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
Solvency II Balance Sheet Market-consistent approach Off-balance sheet items
Ancillary own funds
SCR Own funds
MCR
Risk margin for non-hedgeable risks Best Estimate Assets Economic value
Technical provisions
market-consistent valuation for hedgeable risks
Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
Supervisory dialogue/actions Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
SCR MCR • No sanctions • Regular reviews
Capital requirements
Solvency II PwC
Sanctions: • Establish a realistic recovery plan and progress report • Increase own funds • Reduce risk profile • Restriction/prohibition of previously allowed free disposal of assets • Capital add-on
Sanctions: • Development of a short-term realistic finance scheme to increase at least to the level of the MCR • Prohibition of free disposal of assets • Withdrawal of authorisation
Own funds
10.11.2015.
Solvency capital requirement (SCR) 0,25
SII confidence level (99,5%)
Best estimate (50%) 0,2
0,15
0,1
0,05
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SCR Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
Requirements for (partial) internal models There are several methods to calculate the SCR Partial and full internal models require prior approval by the regulator
Risk sensitivity
Full internal model
Partial internal model Standard formula with undertakingspecific parameters (USPs) Undertaking-specific parameters require approval by the regulator
Standard formula Standard formula with simplifications
Use of a (partial) internal model for calculation purposes • One or more risk modules or sub modules • Capital requirement for operational risk • For whole business or one or several major business units • Adjustment for the loss-absorbing capacity of technical provisions and deferred taxes
Complexity
Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
Structure of the Standard formula Modular design SCR
Adjustments
Market
BSCR
CDR
Health
operational
Life
Intangible Assets
Non-life
SCR
Currency
SLT Health
Property
Mortality
Interest rate
Longevity
Non-SLT Health
CAT
Mortality
Premium Reserve
Longevity
Lapse
Disability Morbidity
Equity
Disability Morbidity
Lapse
Spread
Lapse
Expenses
Concentration
Expenses Revision
Revision
Premium Reserve
Lapse CAT
= Adjustment for the lossabsorbing capacity of technical provisions
CAT
*EIOPA suggested to replace CCP by a “volatility balancer” Solvency II PwC
10.11.2015.
Solvency Capital Requirement calculation
Assumptions for SCR calculation
SCR calculation
• Going-concern basis
• Assignment of capital market instruments, insurance contracts, counterparties, etc. to risk modules • Calculation of risk capital per module • Aggregation of individual risk capital charges using a correlation matrix
• Calibration to ensure that all quantifiable risks are considered • Risk measure: Value-at-Risk with confidence level of 99.5% over the one-year horizon • Consideration of risk-mitigation techniques, provided that credit and other risk related to such techniques are appropriately reflected in the SCR • Calculate and report results to the Supervisory Authority at least annually • In case of change in risk profile: the Supervisory Authority can demand recalculation of SCR • Calculation of SCR for investment vehicles, mutual funds and other indirect investments which are not affiliated companies is based on the individual target investments (look-through approach)
Solvency II PwC
• BSCR = √∑ · ij
• Adjustment: consideration of risk mitigation effect of future profit sharing and deferred taxes → Calculation of SCRGross and SCRNet
10.11.2015.
Basic Solvency Capital Requirements (BSCR) Calculation with correlation matrix The six types of risks should be combined to an overall “Basic SCR” using a correlation matrix for market, life, health, non-life and default risk
Corr BSCR
SCRMarket
SCRdefault
SCRlife
SCRhealth
SCRMarket
1
SCRdefault
0.25
1
SCRlife
0.25
0.25
1
SCRhealth
0.25
0.25
0.25
1
SCRnon-life
0.25
0.5
0
0
Solvency II PwC
SCRnon-life
1 10.11.2015.
Delta NAV Approach Calculation of capital requirements of sub-modules using shock scenarios Example Longevity Shock (decrease of 20%) Solvency II balance sheet before shock
Solvency II balance sheet after shock
NAVnew
<...