Title | Financing Assignment |
---|---|
Course | Corporate Finance II |
Institution | University of Sydney |
Pages | 9 |
File Size | 337.9 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 61 |
Total Views | 161 |
Financing Assignment -86%...
FINANCINGASSIGNMENT
Table of Contents Executive summary..........................................................................................................................2 Cost of Capital Calculation................................................................................................................3 How does the observed data influence the estimation of a cost of capital?......................................4 Cost of Capital Calculation Methodology..........................................................................................4 Capital Transaction Recommendation..............................................................................................5 References........................................................................................................................................7
Executive summary Metcashshouldeitherinitiateanequityofferingatadiscountorinitiateasharerepurchaseplanto reduceitscostofcapital.AsharerepurchaseplanincreasestheweightingofMetcash’sdebtintheir capitalstructure,whichwouldreducetheirWACCinthelongrun.Offeringequityatadiscount createsasharedilution,whichwouldreduceMetcash’scostofequityandcostofcapitalintheshort runduetotheheavyweightofequityintheircapitalstructure.
Metcash Funding 4,000.00 3,500.00 3,000.00 2,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 1,000.00 500.00 0.00 2011 -500.00
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
-1,000.00 Marketvalueofequity
netdebt
RetainedEarnings
Figure 1
Overthelasttenyears,Metcash’sobserveddebtandequitylevelshaven’tpreciselyfollowedany capitalstructuretheory.However,thecapitalstructuretheorythatperhapsexplainstheobserved trendsisthe“Trade-offTheory. Modigliani–Miller’sfirstpropositionsuggeststhatintheadventofaperfectcapitalmarketwithno taxes,costs,andinformationsymmetry,afirm’scapitalstructuredoesnotaffectitsvalue,andas such,leveragedoesn’tprovideanyadvantagetoafirm.Metcash’soperationwithinan“imperfect “capitalmarketaccountsforthelackofcorrelationbetweenModigliani–Miller’sfirstpropositionand itsleveragedcapitalstructureobservedinfigure1.Inarevisionoftheirfirstproposition,toinclude taxesandtheassumptionofpermanentdebt,ModiglianiandMillerchampioneddebtasamore valuablefundingsourcethanequity.However,thelimittothebenefitofdebtasitincreasesisoneof manyfactorswhichaccountforMetcash’shistoricallackofdebtcomparedtoequitywith2014-2016 FYasanexception.Assuch,Metcash’scapitalstructuredoesn’trelatewithModigliani–Miller’s theorem. ThePeckingOrderHypothesisdevelopedbyMyerandMaljufstemsfromtheassumptionthe informationasymmetrybetweenfirmsandexternalinvestorstranslatesintohighercostsforfirms whenissuingexternalfinancing.Thus,thehypothesisstatesthatfirmsprefertofundinvestments internallyviaretainedearnings,andiftheyrequireexternalfunding,theyfirstchoosedebtandthen equityasalastresortduetothelowercostofdebt.AsdepictedbyFigure1,Metcashhasalways preferredtofunditsoperationsthroughexternalfinancing,especiallyequity.Thelackofcorrelation betweenthepeckingorderhypothesisandMetcash’scapitalstructureisemphasisedbyMetcash’s
preferencetoraise300millioninequityand180millionindebtfacilitiesoverutilisingretained profitstofundnewacquisitionsin2020.
AninnovationofModiglianiandMillers’proposition,thetrade-offtheoryimpliestheoptimalcapital structurehasamoderatedebtratiothatoffsetsthecostsofdebt(agency,financialdistress)withthe benefitsofdebtthefirm(taxshields)[CITATIONMye01\l3081].AsdepictedbyFigure1,Metcash’s debtwasmaintainedatamoderatelevelcomparedtoequityovertenyearsexceptduringthe20142016FYS.However,thehighdebt-to-equityratiosfrom2014-16canbeexplainedbyMetcash’sshare price,whichdecreasedfrom3.96in2013to2.78,1.32,1.76andsubsequentlyreducedthevalueof Metcash’sequityinconsecutiveyears.Thedropinsharepricewasaby-productofMetcash’s reducedprofitabilityduring2014-2016,createdbyMetcash’sheavyinvestmentina“transformation plan”in2014.Evenafterconsideringthehighdebttoequityratiooutliers,Metcashmaintainedanet gearingaveraging36.8%overtenyears,belowtheindustryaverageof63.4%.Thus,Metcash’s sustainabledebtstructuredrawsparallelstothetrade-offtheory.
