Discovery Report Rubric V2020 PDF

Preview

Summary

Download Discovery Report Rubric V2020 PDF

Description

D&IF Discovery Report Rubric Criteria Background Context 30%

Fail 0 – 49%

Pass 50 – 64%

Credit 65 – 74%

Distinction 75 – 84%

High Distinction 85 – 100%

The report does not demonstrate an understanding of the subject area within the Australian context. There is no evidence of research in the report, or it is not relevant.

The report shows a basic understanding of the subject area. There is evidence of research and the sources are relevant.

The report demonstrates a good understanding of the subject area with at least 3 sources of information used.

The report demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject area and its impact. Information is synthesised from a range of different types of sources. All sources are current, reliable, and relevant.

Stakeholders and empathy 40%

There are fewer than 6 different stakeholder groups identified, or the impact on the stakeholders is not explained.

At least 6 stakeholder groups are identified with discussion about the impact on each. There is evidence of research and the sources are relevant and reliable.

There is some detail on each of the stakeholder groups and the impact each feels from the subject area. Based on research on each of the stakeholder groups

The report demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject area including a its history and effect within Australia. At least 3 sources of information used, and they are effectively synthesised. All are current, reliable and relevant. Most of the stakeholder groups are written about in detail. The report shows a deeper understanding of how the subject area has affected each group. A range of types of sources is used.

Communication 30%

Language is not professional (colloquialisms, slang, or firstperson perspective). And / or There is no discernible structure. And / or Significant sections are poorly written and cannot be understood. There are no in-text citations or a reference list.

Language is generally professional but may include some slang or colloquialisms. There may be spelling or grammar mistakes, but the report is understandable. There is an attempt to correctly structure the report. There are citations and a reference list but they are incomplete or in the wrong style. Titlepage includes student, tutorial, and assessment details.

Language is professional but there may be some jargon not appropriate for the audience. There may be a few spelling or grammar mistakes. The report is structured appropriately for a professional report, but section headings may not be descriptive. Most citations and references are present and in APA style, but with many errors.

Language is professional without unnecessary jargon. There may be one or two spelling or grammar mistakes. The report is reasonably well structured with clear and informative section and subsection headings. All sources are cited and referenced using APA Style (7th ed) but there may be some minor errors.

Language is professional and written for DIFCo management. There are no spelling or grammar mistakes. Structured as a professional report with a clear and logical flow of information, sections and subsections, and descriptive title and headings. All sources are cited and referenced correctly, using APA Style (7th Ed)

V2020.3

All of the stakeholder groups are written about in detail. The report shows a deep understanding of how the subject area has affected each group in multiple ways. Information is synthesised from a wide range of sources....