Central Administration of Akbar PDF

Preview

Summary

Central Administration of Akbar...

Description

Central Administration of Akbar The establishment of a stable government, as well as other social and cultural activities, distinguishes the mughal rule. The arts of living flourished during this time. We were living through a period of profound change that was not always visible on the surface of things, but which unmistakably shaped and moulded the socioeconomic life of our country. Akbar was concerned with the development of a national culture and a national outlook, and as a result, he encouraged and initiated policies in the religious, political, and cultural spheres that were intended to broaden the outlook of his contemporaries and instill in them the consciousness of belonging to a single culture and civilization. The emperor took unjust pride in the fact that he had not found a capable minister, because otherwise people would have given the minister credit for the emperor's measures. However, there is ample evidence to show that Akbar benefited greatly from the council of able administrators and that he should have taken more pride in this fact. 1 It was conceded that a monarch should not perform duties that could be performed by his subjects; however, he did not do so for reasons of administrative efficiency, but rather because "the errors of others it is his part to remedy, but his own lapses, who may correct? 2 The Mughals were able to establish such a position and functions for the emperor in the popular mind, an image that can be seen clearly not only in historical and literary works of the time, but also in folklore, which continues to exist today in the form of popular stories narrated in the villages of the areas that comprised the Mughal's vast dominions when his power was still strong. The emperor was regarded as the father of the people, whose role it was to

protect the weak and bring the persecuted into the middle of society. It is true that there have been instances of rebellion that needed to be put down, as well as conquest or retaliation wars, but these have not been successful in completely erasing the image among the general public. 3 Abul Fazl contributed to the development of the Mughal theory of kingship by adding a new dimension. According to him, rather than the individual who held the office of king, the institution of kingship was endowed with farri-izadi (divine effulgence). It was his padshah or shahanshah (king of kings) who was a one-ofa-kind personality and who served as God's viceregent on earth. An additional important scholar on this subject was Shaikh Abdul Haqq Dihlawi, who lived during Jahangir's reign and wrote a treatise on the subject known as the Nuriyya-i-Shltaniyya, which covers all aspects of the subject. Absolute sovereignty or absolute monarchy, both internally and externally, for the sovereign or king. Every institution and individual was subordinate to the king on an internal level. The Mughal Sovereign did not recognise any superior authority, such as the caliph, on the outside, as had been done by the Delhi Sultans, who had done so. Mughal ambitions included bringing under their imperial control not only the entire Indian subcontinent but also lands beyond the Indian subcontinent, such as Afghanistan and Central Asia, among other places. The Mughal administration was built on a foundation of dynastic loyalty. Despite the fact that administrative positions were theoretically open to anyone, in practise only those with royal origins were appointed to positions of authority, and government servants owed loyalty to the dynasties rather than to the institution.

4 The sovereign was at the epicentre of the entire structure or government. During the royal audience with the sovereign, all important matters pertaining to appointment and incrementation, jagirs, government grants, mansabs, order of payment, petition of prince governor's, bakhshir, diwan and faujdars, and private petitions sent through nobles were brought before him. It was important to maintain the daily routine even when the sovereign travelled. Bairam Khan's unrestricted use of the powers of a Wazir served as a warning against the appointment of an all-powerful Wazir in the future. Despite the fact that the Vakil's position was preserved, none of the Vakils who followed Bairam Khan exercised the authority and influence of a Prime Minister. The Mughal empire was divided into Subah or Provinces, which were further subdivided into Sarkar's, Pargana's, and villages, which were all subdivided further into villages. However, it also had territorial units such as 'Khalisa' (Royal Land), Jagirs (Autonomous Rajas), and inams, which were administrative divisions of the state (gifted lands mainly waste land). During Akbar's reign, there were twelve territorial units, which increased to twenty-one during Aurangzeb's reign, when there were twenty-one territorial units. Administrative agencies in the provinces under Mughal rule were exact replicas of the administrative agencies in the capital city of Islamabad. The principles of uniformity served as the foundation for the provincial administration. In collaboration with Qazi-ul-Quzat, the Mughals managed the country's judicial administration with efficiency. He was also in charge of overseeing the administration of justice in the empire's courts. The cases were heard at the provincial level by the Sardar, Kotwal Muqaddam, and Chowkidar. Amil was in attendance to hear the consumer cases. The Mansabdari system,

which was instituted by Akbar in 1573-74, served as the structural framework for the emperor's military policy. The mansabdar was a government official who, in exchange for his salary, was expected to provide a specific number of cavalry to the imperial army. Salient features of the mansabdari system were as follows  Mansabdar’s were graded into 39 classes, ranging from commander’s of 10 to 10,000.  Twin ranks- Zat and Sawar-were allotted. The former indicated a noble’s personal status, while the latter, the number of troops he had to maintain.  Mansabdari had three scale gradations : (1) Mansabdar (500 Zat and below), (ii) Amir (between 500-2500 Zat), (iii) Amir-i-Umda (2500 Zat and above).  Mansab was not an hereditary system, mansabdars were paid through revenue assignments (jagirs) land was classified into four types : Polaj (continuously cultivated), Parauti (left fallow for a year or two or recover productivity), chachar (left fallow for three or four years) and Banjar (uncultivated for five years or more). During the early years of Akbar reign several revenue experiments were made.

Here were three principal revenue systems in the mughal empire which may be dercribed as follows : Ghallabaksh or Crop division : Under this system, the state received a portion of the proceeds from each crop. His system was in place in lower sind, which included parts of Kabul and Kashmir. Under this system, the state received a

portion of the proceeds from each crop. His system was in place in lower sind, which included parts of Kabul and Kashmir. Zabti System : Todarmal, who was appointed as Akbar's financial minister (diwan-i-ashraf) in 1552, established a standard system of revenue administration known as the Zabti System, which was based on regulations and standards. In addition to large parts of Rajputana, Malwa, and Gujarat, this system was implemented from Bihar to Multan. Using this system, land parcels were precisely measured and surveyed. The Polaj and Parauts lands were subdivided into three classifications (Good, mild and bad). The average produce was calculated by taking the mean of the three grades into consideration. The state's demand accounted for one-third of the total amount of produce. The settlement under the Zabti system was made directly with the Cultivator, rather than through a middleman. Under the Zabti system, cash rates were set based on an average of ten years' actual experience, i.e. on the basis of ten years' previous experience. As a result, this system is also referred to as the Dahsala system. The following are some of the benefits of the Dahasala system:  It enabled the administrators to guess fairly the revenue of the state.  Cultivators knew what they were required to pay.  The state provided loans to cultivators in the event of unforeseen circumstances such as natural disasters, and the government promised to reduce the cash revenue as a result.

 During bad seasons, revenue remissions were granted to farmers. (III) Nasaq or estimation: The present was determined by a previous assessment. Todarmal gathered the accounts of the Qanungos and, in some cases, verified their accuracy by conducting local inquiries on their behalf. He compiled the Surabh's rent roll using the information from these accounts. The Nasacal system did not rely on the results of a survey or on seasonal records of agricultural produce. It had a similar appearance to the Zamindari settlement....