Cost control analysis PDF

Title Cost control analysis
Course Financing Enterprises
Institution Western Sydney University
Pages 2
File Size 59.9 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 4
Total Views 140

Summary

question 3 group asssignment about cost control analysis...


Description

Cost control analysis is important to determine the ability of a firm to manage their expenses and earn a reasonable profit margin, which can be done by calculating its gross profit margin (GPM), operating profit margin (OPM), and net profit margin (NPM). GPM measures the ability of a firm’s management to regulate its expenses to make profits (Western Sydney University, 2021). Moreover, Bloomenthal explains that change in GPM could indicate the lack of management’s ability to control its production cost, but can also be validated when a firm changes its business model which should cause no long term issue (Bloomenthal, 2021). According to the data in Appendix 3, Boral limited (BDL) GPM decreases from 33.70% in 2019 to 30.09% in 2020. The decrease in GPM indicates BDL’s operation efficiency is low. An increase in cost of goods sold (COGS), which can be caused by rise in supply’s prices, can influence a decrease in revenue, which can lead to GPM to drop. BDL has an increase to its COGS from $3,845,000 to $3,965,000 between 2019 and 2020, which could explain the influence it has had on the GPM drop (Morningstar DatAnalysis Premium 2021). In comparison, FFI Holdings Limited (FFI) GPM is increasing from 24.29% in 2019 to 26.44% in 2020 (Appendix 3). A higher percentage of GPM suggests that FFI has better operation efficiency. FFI managed to reduce its COGS from $29,827,026 to $25,767,000, which resulted in a rise in its revenue, which led to the GPM to increase (Morningstar DatAnalysis Premium 2021). OPM measures the firm’s ability to make profits after deducting COGS and operating expenses (Western Sydney University, 2021). Besides its GPM, BDL OPM is also decreasing from 11.37% in 2019 to 5.94% in 2020 (Appendix 3). Similarly to GPM, a drop in OPM suggests a firm’s ability to control its cost is poor due to its higher COGS and operating expenses, compared to the profit it makes on each sale. There is a slight increase in BDL COGS and operating expenses between 2019 and 2020, which influence the profit it makes on each sale, hence the drop in its OPM (Morningstar DatAnalysis Premium 2021). On the other hand, FFI has better management of their COGS and operating expenses, as its OPM rises from 10.51% in 2019 to 12.82% in 2020. Based on the data collected from Morningstar DatAnalysis Premium in 2021, FFI has a lower COGS and operating expenses between 2019 and 2020, which results in a rise in its profit and boosting its OPM. NPM measures the profit a firm’s make from each sale after deducting all its expenses (Western Sydney University, 2021). Murphy explains that NPM can also be used to analyse different businesses’ profitability whether they have the same size or not (Murphy, 2021). In 2019, BDL NPM dropped almost by half from 7.59% to 3.22% in 2020 (Appendix 3). This significant drop of NPM could be caused by a few things, such as poor management, large expenses, and poor planning for pricing (CFI, 2021). In contrast to BDL, FFI has a slight increase on its NPM from 8.37% in 2019 to 9.81% in 2020 (Appendix). A rise in NPM is due to the ability to manage, low expenses, and good planning for pricing (CFI, 2021). Even though the FFI NPM number seems smaller compared to BBL due to the different size of both businesses, FFI shows the ability to manage their cost better and makes more profit from each of its sale compared to BBL.

413 word1137...


Similar Free PDFs