2135 A Sep 16 - Lecture Notes PDF

Title 2135 A Sep 16 - Lecture Notes
Author Tanya Handa
Course Cognitive Psychology
Institution The University of Western Ontario
Pages 3
File Size 82.1 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 57
Total Views 158

Summary

Lecture by Steven Lupker on the topic of sensory memory and how it came to be ...


Description

Sensory Memory Saccade - rapid movement of the eye between fixation points. ● Our eyes don’t move around smoothly, they jump from place to place. ● You will be stationary for a millisecond and then jump in about 50 milliseconds, during that time, you can’t take any information. ● 200 milliseconds of seeing and then 50 milliseconds of not seeing but the world still looks continuous. ● Therefore, the concept of sensory memory comes in because there is some system that allows us to perceive, even when there is a break in our vision. ● In the 1950s, people believed that our visual system was continuous and there was no need to consider the possibility of sensory memory.  George Sperling ○ He was interested in how many things you can perceive in one glance ■ What is the span of apprehension ○ Short term memory had started being studied with passion during this time ○ Showed people various arrays of letters, on a screen. Anywhere from one to 12 letters, varying from letter to letter. Task: Report as many letters as you can. Letters were only there for 50 milliseconds ○ He found if you 1-5 letters, people would usually be able to recall them all ■ Referred to as the whole report technique ■ Normal dependent variable: probability correct ■ Sterling’s dependent variable: number of items available to report ■ So he found around 4.5 to 5 items are available to report ■ Limitations: ● You may have seen more than the letters you report but short term memory limits your capacity so chances to recall all the items you saw are low ● Interference - you  get the sequence of numbers but while you are trying to remember the first couple numbers, you forget the rest because the information starts interfering ○ Sterling created the partial  report procedure to combat the first limitation ■ You are presented with a stimulus for 50 ms and then at some interstimulus interval after the stimulus has gone away, you get an auditory queue that tells you which part of the sequence you are supposed to report ■ He found that you can get pretty close to being perfect if the queue was given very quickly. Brighter stimulus = performance goes up, blurry and dim = performance goes down. ■ If you have a queue early enough, everything will go into short term memory ○ Interstimulus interval (ISI) - when one stimulus ends and when the other one begins. ● If everything gets in short term memory, then it is not visual anymore. So, the visual nature of the queue should not matter.  Stimulus is NOT the same on every trial, it changes.

Averbach and Coriell (1961) ● Concluded that stimulus may be on screen for 50 ms but stimulus continues to be perceived after it leaves the screen, alluding to sensory memory system. ● They only asked people to recall one item out of the 16 displayed, in their experiment. ○ Eliminates issues with short term memory ● Used visual queues ● Performance goes down as intervals are delayed, better when they are quick ● They said if you are right and stuff is in STM, the nature of the queue should be irrelevant. When we use a bar marker, it is irrelevant. Visible nature of queue shouldn’t matter ● In the second condition, they used a circle with cross hatches inside (grid), occurring right on top where the letter used to be. ● If all this information is in STM, visual nature of the queue should not matter. ● Normally, short ISI, people recall better, if you let ISI grow, people recall worse. ● When the “grid” comes on top of the letter quickly, nobody recalled it. You can’t perceive the stimulus. Delaying the grid, gives you a better chance. You can’t see the letter because the stimulus has obscured it. ● The only way you can interfere with perception is if the perception is not over. If you can obscure it, even if the stimulus is gone, then it means perception isn’t over. Therefore, we have sensory memory, perceiving the stimulus even after it has been removed. ● They set off a tidal wave of backward masking experiments Backward masking  - interfering with something you did a while ago with something you’re doing now.  Present a stimulus then present another one shortly after, and the second one prevenits you perceiving the first one accurately. 

Sensory Memory → Short Term Memory Perceiving the features of a stimulus helps you recognize what it is. Over time, features accumulate and get tied together. Perception works as a feature cumulation process.  Pandemonium Model (1959) - based on the idea that we have a bunch of different demons that allow us to do things, they all have certain roles and do certain things. If stimulus out there is like what the demons are responsible, they start to show and the one that shouts the loudest, is the one that the letter is. Example: the letter R is seen by the image demon, then it goes into the cortical “stew.” then the feature demons, who each have a role in identifying (vertical line demon, horizontal line demon, right angle demon, etc). Feature demons record each line of the letter (vertical line demon recognizes the vertical line and so on). Then, the cognitive demons are responsible for each of the letters. Each letter has their own demon, and each demon gets excited when the feature demons find information that identifies with their letter. The R demon screams the loudest because it matches, then the decision demon evaluates all the information and the screaming and makes the decision.  1960: ● People tried to figure out what the features we accumulated were

● Scientists were interested in what mistakes we made when perceiving and how ○ If people confuse E and F, we can tell that they are perceptually similar and they share features. 1977: ● We have been working with the idea that perception is a feature accumulation process and we’re not getting anywhere. We don’t know what the features are or how they work ● Navon suggested initial moments of perceptions are something that later refine themselves -- what you get very early in perception is just a blurry representation of what the stimulus actually is. Like focusing ● Global to local processing - what you see initially is the global and what you see near the end is the local....


Similar Free PDFs