Title | CAMHS - Attachment Disorders |
---|---|
Author | Hannah Barr |
Course | Psychiatry |
Institution | National University of Ireland Galway |
Pages | 4 |
File Size | 100.4 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 87 |
Total Views | 122 |
Notes on Attachment Disorders for Child and Adolescent Mental Health Psychiatry ...
CAMHS – Attachment & Attachment Disorders Attachment Attachment refers to the strong emotional bond that exists between a child and a caregiver Develops through appropriate sensitive parental responses to the child’s behavioural cues Allows the child to develop an understanding of his ‘inner world’ + how to safely explore the world around him Establishes beliefs in the child’s mind around the consistency & reliability of relationships o Foundation of safe separation o Development of autonomy John Bowlby A child’s need to be attached to protective figures is as basic as the child’s need for food o Contradicted earlier theories that attachment was due to the association of parents + food Supported by Harlow’s infant monkey experiment o Contact comfort with the softness of a cloth was more important than feeding in the formation of an infant monkey’s attachment to its mother Children usually develop attachment to small group of people at age 6-12 months Separation from caregivers is usually well -tolerated in early infancy as long as the substitute care is good o Separation between the ages 6 months and 4 years is more stressful Bowlby’s conclusion was that to grow up mentally healthy the infant should experience intimate & continuous relationship with mother/caregiver, that both find satisfactory & joyful Sequence for Development of Attachment Phase 1 Birth 8-12 weeks
Phase 2
3 6 months
Phase 3
6 months 3 years
Infants visually tracking, smiling & babbling Behaviours sustain the attention of other & their proximity to the infant Infants are more marked towards mother / father Social responses more selective Principle attachment figure begins to emerge Infant focusses on attachment figure cries when tried to leave Strangers treated with caution Separation anxiety
Phase 4
3 years end of childhood
Attachment Style Secure Parents are affectionate & reliable Child values relationships Confident in self-worth
Stranger anxiety Child has developed a greater understanding of parents’ plans can envision parents’ behaviour while separated Child is more willing + able to let go
Insecure Parents are unresponsive & unreliable child shows little reaction parent’s presence or absence Children often cry / act out to convey anger
Securely attached (% of non-clinical samples) 60%
Insecurely attached
Attachment style Secure
Characteristic Child Behaviour Child values relationships & is confident of self-worth Uses caregiver as a secure base from which to explore May be distressed by separation On reunion greets caregiver positively o May seek comfort o Then gets on with play / exploring Child appears emotionally independent Does not value relationship Explores with little reference to caregiver Minimally distressed by separation Ignores caregiver on reunion Values relationship BUT is cautious about their safety Minimal exploration Highly distressed by separation Hard to settle on reunion o Ambivalent mixture of
Insecure – avoidant
Insecure – ambivalent
Avoidant 15% Ambivalent 10% Disorganised 15%
Insecure – disorganised
Insecure – anxious
clinging + anger Neither effectively self-sufficient NOR able to use relationships Lack of coherent pattern in exploratory or reunion behaviours Fear or confusion in caregiver’s presence o Suggested by disorganised behaviours o Rocking / covering face / freezing Self-worth depends on approval of others Values relationships but sees then as unreliable Develops strategies for achieving attention
Consequence Different attachment styles can co-exist Parental style can influence style heavily Early attachment experiences typically have long lasting effects o Effects are not totally irreversible o Can be changed by radically altered life circumstances In general, securely attached children do better o However, not all securely attached children do well and not all insecurely attached children do poorly Disorganised attachment is the strongest predictor of externalising problems Secure attachment More likely to form harmonious relationships with adults & children More cooperative with mothers More likely to comfort younger siblings More likely to have good friends Less likely to be non-compliant with parents / quarrelsome with siblings / controlling with friends Better able to ask for teacher’s help More popular with classmates / less victimised More empathetic with peers / less conflict in playing Reactive Attachment Disorder of Childhood Starts within first 5 years Characterised by persistent abnormalities in the child’s pattern of social relationships Abnormalities are associated with emotional disturbances + reactive to changes in environment o Fearfulness + hypervigilance o Poor social interactions with peers
o Aggression towards self & others o Misery o Growth failure in some cases Aetiology Probably occurs as a direct result of severe o Parental neglect o Abuse o Serious mishandling o Being raised in institutions Clinical features 1. Lack of social & emotional responses 2. Absence of attachment behaviours even in times of stress 3. Problems with emotional regulation 4. Lack of positive emotional responses o With negative responses seen despite minimal triggers 5. Impairments in social & emotional reciprocal interactions Disinhibited Attachment Disorder of Childhood...