Title | Hess\'s Law Lab Report |
---|---|
Author | Lea Marrs |
Course | College Chemistry I Lab |
Institution | Wake Forest University |
Pages | 7 |
File Size | 215.5 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 11 |
Total Views | 145 |
lab report on Hess's Law ...
Thermodynamics and Calorimetry
Objective: The purpose of the lab is to combine two reactants in the calorimeter and measure the heats of reaction in solution, eventually allowing an individual to prove or disprove Hess’s law.
Introduction: Thermodynamics is the study of energy exchanged between the system and the surroundings. The heat of a reaction, change in enthalpy, or ΔH refer to the energy transferred from the surroundings in the form of heat in the course of a reaction occurring at constant pressure. If ΔH is greater than zero, the reaction is referred to as being endothermic, which mean heat is taken from the surrounding and the surroundings get colder. If ΔH is less than zero, the reaction is exothermic, meaning that heat is released, and the surroundings get warmer. Another important aspect of this experiment is that an object’s or solution’s temperature will rise in proportion to how much heat it has absorbed. The increase in temp that is directly proportional to the amount of heat absorbed is considered the constant of heat capacity. Therefore, the larger the heat capacity of the object, the smaller the temperature rise will be. The lab is a calorimetry experiment which measures the heat transfer associated with a process. A calorimeter is a device used to measure the heat of a reaction. For this lab, Styrofoam cups work because they are insulated, which prevents heat exchange within the environment. After determining the changes in temperature in reactions, it is evident that the total quantity of energy remains constant. Using Hess’s law, which states that change in enthalpy for a stepwise process is the sum of the enthalpy
changes of the steps, if the reaction is changed, ΔH reflects those changes, it is clear that the law of conservation of energy is applicable.
qrxn=m× C × ∆ T
KO H (aq )+ H Cl(aq ) → KCl( aq ) +H 2 O(l) ∆ H 1 -56.96 KOH ( s) → KOH ( aq ) ∆ H 2 -55.29 KOH ( s) + H Cl (aq ) → KCl(aq )+ H 2 O(l ) ∆ H 3 -112.25
ΔH1+ ΔH2= ΔH3
Methods: For the first week, set up a calorimeter from two Styrofoam coffee cups, one inside of the other one. Put a lid on the calorimeter and push a temperature probe through the lid hole. Calibrate the probe with a thermometer. Put 25.0mL of room temperature water in the calorimeter, then 75.0mL of ~40oC water in the other Styrofoam cup. Record the temperatures and the combine them in the calorimeter. Use the thermometer in the warm water, and the temperature probe in the calorimeter. Pour the warm water into the calorimeter then put the lid on and stir. Once the temperature stops increasing, the final temperature has been reached. Repeat the procedure twice. The second experiment includes the same process, but with 50 mL of 2 M HCl (aq) and 50 mL of 2M KOH. The third reaction is between HCl and KOH, which involves reacting 100 mL of 1M HCl with around 4 g KOH pellets. To determine the amount of heat that was produced, multiply the change in temperature by the sum of the heat capacity of the final solution and the Calorimetry
constant. The last reaction during the second week, set up the calorimeter and calibrate the temperature probe like the first week. The reactants are 100 mL of distilled water and 4 g KOH. Repeat both procedures twice and find the average values for each reaction.
Results and Discussion:
Table 1. First Calorimetry Experiment
Initial Temperature of the “cold” water – 25mL
21.8°C
Initial Temperature of the “hot” water – 75mL
43°C
Temperature after the waters mixed
31.7°C
Temperature change of the “hot” water
37.1°C – 43°C = - 5.9°C
Temperature change of the “cold” water
37.1°C – 21.8°C = 15.3°C
Q (heat) of the ‘hot” water
-1851.42 J
Q (heat) of the “cold” water
1600.38 J
Q of the calorimetry
16.41 J/°C
Table 2. Second Calorimetry Experiment
Initial Temperature of the KOH 1.55M – 50mL 22.1°C
Initial Temperature of the HCl 2M – 50mL
22.1°C
Temperature after the substances were mixed
33.2°C
Qcal
4.826 kJ
Qrxn
-4.826 kJ
Number of moles
0.0755 mol
ΔH
-62.3 J/mol
Week 1: q hot : (75 g ) × ( 4.184 J / g ∙℃ ) × ( 37.1℃−43 ℃ )=−1851.42 q cold : ( 25 g ) × ( 4.184 J / g ∙℃ ) × (37.1 ℃−21.8 ℃) =1600.38
Heat capacity of calorimeter (Ccal): J J +(4.184 J /g ∙ ℃ ) ∙100 g=434.81 16.41 ℃ ℃
Table 3. Second week Calorimetry values
Trial Number Which ΔH
Mass of KOH Change in Temp ΔH Value
1
ΔH
3
4.053 g
18.78°C
-113.046 kJ
2
ΔH
3
4.003 g
17.92°C
-109.218 kJ
3
ΔH
2
4.044 g
10.15°C
-61.234 kJ
4
ΔH
2
4.038 g
8.57°C
-51.779 kJ
Week 2: 434.81 J /℃ × ∆ T ¿ mol
J ×18.78 ℃ ℃ =−113.046 kJ 1 mol 4.053 g × 56.11 g
434.81 trial1 :
J ×17.92 ℃ ℃ =−109.22 kJ 1 mol 4.003 g × 56.11 g
434.81 trial2 :
J ×10.15 ℃ ℃ =−61.23 kJ 1 mol 4.044 × 56.11 g
434.81 trial3 :
J ×8.57 ℃ ℃ trial 4 : =−51.78 kJ 1 mol 4.038 g × 56.11 g 434.81
H2O and KOH heat of reaction 30
Temperature (C)
25 20 15 10 5 0 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Time (seconds)
Figure 1. Graph of change of heat in reaction between water and KOH, which displays the heat of the reaction.
HCl and KOH Heat of Neutralization 20.5 20
Temperature (C)
19.5 19 18.5 18 17.5 17 16.5 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Time (seconds)
Figure 2. Graph of change of heat in reaction between HCl and KOH, which displays the heat of neutralization.
Conclusion: ¿−111.132 kJ −(−112.25 kJ ) ∨
¿ ×100=0.99 % −112.25 kJ
% error :¿
In order to ensure that all of the heat goes into a medium with a known heat capacity, it is important to keep the heat from leaving the calorimeter. As well, it is essential to know the heat capacity of the calorimeter and the solutions in it. At the end, when the solution in the calorimeter is well-mixed, the reaction is complete. Throughout the reaction, if the mixture is not stirred fast enough, the resulting line is not vertical, meaning the transition will be faster if NaOH is added rapidly and stirred well, which leaves a nearly vertical temp. rise. After the rise, the reaction is complete. If the temperature probe is not placed into the calorimeter fast enough, it will result in an incorrect initial temperature, varying the change in temperature in the reaction. Since the ΔH for the reactions is negative, there is a release in energy. The graph scale should be 1 Hz instead of 10 Hz in order to accurately demonstrate the release in heat. Overall, the ΔH of the reactions should mirror the values of Hess’s Law....