Title | 8. Normative Theory |
---|---|
Author | bansi mehta |
Course | International Relations Theories and Issues |
Institution | Aston University |
Pages | 1 |
File Size | 52.7 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 69 |
Total Views | 155 |
Download 8. Normative Theory PDF
IR Theories 8. Normative Theory ‘Empirical’ vs ‘Normative’ Theory Empirical Theory: E.H. Carr: ‘Any account of IR should take at its starting point what is rather than what ought to be’. Empirical evidence acquired by observation and experimentation. Seeks to discover and describe facts, the accuracy of which can be tested. Positivist theories of IR. Normative Theory: Focus on how things ought to be Seeks to determine and prescribe values, evaluative standards. Expression of a preference for a particular type of order, as dictated by a sense of duty, universal need, or commitment to a moral principle. Making judgments about behaviors/outcomes. Not capable of being discovered, described or verified. Normative Theory and IR Problems with mainstream IR notion that facts and values can be separated: Restricts definition of what politics (including international political theory) is all about supports a particular status quo ‘All theories reflect values’ ‘Return’ of normative theory is driven by several factors: it is more important to be relevant to contemporary needs than to be methodologically sophisticated behavioural science conceals an ideology based upon empirical conservatism (i.e. ALL theory is normative and empirical) behavioural research, by its focus on abstraction, loses touch with reality the political scientist has the obligation to make knowledge available for the general benefit of society (Otherwise – what’s the point???)...