Title | English Lit notes 12-7-2016 |
---|---|
Author | Melissa Aguerre |
Course | World Literature |
Institution | Kean University |
Pages | 2 |
File Size | 57.9 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 92 |
Total Views | 134 |
Download English Lit notes 12-7-2016 PDF
December 7, 2016 Notes
Flight o o o
Plight of social outcast Social condition of self-social education Social construct of identity Cultural/ethnic Gender Class o Importance of history o Free will vs. social determinism o Loneliness in the modern world o Violence + Power o Problem with self-interest Research Paper Notes o Purpose of Paper Research paper contributes to an ongoing scholarly debate on a literary work or topic You are offering YOUR ideas on the topic A research paper is NOT a report or synthesis of other people’s ideas. Arguing for the validity of your interpretation of the novel. Embody the text with A CLOSE READING OF THE TEXT o Opening and Thesis Opening paragraph works general to specific Introduce subject Formulates your overall stance in a clear and detailed thesis statement Poor thesis Statements Too broad: Oedipus changes at the end of the short story Too broad and vague: Victor Frankenstein and the Creature are alike, yet very different. Too factual: Many critics see Stanley as a symbol of the modern man in the new industrial America. Good thesis statement Although overly divorced from reality, Blanche is ultimately a redeemable character because she strives to assert her sense of selfhood against an antagonistic male-dominated society. o Body Paragraphs Each body paragraph should focus on one main point that directly supports your thesis. Body paragraphs should have a three part structure Topic sentence Evidence Analysis/Explication o Integrating Sources
Using critical sources to build up your points: Quote a source to back up your point Quote a source and add on to its idea Use source to provide the historical or biographical context for the text you are writing about. Use a counter argument. Quote a critical opinion that you disagree with and explain to your reader why that critic is wrong....