A Case study on Childbed Fever GNED 1103 PDF

Title A Case study on Childbed Fever GNED 1103
Author Agustina Zaballa
Course Innovation
Institution Mount Royal University
Pages 2
File Size 89.5 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 31
Total Views 171

Summary

Childbed fever assignment. Contains the required reading and questions regarding the case study....


Description

A Case study on CHILDBED FEVER A Nineteenth-Century Mystery This case provides a brief, factual account of the pioneering work of Ignaz Semmelweis and his efforts to remedy the problem of childbed fever in mid-nineteenth century Europe. This is a group activity, work as a group to answer the following questions. Neatly type in your answers. PART I Ignaz Semmelweis, a young Hungarian doctor working in the obstetrical ward of Vienna General Hospital in the late 1840s, was dismayed at the high death rate among his patients. He had noticed that nearly 20% of the women under his and his colleagues care in "Division I" of the ward (that is, the division attended by physicians and male medical students) died shortly after childbirth. This phenomenon had come to be known as "childbed fever." Alarmingly, Semmelweis noted that this death rate was four to five times greater than that in "Division II" of the ward (that is, the division attended by female midwifery students).

Short answer questions: Thinking about the steps in the scientific method, use the paragraph above (Part I) to answer the following questions. Neatly type in the questions and answers. 1.What were Semmelweis's initial observations? 2.What was the problem at hand? 3.Explain briefly, how might Semmelweis test his suspicions? (what would be his hypothesis?) PART II One day, Semmelweis and some of his colleagues were in the autopsy room performing autopsies as they often did between deliveries. They were discussing their concerns about death rates from childbed fever. One of Semmelweis's friends was distracted by the conversation, and he punctured his finger with the scalpel. Days later, Semmelweis's friend became quite sick, showing symptoms not unlike those of childbed fever. His friend's ultimate death strengthened Semmelweis's resolve to understand and prevent childbed fever. Short answer questions: use the paragraph in part II to answer the following questions 4.What might Semmelweis now propose as an explanatory story? 5.How could Semmelweis test his new hypothesis? PART III In an effort to curtail the deaths in his ward due to childbed fever, Semmelweis instituted a strict handwashing policy amongst his male medical students and physician colleagues in "Division I" of the ward. Everyone was required to wash their hands with chlorinated lime water prior to attending patients. Mortality rates immediately dropped from 18.3% to 1.3% and, in fact, not a single woman died from childbirth between March and August of 1848 in Semmelweis' division. Short answer question: use the paragraph in part III to answer the following question 6. What conclusions can be drawn from Semmelweis's experiment?

PART IV Semmelweis’s observations conflicted with the established scientific and medical opinions existed at that time. For example, his findings ran against the conventional wisdom that diseases spread in the form of “bad air”, also known as miasmas or vaguely as “unfavourable atmospheric-cosmic-terrestrial influences”. Semmelweis was convinced that every case of childbed fever was caused by resorption (the process or action by which something is reabsorbed) of cadaveric particles (cadaveric means relating to or from a dead body). With this etiology, Semmelweis identified childbed fever a disease purely caused by doctors. Doctors somehow could not accept the fact that they themselves were responsible for death of their patients. He was met with resistance from his own colleagues. Despite the dramatic reduction in the mortality rate in Semmelweis' ward, his colleagues and the greater medical community greeted his findings with hostility or dismissal. Even after presenting his work on childbed fever (more technically referred to as puerperal sepsis) to the Viennese Medical Society, Semmelweis was not able to secure the teaching post he desired, and so he returned to Hungary. There, he repeated his successful handwashing attack on childbed fever at the St. Rochus hospital in Pest. In 1860, Semmelweis finally published his principal work on the subject of puerperal sepsis but this, too, was dismissed. It is believed that the years of controversy and repeated rejection of his work by the medical community caused him to suffer a mental breakdown. Semmelweis died in 1865 in an Austrian mental institution. Some believe that his own death was ironically caused by puerperal sepsis.

Short answer questions: use the paragraph in part IV to answer the following questions 7. When presented with what appears to be unequivocal evidence in support of handwashing, why might Semmelweis's colleagues have dismissed his ideas? 8. How else might Semmelweis has approached the problem of disseminating his research findings in order to ensure their acceptance?

Christa Colyer School of Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology Date Posted: 12/08/99 nas. Revised 03/12/03. Copyright © 2003 by the National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science. Please see our usage guidelines, which outline our policy concerning permissible reproduction of this work....


Similar Free PDFs