Lecture 2.1 - Moodle - equity and trust PDF

Title Lecture 2.1 - Moodle - equity and trust
Course Equity and Trusts
Institution University of Essex
Pages 4
File Size 83 KB
File Type PDF
Total Downloads 47
Total Views 157

Summary

equity and trust...


Description

1/28/21

1

Week 17

2

3

CERTAINTY

4

CERTAINTY • Knight v Knight (1840) 3 Beav 148 (Lord Langdale):

Ø “...the words were so used, that upon the whole, they ought to be construed as imperative.” Ø Ø “...the subject of the recommendation or wish be certain.” Ø Ø “the objects or persons intended to have the benefit...be also certain.”

5

The Three Certainties 6

The Three Certainties: • Certainty of intention • • Certainty of subject matter • • Certainty of objects

7

SIGNIFICANCE: • Settlor / testator •

1

1/28/21

• Trustee • • Beneficiary • • Courts 8

‘The Three Certainties’: • Certainty of intention • • Certainty of subject matter • • Certainty of objects

9

Certainty of intention • Paul v Constance [1977] 1 WLR 527 CA • • Jones v Lock (1865) LR Ch App 25 Lord Cranworth LC: “…I think it would be a very dangerous example if loose conversations of this sort, in important transactions of this kind, should have the effect of declarations of trust.”

10

• Rowe v Prance [1999] 2 FLR 787 • • Duggan v Full Sutton Prison Governor [2004] 1 WLR 1010 • Precatory words: • Re Adams and Kensington Vestry (1884) 27 Ch D 394 “in full confidence that she will do what is right as to the disposal thereof between my children” • Comiskey v Bowring-Hanbury [1905] AC 84 “in full confidence that…at her death she will devise it to such

2

1/28/21

one or more of my nieces as she may think fit” • Re Hamilton [1895] 2 Ch 370 11

‘The Three Certainties’: • Certainty of intention • • Certainty of subject matter • • Certainty of objects

12

Certainty of subject matter a) The trust property • b) The beneficial interest(s) Why? - Beneficiary - Trustee - Court

13

Certainty of objects • • To advance public (charitable) purposes • • To advance private purpose trusts (trusts of imperfect obligation – our ‘anomalous exceptions’) • • To benefit a person or persons – i.e. to benefit the BENEFICIARIES

14

The ‘type’ of trust determines which test to use:

15

Week 17 • Lecture 2.1 – The three certainties; Certainty of intention

3

1/28/21

• Lecture 2.2 – Certainty of subject matter • • Lecture 2.3 – Certainty of objects •

4...


Similar Free PDFs