Cost of Capital Calculation Table 1 2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
7.97%
6.74%
5.97%
5.95%
4.87%
4.85%
5.26%
5.36%
5.05%
4.14%
Cost of equity
8.80%
7.61%
6.57%
6.90%
6.35%
5.30%
5.51%
5.46%
5.24%
5.08%
Cost of debt
6.98%
5.80%
4.73%
4.53%
3.91%
3.67%
3.59%
3.68%
3.49%
2.73%
D/E
27%
32%
22%
34%
69%
19%
9%
3%
7%
42%
Beta
0.52
0.53
0.50
0.54
0.61
0.50
0.46
0.45
0.46
0.57
Risk free rate
5.7%
4.4%
3.54%
3.66%
2.71%
2.33%
2.73%
2.78%
2.5%
1.69%
Market risk premium
6%
6%
6%
6%
6%
6%
6%
6%
6%
6%
WACC
How does the observed data influence the estimation of a cost of capital? TwocrucialfactorsthatinfluenceMetcash’scostofcapitalaretheoverallweightandthecostsof debtandequitywithinafirm’scapitalstructure.AsshownbyFigure1andTable1,it’sclearthat Metcash’scapitalstructureisdominatedbyequityandMetcash’scostofequityismoreexpensive thantheircostofdebt.ThisdeterminesthataslightincreaseintheMetcashcostofequitycanbea keydriverinincreasingtheircostofcapitalwhichisshowninthe2016-2017FYs.Conversely,thecost ofdebtwillhavetoinflateconsiderablytomakeasimilarimpact,asshownin2017-2018FYs.An increaseinthecostofdebt,asseenin2018FY,usuallyresultsinareducedcostofcapital,butTable 1showsthatthecostofcapitalincreasesasthesheerweightingofequitydampenstheimpactofa firm’sdebtwhenestimatingthecostofcapital. OtherfactorsthatinfluencecapitalcostincludethefirmsBeta,therisk-freerate,andthefirm’s financialperformance. Thefirm’sBetaandtherisk-freeratesarecriticaldeterminantsofafirm’scostofequitywhen calculatedusingtheCAPMformula.ThisisshowninTable1,whereasignificantdecreaseintheriskfreeratecorrelateswithalowercostofequityandcostofcapital2011onwards.TheBetafluctuated between0.46-0.65between2011-2020.However,itsimpactonthecostofcapitalwasdampened duetothevolatilityoftherisk-freerate. TheAltmanZscore,whichassignscreditratingstoafirmwithnopubliclytradeddebt,isdependent onafirm’sfinancialperformance.Usually,afirm’ssubparfinancialperformanceleadstoalower creditrating,makingthefirmsriskierintheinvestor’seyesandincreasingitscostofdebt.However, asshownbyAPPENDIX1,thesubstantialreductionoftherisk-freeratefrom2011-2020have accountedforalowercostofdebt,despiteMetcash’ssubparfinancialperformanceassigningthema lowercreditratingduringthe2016-2019FYS.
Cost of Capital Calculation Methodology Themarketrateofreturn TheAllOrdinariesmarketindexcomprises500ofthebiggestcompanieslistedontheAustralian SecuritiesExchange(ASX),whichisthelargestamalgamationofsharesintheASX,makingtheindex themostaccuratesubstituteforthemarket. Risk-Freerate Therisk-freerateiscalculatedastheaveragerateofreturnofa“risk-free“Governmentbond”for thecalendaryear(Bishop,Carlton,&Pan,2018).Forexample,1.69%wasanappropriaterisk-free ratein2021 MarketRiskPremium
ResearchbymultipleacademicsourceshasdeterminedAustralia’sMarketriskpremiumis6% relativetotheten-yearGovernmentBondRate[CITATIONBis18\p19\l3081]. Beta Metcash’sβwascalculatedwiththeLeveredBetaformulabyutilisingWoolworth’sasaproxy. WoolworthsleveredBetawasunleveredandreleveredtocalculateMetcash’sBetafrom2011-2020. WoolworthsisanappropriateproxyforMetcashbecauseitoperatesinAustralia’sLiquorandretail divisionsandisthusexposedtosimilarriskfactorsfacedbyMetcash.Moreover,Woolworth’sstable historicalpriceissufficienttoestimateacompanyβaccurately. Costofequity TheCAPMformulawasusedtocalculatethecostofequity. Costofdebt ThecostofMetcash’sdebtwascalculatedusingtheAltmanZscore[CITATIONAlt94\l3081]and creditratingriskspreadsourcedfromtheRBA[CITATIONRes21\l3081]. DebttoEquityratio TheDebttoEquityratiowascalculatedastotaldebt/equity.ThebookvalueofMetcash’stotaldebt wasasubstituteforthemarketvalueofdebt.Metcash’smarketcapitalisationwasusedasthe Marketvalueofequity.
