Table 3 illustrates that the data resulted in very comparable results in three cases PDF

Preview

Summary

An introduction to Research ethics can give you some advice and new learning!...

Description

Table 3 illustrates that the data resulted in very comparable results in three cases, particularly in part II. In part I, subject no. 7 has the fewest words, although subjects no. 8 and 9 have the same number of words. I believe that subject no. 7's inability to focus on the part I was due to her surroundings being so noisy and the connectivity being so bad. Since the remaining participants have their own space, they were able to concentrate on the exercise. Subject No.7 began at 4:39 p.m in part I, and after two minutes, she guessed the first word and chatted it on the chatbox. When it comes to guessing the first anagram word, subjects 8 and 9 have a one-minute gap. Part II is the section where they virtually equally conclude to the same conclusion. Subjects 7 and 8 include fourteen words, whereas subject 9 contains twenty-one. When the activity ended, participants said that the most difficult part for them was part I. Because they need to arrange the jumbled letters, and they need to use the whole letters in anagrams. Also, the jumbled letters in anagrams included the letter x, and the word they made was incompatible with letters in anagrams, which is why people had difficulty predicting it. They like generating a new word in part II since they don't have any restrictions on how they utilize the letters....