Title | Diffusion and osmosis lab |
---|---|
Author | Pichi Maurant |
Course | Organic chemistry I/lab |
Institution | Nova Southeastern University |
Pages | 4 |
File Size | 121.3 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 26 |
Total Views | 168 |
lab ...
Maria Maurant BIOL 1500- DAF Sarah Koerner October 1st, 2018
Diffusion and Osmosis Lab
Time (m)
Absorbance Averages Experimental 0.0375 0.0156 0.0113 0.0189 0.0905 0.0316 0.0163
Control 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0.8070 1.9660 2.1990 2.2453 2.8608 3.2800 3.4913
Average Absorbance of solution outside the bag 4.0000 3.5000 3.0000 2.5000 2.0000 1.5000 1.0000 0.5000 0.0000
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Time (m) Control
Experimental
Figure 1: In figure 1, the absorbance of the solutions outside the bag are shown, this shows that the experimental values were much higher than the control ones, the highest being 30 minutes (3.5000). One can interpret that the lower the time, the lower the absorbance and the higher the time, the higher the absorbance.
Concentration of Sucrose (M)
Average %
Average SD
0.0
63.6115
8.1197
0.2
42.5845
10.8133
0.4
8.0156
10.9691
0.6
-34.5334
12.1918
0.8
-47.0435
14.1625
1.0
-60.7923
13.7743
-24.6433
9.1652
unknown
Average % of concentration of glucose 80.0000 60.0000 40.0000 Average %
20.0000 0.0000 -20.0000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
-40.0000 -60.0000 -80.0000
Figure 2: The average % of concentration of glucose is shown. The values have a pattern in which, the lower the concentration of sucrose, the higher the average %. The higher the concentration of sucrose, the lower the average %.
Average % of concentration of glucose 80.0000 60.0000 40.0000 20.0000
Average %
0.0000 -20.0000
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 unknown
-40.0000 -60.0000 -80.0000
Figure 3: The average % of concentration of glucose is shown in bar graphs. This graph refers back to figure 2 in regards of how the values are behaving.
Contents in beaker
% Change in mass 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Unknown
11.3890 3.8110 -6.0980 -21.1510 -25.5120 -28.7550 -16.1160
Discussion: Starting with Figure 1, the average absorbance of solution outside the bad, depending on the time the absorbance averages were altered. In this case, all averages increased, but they were more likely to increase if they were kept longer. Even the control for 0 minutes had an increase of 0.7695. The one with the highest absorbance average was the 30 minute one. Figure 2, The average % of concentration of glucose is shown. The values have a pattern in which, the lower the concentration of sucrose, the higher the average %. The higher the concentration of sucrose, the lower the average %. Figures 3, bar graphs represent the % of concentration of glucose. Bar graphs are shown to be negative from 0.6-unknown. As a class, the general trend as a whole was consistent throughout also the standard deviation.
Citation:
Kevi nM.Bonney .( 2014) .Fr om GummyBear st oCel er ySt al ks: Di ffusi onandOsmosi s.Jour nal ofCol l egeSci enceTeachi ng,( 6) ,72. Ret r i ev edf r om ht t p: / / sear ch. ebscohos t . com. ezpr oxy l ocal . l i br ar y . nov a. edu/ l ogi n. aspx ? di r ec t =t r ue&db=eds j sr &AN=edsj sr . 43631762&si t e=edsl i v e...