Title | Intro Macro - Week 4 Keynesian Model Notes |
---|---|
Course | Introductory Macroeconomics |
Institution | University of Melbourne |
Pages | 19 |
File Size | 1.7 MB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 112 |
Total Views | 312 |
INTRO MACROWEEK 4 – Keynesian ModelTEXTBOOK NOTESCh7 Spending and output in the shortrun7 Introduction to the Keynesian Model John Maynard Keynes proposed the idea that aggregate spending may cause output to fall below potential output Government policies that affect the level of spending can be u...
INTRO MACRO WEEK 4 – Keynesian Model TEXTBOOK NOTES Ch7 Spending and output in the short run 7.1 Introduction to the Keynesian Model
John Maynard Keynes proposed the idea that aggregate spending may cause output to fall below potential output
Government policies that affect the level of spending can be used to eliminate output gaps (stabilisation policies e.g. fiscal policy)
Keynesian model only applies in the short-run - where firms don't adjust their prices, but instead meet the demand forthcoming at pre-set prices o As prices are fixed, this model doesn't account for inflation
This assumption (that firms vary production to meet demand at fixed prices) implies spending will have powerful effects on a nation's GDP
Firms don’t change their prices frequently because of menu costs
Decision involves a cost-benefit comparison: does the benefit of changing prices outweigh menu costs? (The benefit being whether sales will be brought more in line with normal production capacity)
As this model is in the short-run, there is no distinction between real and nominal variables like GDP o Since prices don't change, any changes in real variables will impact nominal variables
7.2 Aggregate expenditure
Output at each point in time in the economy depends on planned aggregate expenditure - the total planned spending on final goods and services
Aggregate expenditure = C + I + G + NX
Planned versus actual expenditure
Planned spending can differ from actual spending - a firm can sell less or more of its products than intended
Unsold inventory are treated as an investment
Denote IP as planned investment, and I as actual investment
A firm that sells less of its output than planned will add more to its inventory than planned have I > IP
A firm that sells more than expected will add less to its inventory, and have I < IP
Actual and planned investment may differ for firms - but for households and the government not so much, Therefore, we can define planned aggregate expenditure as:
Consumer spending and the economy
An important determinant of the amount people plan to consume is there after-tax, or disposable income
Disposable income (of private sector) = total production of the economy, Y, less net taxes (T), so (Y - T)
We can assume that consumption spending (C) increases as (Y - T) increases
CONSUMPTION FUNCTION: Link between consumption and disposable income for private sector:
Wealth effect = changes in asset prices that affect households' wealth and spending on consumption goods
Marginal propensity to consume (MPC) = the c parameter in the above equation, the amount by which consumption rises when current disposable income rises by one dollar o c is a proportion between 0 and 1 (0 < c < 1) o Slope of the consumption function
7.3 Planned aggregate expenditure and output
In the above example, 960 is the exogenous expenditure (doesn't depend on output)
The induced expenditure is 0.8Y (depends on output)
* 7.4 Short-run equilibrium output How is output determined?
During the short-run period, firms produce an amount that is equal to planned aggregate expenditure
Short-run equilibrium output = the level of output where output Y equals planned aggregate expenditure PAE
Y = PAE
Injections = the component of PAE that doesn't come from households consumption expenditure (INJP), all sources of exogenous expenditure in the economy
Consists of investment expenditures, gov. expenditure and expenditure by foreign residents on domestic exports
Withdrawals = that part of income NOT spend on goods and services produced domestically, NOT used for consumption purposes
Includes saving, tax payments, expenditure on imports (W = S + T + M)
o
How does the above equation relate to the equilibrium of Y = PAE?
