Title | Lecture 07 - With Professor Darcy Kelley |
---|---|
Course | TOPICS-NEUROBIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR |
Institution | Columbia University in the City of New York |
Pages | 2 |
File Size | 59.4 KB |
File Type | |
Total Downloads | 103 |
Total Views | 143 |
With Professor Darcy Kelley...
Retina develops from the neural plate: minibrain Photoreceptor: 1' sensory neuron What is a receptive field? o Visual pathway Receptive field structures: RGC, LGN, V1 o Lateral geniculate nucleus - has 6 layers; switches organization right/lef o V1: has ocular dominance columns (if you go from pial -> ventricular surface, all of those cells are driven by one eye rather than the other; if you occlude one eye, the other one takes over) Visual info from photoreceptor to RGC; bipolar (two types: on/off; account for shape of receptive field of retinal ganglion cells; project to on/off retinal ganglion cells), horizontal (lateral inhibition, sharpens contrast), amacrine (starburst amacrine cells seem to be specialized [based on dendrites] for detection of motion) o RGCs tile the retina, starburst amacrine cells shingle the retina (dendritic fields overlap) Can tell where you are in the visual system using cytoarchitectonics, cortical layers Cortical organization is columnar o Chart with five neuron types, go listen to lecture again Fovea only has cones (most densely packed place in retina; highest visual acuity) Magnification factor - higher amount of neurons ____listen to lecture again__ A visuotopic map (Tootell et al, 1988) o A striped stimulus provided to eye; pulled out a part of the visual cortex; did it over and over again to change metabolism of synaptic recipient regions to upregulate production of cytochrome oxidase; Magnification factor (?) Molecules that respond to neural activity: o 2-deoxyglucose, cytochrome oxidase Look at fig 25-11 Both start out in 1' visual cortex, then they diverge (example of parallel processing) o Ventral pathway (responsible for complicated visual fields): 1' visual cortex -> inferotemporal cortex (face cell patches here respond to faces) Inferotemporal cortex also gets input from other parts of brain How do you get a complicated receptive field? (Fig 27-10) o If you have a bunch of cells with a simpler receptive field, and they provide subthreshold input to a recipient cell, you can arrange things so that the cells only give input when visual stuff is summed o Have to have all of those receptor fields converging onto a post-synaptic cell o Many systems require convergence for specificity, but info also diverges - a single RGC provides info to a large number of circuits w/in the visual pathway that do diff things Fig 28-13 o Have complicated receptor fields in V1 (right side, horse + circus tent); have lower level stuff on right that converges/consolidates in medial temporal lobe Fig 28-5 o Object invariance - orientation of object d/n matter, can still recognize it from a different view (e.g. identifying someone from the back of their head) o Also asked if it matter whether it has color or not; found it usually doesn't matter
o Are there cells that identify an object as a unique object (e.g., your grandmother)? Fig 28-3 o Apperceptive agnosia - cannot see object parts as a unified whole o Associative agnosia - cannot interpret, understand, or assign meaning to objects Object blindness - cannot see an object in its entirety (can still see faces) Prosopagnosia can be acquired or developmental (birth) Fig 28-2: Proposed neural system for object recognition system o System invokes both dorsal and ventral streams; has a memory component in brain that involves hippocampus, ER, etc. Freedman and Miller o What features are necessary to recognize cat vs dog o If you visually morph cats/dogs, what makes you recognize them as cat/dog? Record and ask whether brain response is same or different Presumably input from TC -> lateral PFC accounts for some of it Fig 28-4 o Put electrodes in inferior temporal cortex, create peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) o Only thing that will drive the neurons are faces (monkey/human), won't be activated by hands or scrambled faces (2) o If you can reconstruct the object from the firing pattern of the neuron, that's the HG test Fig 28-6 o Recording in ITC; there were neurons here highly selective for faces (face cell patches) o Did this with microelectrodes originally, then fMRI (yellow parts are face cell patches) o Face cell patches respond to different aspects of faces; all interconnected; if you stimulate PL, you'll see activity in other face areas Tanaka 2003 o Does it have object invariance? Can get same activation of face cell whether you're looking from side or from front PAPER: The Code for Facial Identity in the Primate Brain o Started with a library of 200 faces, wanted to pull out info about shape of face and appearance (what is lef afer you normalize for shape) Everyone's face shape is the same, so only thing lef is appearance o Use shape and appearance to map receptive field of face neuron o Principle component analysis: unbiased way to tell you what things in the data set matter (appearance? shape?) Once they separated out shape, also separated out appearance (e.g., do you have bags under your eyes) o Single cells are tuned to single face axes and are blind to changes orthogonal to this axis o Using this axis model, they could predict neural firing pattern and could also read out the neural firing pattern and reconstruct the face (via PCA info) o Face patches ML/MF and AM carry complementary information about faces...