Capital Transaction Recommendation ThesourceoffundingthathasthemostsignificantimpactonMetcash’scostofcapitalisequity,as showninTable1.Thus,toreduceitscostofcapital,Metcashhastoreduceitscostofequity. Metcashshouldoffersharesatadiscountofitscurrentmarketpricetoexistingshareholdersand potentialinvestorstoreduceitscostofequity.Thiswouldreducethecostofequityastheincreased numberofsharesincirculationwouldreducethecurrentmarketvalueofMetcash’ssharesbasedon thelawsofsupplyanddemand.Thedividendcapitalisationmodelcalculatesthecostofequityby dividingthecompany’sdividendpershareratewiththecompany’scurrentmarketvalueofshares andsummingtheproductwiththedividendgrowthrate.Thus,ifMetcashmaintainsitscurrent dividendpayout,whichwassuggestedinthe2020annualreport,andkeepsitsdividendgrowth constant,implementingthiscapitaltransactionwillreduceitscostofequity[CITATIONMet20\l 3081].Metcashalsoincreasesitsconsiderableequitytovalueratiobyimplementingthis transaction,whichcanstifletheeffectsofanincreaseinthecostsofdebtandreduceitscostof capital,asdepictedinTable1. Thepotentialrisksofthistransactionarethatpotentialinvestorswillinterprettheequityofferingas asignofbusinesstroublewhilstexistingshareholderswillbeunhappythatnewshareholdersmay undercuttheircapitalgains. However,theprospectsoffutureinvestorsacquiringdiscountedequityisincrediblylikely,basedon thelemonprinciple.Thelemonprinciplestatesthatinvestorswillbemorelikelytopurchasenew equityifofferedatadiscountpriceasinvestorsareuncertainoftheactualvalueofacompanydue totheinformationasymmetrypresentincapitaltransactions[CITATIONMye01\l3081].Moreover, Metcashachievedstrongfinancialresultsattheendofthe2020FY,withsalesincreasingby20%,
encouragingexternalinvestorstoinvestinMetcashatadiscountduetotheexcellentprofit potential[CITATIONMet21\l3081]. Despitebeingundercutbythiscapitaltransaction,existingshareholderswillstillbewillingtoinvest inthistransaction.Metcashissettomaintainaconstantdividendin2021[CITATIONMet20\l 3081],thusincreasingexistingshareholders’dividendpayoutiftheypurchasethenewshares, marginallyoffsettingthelossofvalueabsorbedbytheshareholderswiththeissueofdiscounted equity.Moreover,accordingtoMorningstar,existingshareholderswerewillingtopurchasesharesat $2.28inMay2020,whenthemarketpricewas$2.50duetoMetcash’sgrowthin2019[CITATION Dat21\l3081].ThecontinuedincreaseinMetcashprofitabilityreportedin2020intheirfinancial resultswillencourageexistingshareholderstopurchasethenewequityagain[CITATIONMet21\l 3081]. ThiscapitaltransactionisjustifiedbyadecreaseinMetcash’scostofequityfrom(5.24)to(5.08) during2019-2020afterMetcashimplementedashareissuein2020. Asharebuybackiswhenapubliclylistedcompanyusescashtopurchaseitssharesbackfromthe market.InthecontextofMetcash,theyshouldinitiateasharebuybacktoincreasedebtasa percentageofthetotalcapitalstructureandreducetheirWACC. Implementingasharebuybackreducesthesizeofequity,resultingintheequity-to-totalassets decreasingandthedebt-to-totalassetsincreasing;figuresusedasweightstodeterminetheWACC. Inthelongrun,ifthecostofdebthasamoresignificantimpactindeterminingthecostofcapital andifthecostofequityiskeptrelativelyconstantwithoutinflatingmassively,whichisobservedin Table1,asharebuybackleadstoalowerWACC.Asempiricalresearchandgeneralfinancial standardshavedetermined,thecostofafirm’sdebtisgenerallylowerthanequity,whichisthecase withMetcash,asshowninTable1. Potentialrisksofthisstrategyarethenegativeimplicationsofincreasedleverage.However,Metcash isuniquelypositionedtodealwiththeriskasMetcash’sinterestcoverratioin2010wasextremely strongat9.6[CITATIONDat21\l3081],whichwasinflatedbyimpressivesalesgrowththat amplifiedMetcash’sEBDITAinthesameperiodasreportedinMetcash’s2021interimfinancial results[CITATIONMet21\l3081].ThisportraysMetcashashavingastrongmarginofsafetywhen dealingwiththerisksofthistransaction. ThistransactionwillbeeffectiveasafterMetcashpurchased66,385,128ordinarysharesin2018 [CITATIONDat21\l3081],theircostofcapitalreducedfrom5.36to5.06accordingly.
References Altman,E.I.(1994).TheUseofCreditScoringModels.Stern School of Business,9. Bishop,S.,Carlton,T.,&Pan,T.(2018).Market Risk Premium.MacquarieUniversity,Departmentof AppliedFinance. Datanalysis via Morningstar. (2021). Retrieved from Morningstar: https://datanalysis-morningstarcom-au.ezproxy.library.sydney.edu.au/ftl/company/ratio?xtmlicensee=datpremium&ASXCode=MTS&sy=2011-01-01&ey=2021-12-31&rt=A Metcash. (2020). Metcash Annual report. Retrieved from Metcash: https://mars-metcdncom.global.ssl.fastly.net/content/uploads/sites/101/2020/08/05171507/Metcash-AnnualReport-2020.pdf Metcash. (2021). Metcash Financial results. Retrieved from Metcash: https://mars-metcdncom.global.ssl.fastly.net/content/uploads/sites/101/2020/12/07095220/2152667.pdf Myers,S.C.(2001).CapitalStructure.Journal of Economic Perspectives,82. Reserve Bank of Australia. (2021). Statistical Tables. Retrieved from Reserve Bank of Australia: https://www.rba.gov.au/statistics/tables/#interest-rates
APPENDIX APPENDIX 1 - Cost of Debt
APPENDIX 2-WACC Calculation...