Recall that PAE = C + IP + G + NX
In equilibrium, it must be that Y = C + IP + G + NX
Subtracting C from both sides, we get Y - C = IP + G + NX
Recall from earlier chapters that private saving S = Y C-T
Therefore, Y - C = S + T, and S + T = I P + G + NX
Remembering that net exports NX represents exports (X) less imports (M),
We can rewrite as S
Left hand side of the above equation is withdrawals (leakages), right hand side is injections Equilibrium of Y = PAE is the same as the equilibrium of withdrawals and planned injections
+ T + M = IP + G + X
DISEQUILIBRIUM: suppose PAE > Y
This means C + IP + G + NX > Y, and IP + G + NX > S + T + M, so planned injections would exceed withdrawals
We would expect aggregate output to grow to match the level of PAE
This growth is triggered by an unexpected depletion of firm's inventories
PAE > Y --> tells us that firms hadn't made their investment plans based on having to meet this high level of PAE
Firms would have to run down their inventories in order to meet demand, and eventually boost production
DISEQUILIBRIUM: now suppose PAE < Y
This implies INJP < W
Leads to contraction in the economy - firms will have an unplanned increase in inventories, and are unable to sell all that is produced
Firms will cut back on production - aggregate output shrinks
7.5 Consumption and investment in the 2-sector model
Two-sector model = imagine economy consists of only households and firms
Household's aggregate income corresponds to economy's total GDP - no taxes to be paid
Consumption function:
o
In a two-sector model, S = Y - C, so the saving function is S = Y - (Cbar + cY), or:
Vertical intercept of the saving function is negative of the exogenous component of consumption (the intercept of consumption function)
In the event aggregate income were 0, there would only be exogenous consumption Cbar The funds to finance this would come from reducing savings (the negative sign)
Saving is the only withdrawal in the 2 sector model
Planned investment is the only source of planned injections
Treats planned investment as exogenous - it doesn't change when GDP/output changes!!! The rationale is the fact that other factors influence investment plans more, which are real interest rate and entrepreneur's expectations
o
Entrepreneur's expectations = expectations held by decision-makers in firms about the future profitability of proposed investment projects
7.6 The 45-degree diagram
The 45-degree line represents all the possible points where the economy's equilibrium condition is satisfied
Planned spending by households can be represented with consumption function
Firms' spending plans are investments - which we have assumed to be exogenous
PAE is the sum of household's consumption spending and firm's planned investment spending
The point at which the PAE line crosses the 45-degree line marks the economy's equilibrium given the current spending plans of households and firms
At that point, the spending plans of households and firms match the economy's actual level of production
7.7 Withdrawals and injections
Planned injections = withdrawals when the economy's saving function intersects economy's planned investment function
DISEQUILIBRIUM where withdrawals > injections, PAE < Y
Recall that withdrawals are the part of income NOT spent on consumption
7.8 The Four-Sector Model
PAE = C + IP + G + NX
Some more assumptions need to be made:
Net taxes consist of an exogenous component (Tbar) that is unrelated to income, and another component proportional to income. t = tax rate o Consumption depends on after-tax income o
Imports are proportional to income (M = mY)
1. Planned investment, gov expenditure and exports are ALL exogenous - they don't vary when income varies
1. Withdrawals consist of saving, tax and spending on imports Total withdrawals increase if GDP increases - each component increases in line with aggregate income 1. Planned injections are firms' planned investment, gov. expenditure and exports All are assumed to be exogenous
Economy's interpretation of the equilibrium stays the same!! Planned aggregate spending still = aggregate output Withdrawals still equal planned injections
7.9 Example: Planned spending and the output gap
Moral of the story: decline in exogenous expenditure leads to contractionary output gap!!!
Equilibrium level of GDP is below the economy's potential level
7.10 The Multiplier
Decline in government spending leads to a much greater fall in output
Fall in consumer spending not only reduces sales of consumer goods, it also reduces incomes of workers and owners in industries that produce the goods
As their incomes fall, these workers reduce their spending, which reduces the output and income of other producers ---> MULTIPLIER
Successive rounds of declines in spending and income leads to an ultimate decrease in PAE
Income-expenditure multiplier: effect of a one-unit increase in exogenous expenditure on short-run equilibrium output
INTUITION BEHIND THE MULTIPLIER:
Small change in exogenous expenditure leads to a larger change in output Intuition: exogenous change in expenditure becomes income for others Keynesian consumption function: increase in income is partly saved and partly consumed (disposable income) Increase in consumption further increases national income --> further increases expenditure
Applies to any number x greater than 0 but less than 1
E.g. if x = 0.8, the spending on domestically produced goods and services that takes place in each round is 0.8 times the spending from the previous round
Multiplier for basic Keynesian model
Let k = c(1 - t) - m be the coefficient in front of Y in the 4sector model equation for PAE
K = marginal propensity of expenditure on domestically produced goods and services
Multiplier for a four-sector model = 1−k
Multiplier for a two-sector model = 1−c
Note that: k is heavily influenced by c
If marginal propensity to CONSUME is large, then falls in income will reduce people's spending largely, and the multiplier effect will be large Increase in marginal propensity to SAVE would lead to less consumption for any increase in income (reduced multiplier effect)
Multiplier will be smaller the higher the tax rate ---> if the tax rate is high, a change in domestic income won't flow through to expenditure as much
Propensity to import increased ---> multiplier will decrease, because a smaller proportion of disposable income will be spent on domestic goods/services
1
1...