Title | County of Sacramento v. Lewis |
---|---|
Course | Constitutional Law II |
Institution | Touro College |
Pages | 2 |
File Size | 64.7 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 52 |
Total Views | 155 |
Constitutional Law II 2020 case brief for COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO...
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO v. LEWIS 523 U.S. 833 (1998) FACTS: Parties: Appellant: County of Sacramento (Δ) Appellee: Lewis (Π) Procedural History:
District court granted SJ in favor of Π
9th Circuit reversed
Relevant Facts:
Smith, a sheriff’s deputy, responded to a call along with Stapp
Stapp returned to his patrol car and saw a motorcycle, carrying Π as passenger, approaching at high speed
Stapp turned on his rotating lights, yelled for the cycle to stop and pulled his car closer to Smith’s in an attempt to pen the cycle in
Cycle maneuvered between the two cars and sped off
Smith immediately switched on his own emergency lights and siren and began a high speed chase
The chase ended after the cycle tipped over
Smith slammed on his brakes but the car skidded into Π causes injuries and death
Π brought claim of violation of due process right to life
ISSUE:
Whether a police officer violates the 14th Amendment guarantee of due process when he causes a death through deliberate or reckless indifference to life in a high speed automobile chase
PARTIES’ ARGUMENTS: Appellant: Appellee:
DISPOSITION OF THE COURT:
Reversed
RULE OF LAW:
A police officer does not violate the 14th Amendment guarantee of due process when he causes a death through deliberate or reckless indifference to life in a high speed automobile chase; to reach that level, there must be evidence of intent to harm
HOLDING:
Δ did not violate Π’s 14th Amendment right life by cause the death through deliberate or reckless indifference to life in the high speed chase
COURT’S REASONING:
Π’s claims are insufficient to state a due process violation Only the most egregious executive action can be said to be arbitrary in the constitutional sense The action must shock the conscience Liability for negligently inflicted harm is categorically beneath the constitutional due process threshold Rules of due process are not subject to mechanical application in unfamiliar territory...