Group Pitch Rubric- Design Thinking PDF

Preview

Summary

The Group Pitch Rubric of Design Thinking...

Description

MPU3253 Design Thinking Group Pitch Rubric Date: Group: Session:

_________________________ ________________________ _______________________

Judge: Group Leader: Design Challenge:

TOTAL MARKS FOR THIS GROUP

_________________________________ ___ ___ _____Poverty and hunger issue________

Criteria

76 - 100

51 - 75

26 - 50

0 - 25

Problem Statement & Market Validation (20%)

Clear description of problem and explanation of how this problem affects user/society.

Somewhat clear description of problem and explanation of how this problem affects user/society.

Unclear description of problem or explanation of how this problem affects user/society.

No description of problem or explanation of how this problem affects user/society.

Solution (20%)

Unique, clear, detailed description of product/app/ services/concept and explanation of its ability to solve identified problems.

Somewhat fair, clear description of product/app/ services/concept and explanation of its ability to solve identified problems.

Unclear description of product/app/ services/concept or explanation of its ability to solve identified problems.

No description of product/app /services/concept or explanation of its ability to solve identified problems.

Impact & Scale up potential (20%)

Clear, detailed description of how solution would impact user/society.

Somewhat clear description of how solution would impact user/society.

Unclear description of how solution would impact user/society.

No description of how solution would impact user/society.

Comments

Marks

Please turn over

Page 1 of 2

76 - 100

51 - 75

26 - 50

Quality of Delivery (15%)

Criteria

Extremely comfortable and confident with excellent use of gestures, eye contact, vivid language, and voice.

Fairly comfortable delivery with adequate use gestures and eye contact with some variation in language and voice.

Apparent nervousness/uneasiness with few gestures and little eye contact with some oral filers and nonverbal distractions

Poor delivery with no gestures/eye contact, monotone voice, insufficient volume, abundant oral fillers, and nonverbal distractions.

0 - 25

Team Dynamics (10%)

All the members were well prepared and contributed in the pitching session. Strong teamwork was portrayed during the Q&A session.

More than half of the members contributed in the pitching session. More than half of the members showed teamwork during the Q&A session.

Less than half of the members contributed in the pitching session. Not much teamwork showed during the Q&A session.

Only one member from the team contributed in the pitching session. Hardly any teamwork showed during the Q&A session.

Q&A (15%)

Shows full knowledge of the project. Questions are answered clearly.

Shows adequate knowledge of the project. Questions are answered

Shows minimal knowledge of the project. Some questions are answered.

Shows very minimal knowledge of the project. Unable to answer questions.

Comments

Marks

Note to judges: Please add up total points for the 6 criteria and write it on the top right corner of Page 1

Page 2 of 2...