Clinton v City of New York PDF

Preview

Summary

Case study on Clinton V city and it was done for CRJ...

Description

Jennifer Klein Profesor Rice POL 100 December 3,2020 Clinton v City of New York The Clinton v City of New York was a legal case that was brought before the Supreme Court in 1998. This case merges two separate difficulties to the constitutionality of two cancellations, made by President Clinton under the Line Item Veto ("Act"). In the main, the City of New York, two clinic affiliations, a medical clinic, and two medical services associations, tested the President's dropping of an arrangement in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 which allowed the Federal Government's capacity to recover almost $2.6 billion in duties required against Medicaid suppliers by the State of New York. Furthermore, the Snake River rancher's help and one of its own members tested the President's retraction of an arrangement of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. The arrangement allowed some food purifiers and processors to acknowledge their capital additions in return for offering their stock to qualified ranchers' cooperatives. After an area court held the Act unlawful, the Supreme Court allowed certiorari to appeal quickly.In the end The Court held that by canceling only selected portions of the bills at issue, under authority granted him by the Act, the President in actuality "amended" the laws before him.This is because the Act's cancellation procedures violate the Presentment Clause, Act. I, § 7, cl. 2....