Flood Disaster Risk Reduction and Risk Management of Pasig City Survey Questionnaire PDF

Preview

Summary

FLOOD DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND RISK MANAGEMENT OF PASIG CITY SURVEY QUESTIONAIRE Part I: Demographic Profile (Background of Respondent[s]) Direction: Please put a check (/) mark on the space provided that fits your profile or provide data on the space provided as indicated. Name:_________________...

Description

Accelerat ing t he world's research.

Flood Disaster Risk Reduction and Risk Management of Pasig City Survey Questionnaire Robert John Robas

Related papers

Download a PDF Pack of t he best relat ed papers 

Flood Disat er Risk Reduct ion and Risk Management of Pasig Cit y Robert John Robas Effect iveness of Risk Reduct ion Management in Select ed Brgy.'s in Met ro Manila glenn mark Tabang Designing a Disast er Resilient Cit y: A St udy of t he Inst it ut ionalizat ion Process of t he Marikina Cit y Dis… Carla Edit h G. Jimena, Ron Jay Dangcalan

FLOOD DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND RISK MANAGEMENT OF PASIG CITY SURVEY QUESTIONAIRE Part I: Demographic Profile (Background of Respondent[s]) Direction: Please put a check (/) mark on the space provided that fits your profile or provide data on the space provided as indicated. Name:_______________________________________________ (Optional) Barangay:____________________________________________ 1. Demographic profiles of local government units respond to disasters? 1.1. Age

1.2. Gender

( ( ( (

) 18-25 years old ) 26-30 years old ) 31-35 years old ) Male

( ( ( (

) 36-40 years old ) 41-45 years old ) 46 yrs old and above ) Female

1.3. Government Affiliation

( ) Barangay ( ) City Hall Employees ( ) Barangay Disaster Coordinating Council ( ) Others, please specify:__________________________

1.4. Position Held

( ) Chairman ( ) Councilor ( ) Department Head ( ) Committee Member ( ) Others, please specify:__________________________

1.5. Length of Service

( ) 3 years & below ( ) 4-7 years ( ) 8-11 years

( ) 12 years & above

Part II. Questions on aspects of Flood Disaster Risk Management-Disaster Risk Reduction (DRMDRR) Direction: Kindly provide applicable answers to the space provided after each statement or place a check mark on the box provided as stated. 2. Over all evaluation of Flood Disaster Risk Management- Disaster Risk Reduction (DRM-DRR) program of Pasig City on the following? 5- Very effective 4- Effective 3- Moderately Effective 2-Slightly Effective 1-Not Effective Area of Concern 5 4 3 2 Prevention and Mitigation Emergency Preparedness and risk reduction Emergency Response Rehabilitation and recovery

1

3. What are the problems encountered in the implementation of the flood Disaster Risk ManagementDisaster Risk reduction (DRM-DRR) program? 5- Strongly Agree 2- Disagree

4- Agree 3- Moderately Agree 1- Strongly disagree

ROBAS, Robert John O. Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration

Rizal Technological University, 2013

Page 1 of 6

Area of Concern

5

4

3

2

1

Budget Political will (Leadership of Officials) Awareness thru education & information Community participation Community resistance (community are continuously refusing to changes and program implemented by government) Lack of disaster management plan Manpower Delayed implementation of project Poor implementation of law Insufficient assistance from National Government Lack of coordination between LGU, NGO,NG & other agency Others, if any please specify

4. What does the flood disaster risk reduction and management program need in terms of the following?: 4.1. Program objectives. Based on your experience, how effective the City’s current Disaster Risk Management-Disaster Risk Reduction program attain its stated goals? (Note: The objectives used are adopted from Pasig City Flood Plan of 2012) 5- Very effective 4- Effective 3- Moderately Effective 2- Slightly Effective 1- Not Effective Area of Concern 5 4 3 Save lives of people at risk? Reduce immediate threats to life, public health and safety, and public private property? Provide necessary care, shelter, and medical services to Pasig City residents and other members of the general public? Restore the operations of facilities, whether public or privately owned for health, safety, and welfare of community (e.g. Hospital, utilities, transportation)? Assess damage to infrastructure, public facilities, and the built environment and needs? Expedite the restoration of services, the economy, and the community at large; and begin the process of recovery? Keep the public information Others, if any please specify

2

1

4.2. Program resources 4.2.1. What is the level of responsiveness of staff/personnel for Disaster Risk ManagementDisaster Risk Reduction of Pasig City? (Note: The criterion used was adopted from Pasig City Flood Plan of 2012) ROBAS, Robert John O. Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration

Rizal Technological University, 2013

Page 2 of 6

5- Very Responsive 4- Responsive 3- Moderately Responsive 2- Slightly Responsive 1- Not Responsive Area of Concern Transportation Personnel Communication Personnel Public Works and Engineering Personnel Fire fighting Personnel Emergency management & information management Mass care, Housing and human services personnel Resource Support Personnel Public Health and Medical Services Personnel Urban Search and Rescue Personnel Hazardous materials Response personnel Natural Resources Personnel Public safety and Security personnel Recovery management task force Relief Volunteers Disaster Management trainers Logistics Officer Experts (i.e., Forecasting specialists, surveyors, slope stability experts) Others, please specify

5

4

3

2

1

4.2.2. How sufficient are the physical resources for emergency response in a disaster situation? 5-Very Sufficient 2- Slightly Sufficient Area of Concern Life Savings jacket Life saving buoys Rescue boat Search light Water proof battery Generators Diving Suit Ambulance Vehicles (Transportation) Early warning device Portable toilets Evacuation Area Fire alarm system Telephone Services Health facilities Others, if any please specify

4- Sufficient 1- Not Sufficient 5

ROBAS, Robert John O. Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration

Rizal Technological University, 2013

3- Moderately Sufficient

4

3

2

1

Page 3 of 6

4.2.3. How sufficient are the funding for flood DRR-DRM programs to minimize impacts and increase capacity building in pre, actual and post disaster recovery processes? 5-Very Sufficient 2- Slightly Sufficient

4- Sufficient 3- Moderately Sufficient 1- Not Sufficient

Area of Concern Prevention and Mitigation Emergency Preparedness and risk reduction Emergency Response Rehabilitation and recovery

5

4

3

2

1

4.3. Program activities 4.3.1. Prevention and Mitigation. Based on your experiences on the pas disaster, what Disaster Risk Management-Disaster Risk Reduction (DRM-DRR) plans are needed for your areas? 5- Strongly Agree 2- Disagree

4- Agree 3- Moderately Agree 1- Strongly disagree

Area of Concern Hazard Mapping and urban planning Education and Awareness Sufficient shelter food & cloths Antibiotics and medical kits Transportation to help the effected people Community involvement and participation Infrastructure Declogging of water ways and canals Dredging of rivers Early warning mechanism Others, if any please specify

5

4

3

2

1

4.3.2. Emergency preparedness and risk reduction. What is the level of responsiveness of Flood DRR-DRM program for disaster risk factors at the community level? 5- Very Responsive 4- Responsive 3- Moderately Responsive 2- Slightly Responsive 1- Not Responsive

Area of Concern

5

4

3

2

1

The communities that organize themselves to monitor potential disaster The warning systems in place to the community level? The communities understand official warning and react? The community vulnerable have evacuation ROBAS, Robert John O. Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration

Rizal Technological University, 2013

Page 4 of 6

plans/maps? The training, simulation exercise, or local drills conducted, at the community level? The training conducted at the community level? The disaster awareness and public information projects or programmes being undertaken to the community? 4.3.3. Emergency Response. Based on your experience, what is the extent of responsiveness of plan for life preservation and supply of the basic needs of affected population during the actual and immediately after the disaster occurrence? 5- Very Responsive 4- Responsive 3- Moderately Responsive 2- Slightly Responsive 1- Not Responsive Area of Concern Relief operation Search and rescue Dissemination/Information sharing of disaster related information Development/provision of temporary shelter Health service Psycho social support Early recovery mechanism Management of dead and missing Evacuation management Social protection intervention Civil & uniformed services coordination

5

4

3

2

1

4.3.4. Rehabilitation and recovery. How efficient was the government action taken to restore and improved the living conditions of the affected residents? 5- Very Efficient 2- Slightly Efficient

4- Efficient 1- Not Efficient

Area of Concern Livelihood for affected victims Search and retrieval Shelter/Relocation for affected victims Psycho Social Counseling Infrastructure and Relocation plan Post disaster need assessment Environmental Protection Others, please specify

ROBAS, Robert John O. Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration

Rizal Technological University, 2013

5

3- Moderately Efficient

4

3

2

1

Page 5 of 6

Part III. Recommendation Direction: Please indicate your answer to the space provided correspond to the question.

5. What realistic changes can be made in your existing disaster program so as to make it even more effective? _____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________

ROBAS, Robert John O. Survey Questionnaire for Master’s Thesis in Public Administration

Rizal Technological University, 2013

Page 6 of 6...